In:Identity Struggles: Evidence from workplaces around the world
Edited by Dorien Van De Mieroop and Stephanie Schnurr
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 69] 2017
► pp. 407–426
Chapter 22Household workers’ use of directives to negotiate their professional identity in Lima, Peru
Published online: 26 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.69.22del
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.69.22del
Abstract
This article examines interactions between employers in Lima, Peru, and their household workers who are generally perceived as unskilled (Fuertes, Rodríguez and Casali 2013). Using a constructionist approach (Bucholtz and Hall 2005), I explore the household workers’ struggle to negotiate professional identities using directives in task-oriented situations. Directives are associated with higher professional ranks in the workplace (Holmes and Stubbs 2003), thus indexing power. The data consists of audio-recorded interactions between household workers and their employers. The analysis of these interactions shows that household workers use directives to position themselves in non-subordinate roles with their employers’ consent. In using directives, workers take charge and assert their knowledge with certain tasks to claim expertise power (Vine 2004) and create a more professional or skilled work identity.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Domestic service in Peru
- Frames, relational work and directives in discursive negotiations of identity
- Directives and their strategic employment for identity negotiation in the workplace
-
Data and analysis
- Address systems as markers of power differences between household workers and employers
- The household workers’ construction of expertise power employing directives
- Self-initiated directives
- Invited directives
- Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes Appendix References
References (40)
Ally, Shireen. 2009. From Servants to Workers: South African Domestic Workers and the Democratic State. Ithaca: LR Press.
Benwell, Bethan, and Elizabeth Stokoe. [2006]2010. Discourse and Identity. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper. 1989. “Investigating cross-cultural pragmatics: an introductory overview.” In: Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, ed. by Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper, 1–29. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman. 1960. “The pronouns of power and solidarity.” In Style in Language, ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 253–76. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bucholtz, Mary and Kira Hall. 2005. “Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach.” Discourse Studies 7: 585–614.
Clyne, Michael. 1994. Intercultural communication at work: Cultural Values in Discourse. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2008. “Reflections on impoliteness relational work and power.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Miriam Locher, and Derek Bousfield, 17–44. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Davies, Bronwyn, and Rom Harré. 1990. “Positioning: The discursive production of selves.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 2: 43–63.
Degregori, Carlos Iván. 1993. “Identidad étnica, movimientos sociales y participación política en el Perú.” In Las formas políticas de la democracia en los países andinos, ed. by Alberto Adrianzén, 113–133. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos/IFEA.
(de la) Cadena, Marisol. 2005. “Are "mestizos" Hybrids? the Conceptual Politics of Andean Identities”. Journal of Latin American Studies 37: 259–84.
Félix-Brasdefer, César. 2005. “Indirectness and Politeness in Mexican Requests”. In Selected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. by David Eddington, 66–78. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Retrieved from: [URL]
Fuertes, Patricia, Eduardo Rodríguez and Pablo Casali (eds). 2013. Trabajo doméstico remunerado en el Perú. Situación y perspectivas en función del Convenio 189 y la Recomendación 201 de la OIT. Lima: OIT/ Oficina de la OIT para los Países Andinos.
García, Carmen. 1993. “Making a request and responding to it: A case study of Peruvian Spanish speakers.” Journal of Pragmatics 19: 127–152.
Haverkate, Henk. 1984. Speech Acts, Speakers, and Hearers: Reference and Referential Strategies in Spanish. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Heritage John, and Steven Clayman. [2010]2012. TaLk In Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Holmes, Janet, and Maria Stubbe. 2003. Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work. Great Britain: Routledge.
Holmes, Janet, and Meredith Marra. 2004. “Relational practice in the workplace: Women’s talk or gendered discourse?” Language in Society 33(03): 377–398.
Holmes, Janet, Meredith Marra, and Bernadette Vine. 2011. Leadership, Discourse and Ethnicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jones, Kimberly. 1992. “A question of context: directive use at a Morris team meeting.” Language in Society 21: 427–445.
Locher, Miriam. 2004. Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Locher, Miriam, and Richard Watts. 2008. “Relational work and impoliteness: negotiating norms of linguistic behavior.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Miriam Locher, and Derek Bousfield, 77–100. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Marra, Meredith, and Jo Angouri. 2011. “Investigating the negotiation of identity: A view from the field of workplace discourse.” In Constructing Identities at Work, ed. by Meredith Marra and Jo Angouri, 1–14. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Márquez-Reiter, Rosina. 2002. “A contrastive study of indirectness in Spanish: evidence from Peninsular Uruguayan Spanish”. Pragmatics 12(2): 135–151.
Mick, Carola. 2011. “Discourses of ‘border-crossers’. Peruvian domestic workers as social actors.” Discourse Studies 13(2): 189–209.
Mullany, Louise. 2007. Gendered Discourse in the Professional Workplace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Paan, Claudia. 2010. Empleadas-hogar-ganan300-promedio. Retrieved from: [URL]Jueves 08 de abril del 2010 | 10:17
Placencia, María Elena. 2005 “Pragmatic Variation in Corner Store Interactions in Quito and Madrid.” Hispania 88(3): 583–598.
Ruzickova, Elena. 2007. “Strong and mild requestive hints and positive-face redress in Cuban” Spanish.” Journal of Pragmatics 39(6): 1170–1202.
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1999. “Discourse, Pragmatics, Conversation, Analysis.” Discourse Studies 1(4): 405–435.
Schnurr, Stephanie, Meredith Marra, and Janet Holmes. 2008. “Impoliteness as a means of contesting and challenging power relations in the workplace.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Bousfield, Derek and Miriam Locher, 211–230. M. A. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Schnurr, Stephanie, and Olga Zayts. 2011. “Constructing and contesting leaders. In Constructing Identities at Work, ed. by Meredith Marra and Jo Angouri, 40–60. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tannen, Deborah. 1993. “What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations.” In Framing in Discourse, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 260–279. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vine, Bernadette. 2004. Getting Things Done at Work. The Discourse of Power in Workplace Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2009. “Directives at work: Exploring the contextual complexity of workplace directives.” Journal of Pragmatics 41(7): 151–160.
Viviano Llave, Teresa and Carmen Barrantes. 2007. Detrás del Mandil, Trabajadoras del hogar víctimas de maltrato y hostigamiento sexual. Lima Ministerio de la Mujer y Desarrollo Social.
