Cover not available

In:From Text to Political Positions: Text analysis across disciplines
Edited by Bertie Kaal, Isa Maks and Annemarie van Elfrinkhof
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 55] 2014
► pp. 163–170

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

PART II: Introduction

ORCiD logo with link
Published online: 7 May 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.55.002kol
References (13)
References
Czarniawska, B. and P. Gagliardi (eds.). 2003. Narratives we Organize by. Amsterdam: ­Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. 1985. Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 9(6), pp. 739–763. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnstone, B. 2001. Discourse analysis and narrative. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H.E. ­Hamilton (Eds), Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 635–649.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koller, V. 2005. Critical discourse analysis and social cognition: Evidence from business media discourse. Discourse & Society16(2), pp. 199–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1992. Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the gulf. In M. Pütz (ed.) Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution: Studies in Honour of René Dirven on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 463–481.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, M. 2008. Rhetoric of political speeches. In R. Wodak and V. Koller (eds), Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 243–269.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, M. and R. Wodak. 2009. The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed. London: Sage, pp. 87–121.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E., A. Hardie, V. Koller and P. Rayson. 2009. A computer-assisted approach to the analysis of metaphor variation across genres. In J. Barnden, M. Lee, J. Littlemore, R. Moon, 
G. Philip and A. Wallington (eds.), Corpus-Based Approaches to Figurative Language: A Corpus Linguistics 2009 colloquium. Birmingham: University of Birmingham School of ­Computer Science, pp. 145–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. 2003. The discourse-knowledge interface. In G. Weiss and R. Wodak (eds.), Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 85–109.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Beattie, Belinda
2024. Australian Newspaper Framing of the 1905 Papua Act. Media History 30:1 ► pp. 46 ff. DOI logo
Dr Tanweer Ali & Pühringer, Stephan
2015. Markets as “ultimate judges” of economic policies: Angela Merkel’s discourse profile during the economic crisis and the European crisis policies. On the Horizon 23:3 ► pp. 246 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue