In:The Social Construction of SARS: Studies of a health communication crisis
Edited by John H. Powers and Xiaosui Xiao
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 30] 2008
► pp. 17–31
1. Hong Kong's multiple constructions of SARS
Published online: 12 November 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.30.03pow
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.30.03pow
This chapter identifies five significant interpretive frames which operated in Hong Kong and southern China as the SARS crisis developed in spring 2003. These five frames treated SARS, respectively, as (a) a state secret of the Chinese provincial officials, (b) a scientific mystery to be solved by the scientific community, (c) a medical epidemic that legitimized the use of emergency powers and necessitated the taking of large scale collective actions, (d) a general warning to the community concerning the poor state of public hygiene and, finally, as (e) a government failure that served as a catalyst for social unrest and change. As each frame is described some of the behavioral and actional consequences of using the frame are also indicated.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Xia, Yiming, Changpeng Huan & Alexandra García Marrugo
Takovski, Aleksandar
Ophir, Yotam, Dror Walter, Daniel Arnon, Ayse Lokmanoglu, Michele Tizzoni, Joëlle Carota, LORENZO D'Antiga & Emanuele Nicastro
Chan, Chi Kit
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
