Attorneys’ silencing strategies during courtroom cross-examination: 4. Quiet in the court

Fridland, Valérie

doi:10.1075/dapsac.5.09fri

In:Discourse and Silencing: Representation and the language of displacement
Edited by Lynn Thiesmeyer
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 5] 2003
► pp. 119–138

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

4. Quiet in the court

Attorneys’ silencing strategies during courtroom cross-examination

Valérie Fridland

Published online: 29 August 2003

https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.5.09fri

Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Order by:

Derry, Caroline

2020. Introduction. In Lesbianism and the Criminal Law, ► pp. 1 ff.

MacDonald, David B.

2020. Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission: Assessing context, process, and critiques. Griffith Law Review 29:1 ► pp. 150 ff.

Garbutt, Joanna

2018. The Use of No Comment by Suspects in Police Interviews. In Exploring Silence and Absence in Discourse, ► pp. 329 ff.

Guo, Jing-ying

2012. ‘Anyone in my shoes will end up like me’: Female inmates’ discourse of responsibility for crime. Discourse & Society 23:1 ► pp. 34 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.