In:Greece in Crisis: Combining critical discourse and corpus linguistics perspectives
Edited by Ourania Hatzidaki and Dionysis Goutsos
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 70] 2017
► pp. 457–466
Chapter 13Making sense of the Greek crisis
Published online: 26 July 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.70.13gou
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.70.13gou
Abstract
The epilogue to this volume summarizes its relevance and contribution as far as the synergy between critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics is concerned. It further discusses the issue of quantification, which seems to be the critical parameter in this synergy, and proposes the concept of discourse-driven quantification to complement the conventional corpus-driven quantification usually followed in corpus studies. Finally, it draws several conclusions on the basis of the individual chapters of the volume, which mainly concern the importance of genre as well as the viewpoint of various agents (discourse producers and receivers) as to how the Greek crisis is construed in diverse kinds of texts.
Keywords: agents, corpus linguistics, critical discourse analysis, genre, Greek crisis
References (20)
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society 19 (3): 273–306.
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, and Tony McEnery. 2013. Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baker, Paul, and Tony McEnery. 2005. “A Corpus-based Approach to Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in UN and Newspaper Texts.” Journal of Language and Politics 42: 197–226.
De Rycker, Antoon, and Zuraidah Mohd Don. 2013. “Discourse in Crisis, Crisis in Discourse.” In Discourse and Crisis. Critical Perspectives, ed. by Antoon De Rycker, and Zuraidah Mohd Don, 3–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.
Fragaki, Georgia. 2012. “Adjective Evaluation in Spoken Interaction.” Paper presented at the CADS (Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies) Conference, 13–14 September 2012, University of Bologna.
Goutsos, Dionysis. 2002. “Η χρήση των ηλεκτρονικών σωμάτων κειμένων στην ανάλυση λόγου [The use of electronic corpora in discourse analysis].” In Recherches en linguistique grecque, Actes du 5e Colloque International de Linguistique Grecque, Sorbonne, 13–15 September 2001, Tome I, ed. by Christos Clairis, 219–222. Paris: L’Harmattan.
. 2010b. “Greek in the Age of Corpora: Challenges and Solutions.” In Proceedings of the NooJ 2010 International Conference and Workshop, University of Thrace, 27–29 May 2010, 257–269.
Goutsos, Dionysis, and Georgia Fragaki. 2015. Εισαγωγή στη γλωσσολογία σωμάτων κειμένων [An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics]. Athens: Hellenic Academic Libraries Link. Available at: [URL]
Hatzidaki, Ourania. 2011. “Greek Men’s and Women’s Magazines as Codes of Gender Conduct: The Appropriation and Hybridisation of Deontic Modality.” In Living With Patriarchy. Discursive Constructions of Gendered Subjects across Public Spheres, ed. by Danijela Majstorovic, and Inger Lassen, 113–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Leech, Geoffrey. 1992. “Corpora and Theories of Linguistic Performance.” In Directions in Corpus Linguistics: Proceedings of the Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm, 4–8 August 1991, ed. by Jan Svartvik, 105–122. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
McEnery, Tony, and Andrew Hardie. 2012. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sinclair, John. 1996. “Preliminary Recommendations on Corpus Typology.” EAGLES document. Available at: [URL] [Accessed 6 November 2016].