In:From Text to Political Positions: Text analysis across disciplines
Edited by Bertie Kaal, Isa Maks and Annemarie van Elfrinkhof
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 55] 2014
► pp. 135–160
The Qualitative Analysis of Political Documents
Published online: 7 May 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.55.07wes
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.55.07wes
Qualitative document analysis remains one of the most common, yet methodologically misunderstood, components of political science research. While analysts are accustomed to incorporating manifestos, speeches, and other documents as evidence in their studies, few approach the task with the same level of understanding and sophistication as when applying quantitative methods. Building bridges between the two traditions, this chapter suggests guidelines for the rigorous, qualitative study of political documents. The discussion includes a novel examination of materials from the Poltext Project collection – a compilation of documents from across the Canadian provinces. The paper concludes that, whether approaching their work from a quantitative or non-quantitative perspective, researchers must adhere to similar disciplinary standards if their findings are to be considered trustworthy contributions to political science.
References (50)
Becker, H.S. 1998. Tricks of the Trade: How to Think about Your Research While You’re Doing It. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Berg, B.L. 2004. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. 5th Edition. Toronto: Pearson.
Berman, S. 2001. Ideas, norms, and culture in political analysis: Review article. Comparative Politics 33(2), pp. 231–250.
Boyatzis, R.E. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Brady, H.E., D. Collier and J. Seawright. 2004. Refocusing the discussion of methodology. In H.E. Brady and D. Collier (eds.) Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 3–20.
Cohen, A. 1974. Two-Dimensional Man: An Essay on the Anthropology of Power and Symbolism in Complex Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Copsey, N. 2007. Changing course or changing clothes? Reflections on the ideological evolution of the British National Party 1999-2006. Patterns of Prejudice 41(1), pp. 61–82.
Corbetta, P. 2003. Social Research: Theory, Methods and Techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J.W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Frankenberg, G. 2006. Comparing constitutions: Ideas, ideals, and ideology—toward a layered narrative. International Journal of Constitutional Law 4(3), pp. 439–459.
George, A.L. 2006. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to content analysis. In J. Scott (ed.) Documentary Research. Volume 1. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. pp. 135–160.
Hart, R.P., S.E. Jarvis and E.T. Lim. 2002. The American people in crisis: A content analysis. Political Psychology 23(3), pp. 417–437.
Hesse-Biber, S.N. and P. Leavy. 2006. The Practice of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Holliday, A. 2007. Doing and Writing Qualitative Research. 2nd Ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Hsieh, H. and S.E. Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15, pp. 1277–1288.
King, G., R. Keohane and S. Verba. 1993. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Laitin, D.D. 1986. Hegemony and Culture: Politics and Religious Change among the Yoruba. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Laver, M. 2001. Why should we estimate the policy position of political actors? In M. Laver (ed.) Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors. London: Routledge. pp. 1–3
Lewis, J. and J. Ritchie. 2006. Generalizing from qualitative research. In J. Ritchie and J. Lewis (eds.) Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. pp. 263–286.
Manheim, J.B., R.C. Rich and L. Willnat (eds.). 2002. Empirical Political Analysis: Research Methods in Political Science. 5th Ed. Toronto: Longman.
Miles, M.B. and A.M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Morse, J.M., M. Barrett, M. Mayan, K. Olson and J. Spiers. 2002. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods1(2), pp. 13–22.
Morse, J.M. and L. Richards. 2002. Read Me First for a User’s Guide to Qualitative Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Neuman, W.L. and K. Robson. 2007. Basics of Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Canadian Edition. Toronto: Pearson.
Phillips, L. 1998. Hegemony and political discourse: The lasting impact of Thatcherism. Sociology 32(4), pp. 847–867.
Platt, J. 2006a. Evidence and proof in documentary research: Part I, some specific problems of documentary research. In J. Scott (ed.) Documentary Research. Volume 1. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. p. 83.
. 2006b. Evidence and proof in documentary research: Part II, some shared problems of documentary research. In Documentary Research, edited by J. Scott. Volume 1. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. p. 105.
Punch, K.F. 2005. Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Putnam, R. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Richerson, P.J. and R. Boyd. 2004. The Origin and Evolution of Cultures. London: Oxford University Press.
Shively, W. Ph. 1998. The Craft of Political Research. 4th Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Smith, C.A. and K.B. Smith. 2000. A rhetorical perspective on the 1997 British party manifestos. Political Communication 17(4), pp. 457–473.
Snape, D. and L. Spencer. 2006. The foundations of qualitative research. In J. Ritchie and J. Lewis (eds.) Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Tashakkori, A. and Ch. Teddlie (eds). 2003. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Weinroth, M. 2004. Rituals of rhetoric and nationhood: The liberal anti-deficit campaign, 1994–1998. Journal of Canadian Studies 38(2), pp. 44–79.
Wesley, J.J. 2009. In search of brokerage and responsibility: Party politics in Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Political Science 42(1), pp. 211–236.
Cited by (29)
Cited by 29 other publications
Akarsu, Osman
Akarsu, Osman
Allen, Nathan & Nicholas Bremner
AlMuaili, Mansour
Folvarčný, Adam & Lubomír Kopeček
Sijstermans, Judith, P. Anderson & C. Brown Swan
Cantir, Cristian
Fischer, Sara E., Lucia Vitale, Akinyi Lisa Agutu & Matthew M. Kavanagh
Hu, Zhiming, Huimin Ma, Jie Xiong, Peiran Gao & Pradeep Kumar Ponnamma Divakaran
POYRAZ, Erol
Saur, Line & Rita Nikolai
Zhao, Xin & Narissa Tsuboi
AYDOĞAN ÜNAL, Betül
de Perini, Pietro
de Perini, Pietro
Siddi, Marco & Federica Prandin
de Perini, Pietro & Desirée Campagna
Saratchandra, Minu, Anup Shrestha & Peter A. Murray
Lupien, Pascal, Adriana Rincón, Francisco Carrera & Germán Lagos
Meehan, Joanne & Bruce D. Pinnington
Moscovitz, Hannah
Shepherd, Adam & Benjamin Hanckel
Watkins, Daryl V., Aaron D. Clevenger & Greg Simons
Pressman, Jeremy
Arielyi, Nivi Gal & Emanuel Tamir
Burke, Matthew J.
Harrison, Celine, Maria Harries & Mark Liddiard
Sihvonen, Ella
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
