In:Studies in Political Humour: In between political critique and public entertainment
Edited by Villy Tsakona and Diana Elena Popa
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 46] 2011
► pp. 1–30
Chapter 1. Humour in politics and the politics of humour
An introduction
Published online: 15 November 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.46.03tsa
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.46.03tsa
In this chapter, the authors offer a working definition of political humour and summarise its main aspects as discussed in the relevant literature: the genres where political humour surfaces or dominates; the reasons why political criticism is so often encoded in humorous terms; and the (side-)effects of political humour. They also discuss the so-called “inherent ambiguity of humour”, thus explaining why political humour does not necessarily influence politics. Rather than provoking social and political change, political humour conveys criticism against the political status quo and recycles and reinforces dominant values and views on politics. The diverse sociopolitical conditions may influence who is allowed to participate in the creation and circulation of political humour and who may become its target.
Cited by (30)
Cited by 30 other publications
Al-Ali, Mohammed Nahar & Badra Hadj Djelloul
2025. The role of multimodality and intertextuality in accentuating humor in Algerian Hirak’s
posters. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 35:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Bellè, Elisa
Dumitrica, Delia, Mark Boukes, Delia Chiaro, Anastasiya Fiadotava & Giselinde Kuipers
Lalić-Krstin, Gordana & Nadežda Silaški
Schubert, Christoph
Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina & Galia Hirsch
2025. What kind of laughter?. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 35:2 ► pp. 258 ff.
Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena
2024. Can you amuse the audience through an interpreter?. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 36:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
Bertella, Giovanna & Lucia Tomassini
Coppola, Claudia, Giorgia Mannaioli & Edoardo Lombardi Vallauri
2024. Vagueness and ambiguity are very different (persuasion
devices). In Vagueness, Ambiguity, and All the Rest [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 347], ► pp. 51 ff.
Georgalidou, Marianthi
Romancini, Richard, Viviane Barbosa Marques & Fernanda Castilho Santana
Semotiuk, Orest
Semotiuk, Orest
Bülow, Lars & Michael Johann
Hirsch, Galia & Pnina Shukrun-Nagar
Khaylina, Anastasia & M. Belén Alvarado Ortega
Movchan, Diana, Iryna Ushchapovska & Alina Savchuk
Russell, Constance, Patrick Chandler & Justin Dillon
Semotiuk, Orest & Viktoriya Shevchenko
Chaves, Thomas David F.
2022. Mockery and poetic satire. In Humour in Self-Translation [Topics in Humor Research, 11], ► pp. 15 ff.
Dynel, Marta & Fabio Indìo Massimo Poppi
Tesnohlidkova, Olivera
Tsakona, Villy
Tsakona, Villy
2022. “The doctor said I suffer from Vitamin € deficiency”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 287 ff.
Aitaki, Georgia
Rigatos, Tuğçe Saklıca & Marianthi Georgalidou
Hesse, Isabelle
Ferré-Pavia, Carme, Marçal Sintes & Catalina Gayà
Muhammed Ali, Nassif
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
