In:Discursive Strategies and Political Hegemony: The Turkish case
Can Küçükali
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 64] 2015
► pp. 1–14
Chapter 1. Introduction
Published online: 1 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.64.01ch1
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.64.01ch1
It is more than a decade since the AKP (Justice and Development Party) came
to power as a single political party in Turkey in 2002. Irrespective of who
criticizes or appreciates its policy preferences and their implementation, many
would agree that, going beyond its institutional existence, this party, which has
its roots in political Islamic tradition,1 symbolizes a new era in Turkish politics,
in the sense that the socioeconomic structure of the country has changed immensely
in favour of the current needs of global markets and politics, respectively
(Şen, 2010). Although the transformation is an ongoing process and
started long before the party came to power (the adaptation to neoliberal capital
accumulation and the societal effects of these policy preferences began in the
1980s), the AKP has taken many initiatives to speed up the transformation.
Alongside its political and financial power, the political discourse of the party
has also been crucial in this process. The party has benefited from strategic
language use to create its political hegemony. It has sought to establish a discursive
sphere which imposes neoliberal policymaking as the only way of making
progress. This attempt to create discursive hegemony as part of a wider political
hegemony attracted my interest and motivated me to further investigate the
discursive-strategic aspects of such policymaking in a systematic way, i.e. to
decipher the actual content, direction and effects of policy practices.
