In:Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and practice
Edited by Piotr Cap and Urszula Okulska
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 50] 2013
► pp. 101–133
Chapter 3. Policy, policy communication and discursive shifts
Analyzing EU policy discourses on climate change
Published online: 16 July 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.50.05krz
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.50.05krz
This chapter presents a closely related discursive and generic analysis of European Union policy on climate change. The analysis focuses on the years 2007–2011 when the EU climate change policy accelerated and underwent several significant shifts. At the discursive level, the analysis of the said shifts is framed by such concepts as “discursive change” and “discursive shifts” which help looking for both global/transnational frames and local, actor-specific appropriations/responses to social, political and economic transformations. At the level of genre analysis, the chapter scrutinizes the EU climate-change policy dynamics by examining discrepancies within/between the well-established field of “policy” and the relatively new field of “policy communication”. As the analysis shows, while appropriating different facets of discursive change in local discursive shifts, the policy itself is dynamic and responsive to developments within both the EU and its more or less distant social, political and economic context. However, at the same time, the policy-communication remains relatively unchanged in its focus throughout the period of investigation thus showing that, whereas the EU policies such as those on climate change do change over time, such a change is often not communicated to the general public despite the actual presence of policy-communication genres which, at least hypothetically, should facilitate that process.
Cited by (37)
Cited by 37 other publications
Way, Lyndon C. S., Stephen McLoughlin & Irem Inceoglu
2025. Fighting authoritarian populism with populism in polarised Turkey. Journal of Language and Politics
Ye, Jun, Changpeng Huan & Hang Su
Zhou, Wenfang, Changlai Chen, Guofeng Wang & Hexu Lv
Bevitori, Cinzia & Katherine E. Russo
Johnson, Paige
Wang, Guofeng & Changpeng Huan
Wang, Guofeng, Xiuzhen Wu, Yupei Xiang & Yingzi Qu
Wagenmakers, Tom
Kaskinen, Saija
Krzyżanowski, Michał & Natalia Krzyżanowska
Álvares, Maria
Abamosa, Juhar Yasin, Line Torbjørnsen Hilt & Kariane Westrheim
Magdi Fawzy, Rania
Bennett, Samuel
Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer
2018. Euphemism as a discursive strategy in US local and state politics. Journal of Language and Politics 17:6 ► pp. 789 ff.
Krzyżanowski, Michał, Anna Triandafyllidou & Ruth Wodak
Rheindorf, Markus
2018. Disciplining the unwilling. In Doing Politics [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 80], ► pp. 179 ff.
Rheindorf, Markus
Triandafyllidou, Anna
Kesylytė-Alliks, Eglė
Kesylytė-Alliks, Eglė
Wodak, Ruth & Michał Krzyżanowski
Krzyżanowski, Michał & Bernhard Forchtner
Savski, Kristof
Savski, Kristof
Savski, Kristof
2018. The roles of field and capital in negotiating language policy in the Slovene parliament. Journal of Language and Politics 17:1 ► pp. 24 ff.
Savski, Kristof
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2015. International leadership re-/constructed?. Journal of Language and Politics 14:1 ► pp. 110 ff.
Krzyżanowski, Michał
Krzyżanowski, Michał
Krzyżanowski, Michał
Krzyżanowski, Michał
Krzyżanowski, Michał
Cap, Piotr
2014. Review of Dontcheva-Navratilova (2011): Coherence in Political Speeches. Journal of Language and Politics 13:2 ► pp. 371 ff.
Cap, Piotr
2015. Monologic follow-ups in political macro-discourse. In The Dynamics of Political Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 259], ► pp. 59 ff.
Cap, Piotr
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
