In:Identity Struggles: Evidence from workplaces around the world
Edited by Dorien Van De Mieroop and Stephanie Schnurr
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 69] 2017
► pp. 95–124
Chapter 6Who’s the expert?
Negotiating competence and authority in guided tours
Published online: 26 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.69.06des
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.69.06des
Abstract
Guided tours are a “perspicuous setting” (Garfinkel & Wieder 1992) both for the study of asymmetries in professional contexts of interaction as well as for the analysis of how participants negotiate identities, categories and expertise. At first glance, the categorial distinction between “guide” and “guided” participants appears to be clear-cut. However, analyses of video recorded tours taking place in various sites show that the taken-for-granted authority, expertise and thus identity of the “guide” is repeatedly challenged by his or her co-participants. Based on conversation analytic methods, in this chapter we focus on sequences of interaction in which the participants compete for epistemic authority. We show how such competition emerges, how participants handle it, and how it is eventually solved.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Unpacking the notion of identity
- Guided tours: “Knowledgeable guide” and “unknowing guided”?
- Claiming knowledge in first position
- Claiming knowledge in second position
- Guided participants responding to the guide’s emerging projections
- Completion of recognizably “incomplete” turns
- Early completion in overlap
- Exploiting ongoing projections: Competing continuations of the guide’s turn
- Continuing after the end of a sequence initiated by the guide
- Competing for the right to extend the explanation
- Discussion and conclusion
Notes References
References (29)
Best, Katie. 2012. “Making museum tours better: Understanding what a guided tour really is and what a tour guide really does.” Museum Management and Curatorship 27 (1): 35–52.
Broth, Mathias, and Mondada, Lorenza. 2013. “Walking away. The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 47 (1): 41–58.
De Stefani, Elwys. 2010. “Reference as an interactively and multimodally accomplished practice: Organizing spatial reorientation in guided tours.” In Spoken Communication, ed. by Massimo Pettorino, Antonella Giannini, Isabella Chiari, and Francesca Dovetto, 137–170. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
. 2013. “Rearranging (in) space: On mobility and its relevance for the study of face-to-face interaction.” In Space in Language and Linguistics: Geographical, Interactional and Cognitive Perspectives, ed. by Peter Auer, Martin Hilpert, Benedikt Szmercsanyi, and Anja Stukenbrock, 434–463. Berlin: De Gruyter.
De Stefani, Elwys, and Horlacher, Anne-Sylvie. 2008. “Topical and sequential backlinking in a French radio phone-in programme: Turn shapes and sequential placements.” Pragmatics 18 (3): 381–406.
De Stefani, Elwys, and Mondada, Lorenza. 2014. “Reorganizing mobile formations: When ‘guided’ participants initiate reorientations in guided tours.” Space and Culture 17 (2): 157–175.
Garfinkel, Harold, and Wieder, D. Lawrence. 1992. “Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis.” In Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology, ed. by Graham Watson, and Robert M. Seiler, 175–205. London: Sage.
Goodwin, Charles. 1979. “The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 97–121. New York: Irvington Publishers.
Goodwin, Charles, and Goodwin, Marjorie H. 1987. “Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments.” IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 1 (1): 1–54.
Haddington, Pentti, Mondada, Lorenza, and Nevile, Maurice (eds.). 2013. Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Heritage, John. 1984. “A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2012. “The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52.
Heritage, John, and Raymond, Geoffrey. 2005. “The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 15–28.
Jefferson, Gail. 1972. “Side sequences.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 294–338. New York: The Free Press.
. 2004. “Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner. 13–31. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
McIlvenny, Paul, Broth, Mathias, and Haddington, Pentti. 2009. “Communicating place, space and mobility.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (10): 1879–1886.
Mondada, Lorenza. 2009. “Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (10): 1977–1997.
. 2012. “Garden lessons: Embodied action and joint attention in extended sequences.” In Interaction and Everyday Life, ed. by Hisashu Nasu and Frances Chaput Waksler, 293–311. Lanham, MA: Lexington Books.
. 2013. “Displaying, contesting, and negotiating epistemic authorities in social interaction.” Discourse Studies 15 (5): 597–626.
. 2014. “Bodies in action: Multimodal analysis of walking and talking.” Language and Dialogue 4 (3): 357–403.
Pierroux, Palmyre. 2010. “Guiding meaning on guided tours.” In Inside Multimodal Composition, ed. by Andrew Morrison, 417–450. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Pitsch, Karola. 2012. “Zur interaktiven Konstitution von Objekten in einer Museumsausstellung [On the interactive constitution of objects in a museum exhibit].” In Raum als interaktive Ressource, ed. by Heiko Hausendorf, Lorenza Mondada, and Reinhold Schmitt, 233–274. Tübingen: Narr.
Stukenbrock, Anja, and Birkner, Karin. 2010. “Multimodale Ressourcen für Stadtführungen [Multimodal resources for city tours].” In Deutschland als fremde Kultur: Vermittlungsverfahren in Touristenführungen, ed. by Marcella Costa, and Bernd Müller-Jacquier, 214–243. München: Judicium Verlag.
Sacks, Harvey. 1972. “An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 31–74. New York: The Free Press.
Stivers, Tanya. 2010. “An overview of the question-response system in American English conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (10): 2772–2781.
Van De Mieroop, Dorien, and Clifton, Jonathan. 2011. “Standardized relational pairs in interviews with former slaves: Construction, negotiation and alignment.” Narrative Inquiry 21 (1): 44–67.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
De Stefani, Elwys
Rauniomaa, Mirka, Tiina Keisanen & Pauliina Siitonen
2021. Shared understandings of the human–nature relationship in
encounters with small wildlife. In Intersubjectivity in Action [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 326], ► pp. 201 ff.
Schoofs, Kim & Dorien Van De Mieroop
De Stefani, Elwys & Lorenza Mondada
De Stefani, Elwys & Lorenza Mondada
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.