Cover not available

In:Greece in Crisis: Combining critical discourse and corpus linguistics perspectives
Edited by Ourania Hatzidaki and Dionysis Goutsos
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 70] 2017
► pp. 45–82

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 2
The dream that turned into a nightmare

Addressing the Greek voters long and right before the crisis

Published online: 26 July 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.70.02kos
Abstract
This study aims at shedding light on the evolution of the pre-electoral discourse of two of the most prominent politicians of the 2000s, centre right-wing Kostas Karamanlis and social-democrat George Papandreou and, in particular, on the transformation of their lexical choices across three pre-crisis national election campaigns (2004, 2007 and 2009). Furthermore, it critically presents lexical choices with positive and negative prosody for the voting audience and examines how they function as rhetorical tools for persuading and manipulating the addressees (traditional, potential and swing voters) in the light of the broader socio-political context.
Article outline
  • 1.Campaign talk as a subgenre of political discourse
  • 2.The context of situation
  • 3.Corpus and methodology
  • 4.Data analysis
    • 4.1A positive prosody word: όραμα ‘vision’
      • 4.1.1Karamanlis’ speeches
      • 4.1.2Papandreou’s speeches
    • 4.2Other positive prosody words
      • 4.2.1όνειρο ‘dream’
      • 4.2.2νέα ‘new’
      • 4.2.3ανάπτυξη ‘development’, μέλλον ‘future’, προοπτική ‘prospects’
      • 4.2.4ελπίδα ‘hope’, αισιοδοξίa ‘optimism’, εμπιστοσύνη ‘trust’, σιγουριά ‘certainty’
    • 4.3Negative prosody words
      • 4.3.1κρίση ‘crisis’
      • 4.3.2χρέος ‘debt’, πρόβλημα ‘problem’, μέτρα ‘measures’
    • 4.4A dual prosody word: αλήθεια ‘truth’
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
References (52)
References
Allen, Wendy. 2007. “Australian Political Discourse: Pronominal Choice in Campaign Speeches.” In Selected Papers from the 2006 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, ed. by Mary Laughren, and Ilana Mushin, 1–13. Brisbane: University of Queensland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atkinson, Maxwell J.. 1984. Our Masters’ Voices: The Language and Body Language of Politics. London and New York: Methuen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Paul. 2012. “Corpus and Gender Studies.” In Corpus Applications to Applied Linguistics, ed. by Ken Hyland, Meng Huat Chau, and Michael Handford, 100–116. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beard, Adrian. 2000. The Language of Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capone, Alessandro. 2010. “Barack Obama’s South Carolina Speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2964–2977. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2011. Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2005. “Missing Links in Mainstream CDA: Modules, Blends and the Critical Instinct.” In A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Paul Chilton, 19–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul, and Christina Schäffner. 2002. “Themes and Principles in the Analysis of Political Discourse.” In Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, ed. by Paul Chilton, and Christina Schäffner, 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cockcroft, Robert, and Susan Cockroft (eds). 2005. Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric. Hampshire/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cos, Grant C. 2008. “Political Rhetoric.” In Encyclopedia of Political Communication, ed. by Lynda Lee Kaid, and Christina Holtz-Bacha, 716–719. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cosmides, Leda. 1989. “The Logic of Social Exchange: Has Natural Selection Shaped How Humans Reason? Studies with the Wason Selection Task.” Cognition 31: 187–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Beaugrande, Richard, and Wolfgang Dressler. 1981. Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emrich, Cynthia G., Holly H. Brower, Jack M. Feldman, and Howard Garland. 2001. “Images in Words: Presidential Rhetoric, Charisma, and Greatness.” Administrative Science Quarterly 46 (3): 527–557. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Isabela Fairclough. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis. A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Featherstone, Kevin. 2011. “The Greek Sovereign Debt Crisis and EMU: A Failing State in a Skewed Regime.” Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (2): 193–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frantzi, Katerina T., and Marianthi Georgalidou. 2007. “Conversational Strategies in Written Political Discourse: A Corpus Linguistics Approach.” Paper presented at the 10th International Pragmatics Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Friendly, Michael, Patricia E. Fraklin, David Hoffman, and David C. Rubin. 1982. “Methods and Designs. The Toronto Word Pool. Norms for Imagery, Concreteness, Orthographic Variables, and Grammatical Usage for 1080 Words.” Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation 14 (4): 375–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garber, Marjorie. 2012. Loaded Words. New York: Fordham University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts , ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry Morgan, 68–134. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howarth, David. 2000. Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Jason, and Shân Wareing. 1999. “Language and Politics.” In Language, Society and Power, ed. by Linda Thomas, and Shân Wareing, 31–47. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jowett, Garth, and Victoria O’Donnell. 1992. Propaganda and Persuasion. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis. 2012. “Exiting the Greek Crisis in Three Steps.” In A World of Crisis and Shifting Geopolitics: Greece, the Eastern Mediterranean and Europe. A Conference Report , The 10th Anniversary of the Constantine G. Karamanlis Chair in Hellenic and European Studies , October 28th, 2011, ed. by Michalis Psalidopoulos, 103–110. Athens: I. Sideris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. 1966. English in Advertising: A Linguistic Study of Advertising in Great Britain. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luntz, Frank. 2008. Words that Work. It’s Not What You Say, It’s What People Hear. New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martindale, Colin. 1975. Romantic Progression: The Psychology of Literary History. Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1976. “Primitive Mentality and the Relationship between Art and Society.” Scientific Aesthetics 1: 5–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mavris, Yiannis. 2009. “Οι διαφορές των τριών τελευταίων εκλογικών αναμετρήσεων [The differences among the last three electoral rallies].” Kathimerini 20/09/2009. Available at: [URL]
. 2011. “Parliamentary election of 16 September 2007: Extension and decremental replication of 2004.” Available at: [URL]
Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and Political Discourse Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paivio, Allan, John C. Yuille, and Steven A. Madigan. 1968. “Concreteness, Imagery, and Meaningfulness Values for 925 Nouns.” Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement, 76 (1): 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, Allan. 2003. The Linguistics of Political Argument. The Spin-Doctor and the Wolf-Pack at the White House. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair. 1994. “The Politics of Pronouns.” ELT Journal 48 (2): 173–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poerksen, Uwe. 1995. Plastic Words. The Tyranny of Modular Language. Philadelphia: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polletta, Francesca. 2006. It Was Like a Fever. Storytelling in Protest and Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schäffner, Christina. 2010. “Political Communication: Mediated by Translation.” In Perspectives in Politics and Discourse, ed. by Urszula Okulska, and Piotr Cap, 255–278. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1975. “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts.” In Language, Mind, and Knowledge. Volume VII, ed. by Keith Gunderson, 344–369. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1996. Text and Corpus Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Three Concepts of Keywords.” In Keyness in Texts, ed. by Marina Bondi, and Mike Scott, 21–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomson, Geoff. 2013. “Picking an Argument: Politicians’ Choice of Persuasive Strategies.” In Systemic Functional Linguistics. Exploring Choice, ed. by Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett, and Gerard O’Grady, 226–246. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsakona, Villy. 2009. “Linguistic Creativity, Secondary Orality, and Political Discourse: The Modern Greek Myth of the ‘Eloquent Orator’.” Journal of Modern Greek Studies 27: 81–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tzogopoulos, George. 2013. The Greek Crisis in the Media: Stereotyping in the International Press. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun. 1996. “Discourse, Power and Access.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard, and Malcolm Coulthard, 84–104. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. “The Study of Discourse.” In Discourse as Structure and Process, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 1–34. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Society in Discourse: How Context Controls Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vernadakis, Christoforos. 2004. “Βουλευτικές εκλογές 2004: Μια αποτίμηση της προεκλογικής περιόδου και των εκλογικών αποτελεσμάτων [2004 national elections: A review of the election campaign and results].” Θέσεις 87 (2). Available at: [URL].
Vertessen, Dieter, and Christ’l de Landtsheer. 2008. “A Metaphorical Election Style. Use of Metaphor at Election Time.” In Political Language and Metaphor: Interpreting and Changing the World, ed. by Terrell Carver, and Jernej Pikalo. 271–285. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willner, Ann R. 1984. The Spellbinders: Charismatic Political Leadership. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. “The Discourse-Historical Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 63–94. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. The Discourse of Politics in Action. Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue