In:Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and practice
Edited by Piotr Cap and Urszula Okulska
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 50] 2013
► pp. 187–221
Chapter 5. Analyzing meetings in political and business contexts
Different genres – similar strategies?
Published online: 16 July 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.50.07wod
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.50.07wod
This chapter compares various instances of everyday routine meetings in political institutions (such as the European Parliament and the European Commission) with meetings in business organizations, with the aim of, first describing similarities and differences in the genre (and subgenres) of meetings across organizations and social fields; and of secondly investigating the impact of organizational knowledge of the genre on presuppositions and context models of the participants related to the interaction and intended outcome of the meetings. I argue that the concept of a “prototype genre of meeting” is adequate for an integrated, interdisciplinary discourse-analytical and sociolinguistic theoretical framework which allows understanding and explaining the intricate dynamic of meetings in a systematic, in-depth, and context-dependent way. Moreover, I claim that organizational knowledge of the genre is part and parcel of successful interaction strategies; and that much miscommunication and problems could be avoided if manifest and latent genre conventions were sufficiently acknowledged. Drawing on transcribed data of 36 meetings in the European Parliament and European Commission, on the one hand, and of 6 meetings (2 away days, 4 regular) in one large business organization, on the other hand, I illustrate the salience of the genre characteristics in the interaction and its intended, expected, and actual outcome.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Kwon, Winston, Ian Clarke, Eero Vaara, Rowan Mackay & Ruth Wodak
Hoops, Joshua F. & Keli Braitman
Nyberg, Daniel & Christian De Cock
Haug, Christoph
Haug, Christoph
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
