Cover not available

In:The Person in Politics: Pronouns and political personalization in U.S. presidential campaigns
Lilla Petronella Szabó
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 107] 2025
► pp. 174–191

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

References

Published online: 25 August 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.107.refs
Aarts, Bas, Chalker, Sylvia, and Weiner, Edmund. 2014. The Oxford dictionary of English grammar (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aczél Petra. 2009. Új retorika: Közélet, kommunikáció, kampány. Budapest: Kalligram.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adam, Silke, and Michaela Maier. 2010. “Personalization of Politics A Critical Review and Agenda for Research.” Annals of the International Communication Association 34 (1): 213–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Algeo, John. 2006. British or American English? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allen, Wendy. 2007. “Australian Political Discourse: Pronominal Choice in Campaign Speeches.” In Selected Papers from the 2006 Annual Meeting of the Australian Linguistic Society, edited by Ilana Mushin and Mary Laughren, 1–13. University of Queensland. [URL]. Accessed January 13, 2021.
Anthony, Lawrence. 2020. AntConc (Version 3.5.9) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from [URL]
Arbour, Brian. 2014. Candidate-Centered Campaigns. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atia, Renana, and Meital Balmas. 2023. “Between ‘Me, Myself, and I’ and the ‘Royal We’: Gender Differences in Personalized Political Discourse on Facebook and User Involvement.” International Journal of Communication 17: 24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balmas, Meital, Gideon Rahat, Tamir Sheafer, and Shaul R. Shenhav. 2012. “Two Routes to Personalized Politics: Centralized and Decentralized Personalization.” Party Politics 20 (1): 37–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balmas, Michal, and Tamir Sheafer. 2013. “Leaders First, Countries After: Mediated Political Personalization in the International Arena.” Journal of Communication 63, no. 3: 454–475. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Personalization of Politics.” In The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, edited by Gianpietro Mazzoleni, 1–9. John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barcelona, Antonio. 2011. “Reviewing the Properties and Prototype Structure of Metonymy.” In Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View, edited by Réka Benczes, Antonio Barcelona, and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, 7–58. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barcelona Sánchez, Antonio. 2023. “Metonymy-Guided Discourse Inferencing: A Qualitative Study.” Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature 47 (2): 11–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barret, John Q. 2008. Political conventions. The Jackson List. [URL]. Accessed: 12 March 2021.
Bazzanella, Carla. 2002. “The Significance of Context in Comprehension: The `WeCase’.” Foundations of Science 7 (3): 239–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beard, Adrian. 2000. The language of politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Peter. 2024. “Public Trust in Government: 1958–2024.” Pew Research Center. Pew Research Center. June 24. [URL]
Bene, Márton. 2016. “Go Viral on the Facebook! Interactions between Candidates and Followers on Facebook during the Hungarian General Election Campaign of 2014.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (4): 513–529. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bene, Márton, and Fruzsina Nábelek. 2019. “A Politikai Kommunikáció Története a Külföldi Szakirodalomban [The History of Political Communication in the Foreign Literature].” In A Szavakon Túl: Politikai Kommunikáció Magyarországon, 1990–2015, edited by Balázs Kiss, 19–42. Budapest: L’Harmattan Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 1995. Banal Nationalism. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bimes, Terri. 2009. “Understanding the Rhetorical Presidency.” In The Oxford Handbook of the American Presidency, edited by George C. Edwards III and William G. Howell. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blumler, Jay G. 2016. “The Fourth Age of Political Communication.” Politiques de Communication 6 (1): 19–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blumler, Jay G., and Dennis Kavanagh. 1999. “The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features.” Political Communication 16 (3): 209–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blumler, Jay G., David Kavanagh, and Timothy J. Nossiter. 1996. “Modern Communications vs. Traditional Politics in Britain: Unstable Marriage of Convenience.” In Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences, edited by David L. Swanson and Paolo Mancini, 49–72. Praeger. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bøggild, Troels, Rosie Campbell, Marie Kaldahl Nielsen, Helene Helboe Pedersen, and Jennifer Anne van Heerde-Hudson. 2019. “Which Personality Fits Personalized Representation?” Party Politics 27 (2): 269–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borah, Porismita. 2016. “Political Facebook Use: Campaign Strategies Used in 2008 and 2012 Presidential Elections.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13 (4): 326–338. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branham, A. J., and C. Wlezien. 2020. “Do Election Campaigns Matter? A Comparative Perspective and Overview.” In The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion, edited by E. Suhay, B. Grofman, and A. H. Trechsel, 184–200. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brdar, Mario, and Rita Brdar-Szabó. 2009. “The (Non-)Metonymic Use of Place Names in English, German, Hungarian, and Croatian.” In Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar, edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther, Linda L. Thornburg, and Antonio Barcelona, 229–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Metonymy, Metaphor and the ‘Weekend Frame of Mind’: Towards Motivating the Micro-Variation in the Use of One Type of Metonymy.” In Motivation in Grammar and the Lexicon, edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden, 233–250. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brdar-Szabó, Rita, and Mario Brdar. 2021. “Metonymic Indeterminacy and Metalepsis: Getting Two (or More) Targets for the Price of One Vehicle.” In Figurative Language — Intersubjectivity and Usage, edited by Augusto Soares da Silva, 175–212. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brdar, Mario, and Rita Brdar-Szabó. 2022. “Targetting Metonymic Targets.” In Figurative Thought and Language in Action, edited by Mario Brdar and Rita Brdar-Szabó, 16:59–86. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman. 1960. “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity.” In Style in Language, edited by Thomas A. Sebeok, 253–276. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Anita Fetzer. 2006. “Who Are We and Who Are You? The Strategic Use of Forms of Address in Political Interviews,” Text & Talk, 26 (1): 3–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burden, Barry C. and David C. Kimball. 2009. Why Americans split their tickets: Campaigns, competition, and divided government. University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Busse, Beatrix. 2014. “Genre.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, edited by Peter Stockwell and Sara Whiteley, 103–116. Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, and Warren E. Miller. 1957. “The Motivational Basis of Straight and Split Ticket Voting.” American Political Science Review 51 (2): 293–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campus, Donatella. 2013. Women Political Leaders and the Media. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Applying cognitive pragmatics to Critical Discourse Studies: A proximization analysis of three public space discourses.” Journal of Pragmatics 70: 16–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “‘We don’t want any immigrants or terrorists here’: The linguistic manufacturing of xenophobia in the post-2015 Poland.” Discourse & Society, 29 (4): 380–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caprara, Gian Vittorio. 2007. “The Personalization of Modern Politics.” European Review 15 (2): 151–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caspi, Daniel. 1996. “American-Style Electioneering in Israel: Americanisation versus Modernization.” In Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences, edited by David L. Swanson and Paolo Mancini, 173–192. Praeger. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
CAWP. “Share of women in the United States Congress from 1971 to 2023.” Chart. December 28, 2022. Statista. Accessed August 02, 2024. [URL]
Ceaser, James W., Glen E. Thurow, Jeffrey K. Tulis, and Joseph M. Bessette. 1981. “The Rise of the Rhetorical Presidency.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 11, no. 2: 158–171.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chadwick, Andrew. 2017. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chandler, Daniel, and Rod Munday. 2020. A Dictionary of Media and Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chantrill, Peter A., and John S. Mio. 1996. “Metonymy in Political Discourse.” In Metaphor: Implications and Applications, edited by John S. Mio and Anthony N. Katz, 171–184. Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2011. Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Competition Metaphors and Ideology: Life as a Race.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, edited by Ruth Wodak and Bernhard Forchtner, 202–217. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2003. “Deixis and distance: President Clinton’s justification of intervention in Kosovo.” In At War with Words, edited by Mirjana N. Dedaic and Daniel N. Nelson, 95–126. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Vectors, viewpoint and viewpoint shift: Toward a Discourse Space Theory.” In Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Volume 3, edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, 78–116. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, Alan. 1997. “Some Properties and Groupings of Image Schemas.” In Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science. Series 4, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, edited by Marjolijn H. Verspoor, Kee Dong Lee, and Eve Sweetser, 3–15. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clausner, Timothy C. 2005. “Image Schema Paradoxes: Implications for Cognitive Semantics.” In Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Beate Hampe, 93–112. De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coe, Kevin. 2017. “Presidential Address.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication, edited by Kate Kenski and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cosgrove, Ken, and Nathan R. Shrader. 2022. “Political Branding in the USA Election of 2020.” In Political Branding in Turbulent Times, edited by Mona Moufahim, 33–50. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crisp, Brian F., Santiago Olivella, Michael Malecki, and Mindy Sher. 2013. “Vote-Earning Strategies in Flexible List Systems: Seats at the Price of Unity.” Electoral Studies 32 (4): 658–669. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 1989. Why did he say it? English Today 5(1): 41–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. London: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Fina, Anna. 1995. “Pronominal Choice, Identity, and Solidarity in Political Discourse,” Text & Talk, 15 (3): 379–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dickinson, Matthew J. 2014. “The 2012 Presidential Election: Taking the ‘Fun’ Out of Fundamentals?” PS: Political Science & Politics 47 (2): 309–312.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Domonkosi, Ágnes, and Zsófia Ludányi. 2018. “A Társas Deixis Szocializációs Mintái Az Óvodai Bábjátékban: Egy Óvodapedagógus-Képzésben Zajló Kísérlet Tanulságai.” In Kutatás és Innováció a Kárpát-Medencei Oktatási Térben, edited by Péter Tóth, Enikő Maior, Kinga Horváth, András Kautnik, Jenő Duchon, and Bálint Sass, 488–505. Budapest: Óbudai Egyetem Trefort Ágoston Mérnökpedagógiai Központ.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., Matthew J. Kifer, and Michael Parkin. 2009. “The Technological Development of Candidate Web Sites: How and Why Candidates Use Web Innovations.” In Politicking Online: The Transformation of Election Campaign Communications, edited by Costas Panagopoulos, 21–47. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H. and Steven J. Karau. “Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.” Psychological review 109 3 (2002): 573–598.
Ellis, Richard. 1998. “Accepting the Nomination from Martin Van Buren to Franklin Delano Roosevelt.” In Speaking to the People: The Rhetorical Presidency in Historical Perspective, edited by Richard Ellis, 113–133. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Encyclopædia Britannica. 2024. “Primary Election.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Accessed September 1, 2024. [URL]
Enli, Gunn Sara, and Eli Skogerbø. 2013. “Personalized Campaigns In Party-Centred Politics: Twitter and Facebook as Arenas for Political Communication.” Information, Communication & Society 16 (5): 757–774. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erichsen, Kristen, Douglas Schrock, Benjamin Dowd-Arrow, and Pierce Dignam. 2020. “Bitchifying Hillary: Trump Supporters’ Vilification of Clinton during the 2016 Presidential Election.” Social Currents 7 (6): 526–542. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Esser, Frank, and Jörg Matthes. 2013. “Mediatization Effects on Political News, Political Actors, Political Decisions, and Political Audiences.” In Democracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization, edited by Hanspeter Kriesi, Sandra Lavenex, Frank Esser, Jörg Matthes, Marc Bühlmann, and Daniel Bochsler, 177–201. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan, and Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Anna Mauranen. 1997. “The Conversationalisation of Political Discourse.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11 (December): 89–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farkas, Xénia, and Márton Bene. 2020. “Images, Politicians, and Social Media: Patterns and Effects of Politicians’ Image-Based Political Communication Strategies on Social Media.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 26 (1): 119–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farrell, David M., and Paul Webb. 2002. “Political Parties as Campaign Organizations.” In Parties Without Partisans, 102–128. Oxford University Press Oxford. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental spaces: aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Mental Spaces.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens, Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2008. “‘And I Think That Is a Very Straightforward Way of Dealing With It’: The Communicative Function of Cognitive Verbs in Political Discourse.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27 (4): 384–396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “I Think, I Mean and I Believe in Political Discourse.” Functions of Language 21 (1): 67–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, and Peter Bull. 2008. “‘Well, I Answer It by Simply Inviting You to Look at the Evidence.’” Journal of Language and Politics 7 (2): 271–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filardo-Llamas, Laura. 2013. “‘Committed to the ideals of 1916’. The language of paramilitary groups: the case of the Irish Republican Army.” Critical Discourse Studies 10 (1): 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filardo-Llamas, Laura, Christopher Hart, and Bertie Kaal. 2015. “Introduction for the special issue on space, time and evaluation in ideological discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies 12 (3): 235–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1971. “Toward a Theory of Deixis.” The PCCLLU Papers 3/4: 219–241.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1975. Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. Lectures on Deixis. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. 2003. The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frank, Roslyn M. 2008. “Introduction: Sociocultural Situatedness.” In, edited by Roslyn M. Frank, René Dirven, Tom Ziemke, and Enrique Bernárdez, 1–20. De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frantz, Erica, Andrea Kendall-Taylor, Carisa Nietsche, and Joseph Wright. 2021. “How Personalist Politics Is Changing Democracies.” Journal of Democracy 32 (3): 94–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaddini, Katie, and Lucia Figueras-Pont. 2024. “Last Word: Why Kamala Harris Lost.” Political Insight 15 (4): 32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garzia, Diego. 2014. Personalization of politics and electoral change. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Personalization of Politics Between Television and the Internet: Leader Effects in the 2013 Italian Parliamentary Election.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 14 (4): 403–416. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garzia, Diego, and Frederico Ferreira da Silva. 2021. “Negative Personalization and Voting Behavior in 14 Parliamentary Democracies, 1961–2018.” Electoral Studies 71 (June): 102300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garzia, Diego, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, and Andrea de Angelis. 2021. Leaders without Partisans : Dealignment, Media Change, and the Personalization of Politics. ECPR Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garzia, Diego, and Frederico Ferreira da Silva. 2022. “The Electoral Consequences of Affective Polarization? Negative Voting in the 2020 US Presidential Election.” American Politics Research 50(3): 303–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geise, Stephanie, Katharina Maubach, and Alena Boettcher Eli. 2024. “Picture Me in Person: Personalization and Emotionalization as Political Campaign Strategies on Social Media in the German Federal Election Period 2021.” New Media & Society, March, 14614448231224032. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. 2005. Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs Jr., Raymond W., Dinara A. Beitel, Michael Harrington, and Paul E. Sanders. 1994. “Taking a Stand on the Meanings of Stand: Bodily Experience as Motivation for Polysemy.” Journal of Semantics 11 (4): 231–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W., and Herbert L. Colston. 1995. “The Cognitive Psychological Reality of Image Schemas and Their Transformations,” Cognitive Linguistics, 6 (4): 347–378. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giles, David C. 2002. “Parasocial Interaction: A Review of the Literature and a Model for Future Research.” Media Psychology 4 (3): 279–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff, and Anna Wierzbicka. 2021. “‘We’: Conceptual Semantics, Linguistic Typology and Social Cognition.” Language Sciences 83 (January): 101327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1976. “Replies and Responses.” Language in Society 5 (3): 257–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golway, Terry. 2012. American Political Speeches. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Doris Kearns. 1994. No Ordinary Time: Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt: The Home Front in World War II. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, Todd, Daniel Jackson, and Marcel Broersma. 2018. “The Personal in the Political on Twitter: Towards a Typology of Politicians’ Personalized Tweeting Behaviours.” In Managing Democracy in the Digital Age: Internet Regulation, Social Media Use, and Online Civic Engagement, edited by Julia Schwanholz, Todd Graham, and Peter-Tobias Stoll, 137–157. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grady, Joseph. 1997. Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.
Gries, Stefan Th. 2010. “Useful Statistics for Corpus Linguistics.” In A Mosaic of Corpus Linguistics: Selected Approaches, edited by Aquilino Sánchez Pérez and Moisés Almela Sánchez, 269–291. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haßler, Jörg, Anna-Katharina Wurst, and Katharina Pohl. 2024. “Politicians over Issues? Visual Personalization in Three Instagram Election Campaigns.” Information, Communication & Society 27 (5): 815–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hahn, Dan. 1970. “The Effect of Television on Presidential Campaigns.” Today’s Speech 18 (2): 4–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, Louise. 2020. “One Quarter Kamala Harris Nomination Coverage Included Racist or Sexist Stereotypes, Report Says.” The Independent, October 6, 2020. [URL]
Halliday, M. A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halmari, Helena. 2008. “On the Language of the Clinton-Dole Presidential Campaign Debates.” Journal of Language and Politics 7 (2): 247–270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hampe, Beate. 2005. “Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics: Introduction.” In Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Beate Hampe, 1–14. De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamřík, Lukáš. 2020. “Is There Any ‘Price’ for Making Individual EU Politicians More Important? The Personalization of Politics in the European Commission.” Journal of European Integration 43 (4): 403–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2014. Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, Roderick P. 1999. Seducing America: How television charms the modern voter. SAGE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas. 1996. Do campaigns matter? SAGE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holloway, Richard. 2008. “Conventions, Political.” In Encyclopedia of Political Communication, vol. 1, edited by Lynda Lee Kaid and Christina Holtz-Bacha, 135–138. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holtz-Bacha, Christina. 2004. “Germany: How the Private Life of Politicians Got into the Media.” Parliamentary Affairs 57 (1): 41–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008a. “Americanization.” In Encyclopedia of Political Communication, vol. 1, edited by Lynda Lee Kaid and Christina Holtz-Bacha, 32–33. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008b. “Professionalization.” In Encyclopedia of Political Communication, vol. 1, edited by Lynda Lee Kaid and Christina Holtz-Bacha, 657–658. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holtz-Bacha, Christina, Ana Ines Langer, and Susanne Merkle. 2014. “The Personalization of Politics in Comparative Perspective: Campaign Coverage in Germany and the United Kingdom.” European Journal of Communication 29 (2): 153–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horváth, Balázs. 2024. “Retúrjegy a „miénktől” az „enyémig”. A politikai perszonalizáció vizsgálata Orbán Viktor televíziós interjúiban a személyes névmások elemzésén keresztül.” In Utak a nyelvhasználat kutatásában I., edited by Emese Borissza, Zsófia Gömbös, Kata Heller, Anett Osztroluczki, Orsolya Ruzsits, and Sára Török, 35–50. Utak a nyelvhasználat kutatásában ; 1. Budapest: ELTE BTK Alkalmazott nyelvészeti diákműhely.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horváth, Péter, Gábor Simon, and Szilárd Tátrai. 2021. “A Lírai Személyjelölés Konstrukcióinak Annotálási Elveiről.” In Líra, Poétika, Diskurzus, edited by Krisztina Laczkó and Szilárd Tátrai, 133–164. Budapest: ELTE Eötvös József Collegium.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horton, Donald, and R. Richard Wohl. 1956. “Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction: Observations on Intimacy at a Distance.” Psychiatry 19 (3): 215–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howard, Anthony. 2008. “State of the Union Address.” In Encyclopedia of Political Communication, vol. 1, edited by Lynda Lee Kaid and Christine Holtz-Bacha, 762–763. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Yan. 2014. Pragmatics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
H Varga, Márta. 2017. “Kic és mic vogmuc? A többes számú első személyű nyelvi formák funkcionális vizsgálata.” THL2 (1–2): 133–144.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Íñigo-Mora, Isabel. 2004. “On the Use of the Personal Pronoun We in Communities.” Journal of Language and Politics 3 (1): 27–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1995. Beyond the double bind: Women and leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janney, Richard W. 2002. “Cotext as Context: Vague Answers in Court.” Language & Communication 22 (4): 457–475. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jobst, Ágnes. 2007. A mi mint a hatalom és a szolidaritás névmása. Magyar Nyelvőr 131(1): 29–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. A nyelv kisajátítása. A második világháború utáni média elemzése szótárral és szövegmutatványokkal. Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “The Philosophical Significance of Image Schemas.” In Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Beate Hampe, 15–34. De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Embodied mind, meaning, and reason: How our bodies give rise to understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jost, John T., and Joanna Sterling. 2020. “The Language of Politics: Ideological Differences in Congressional Communication on Social Media and the Floor of Congress.” Social Influence 15 (2–4): 80–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jost, Pablo. 2022. “How Politicians Adapt to New Media Logic. A Longitudinal Perspective on Accommodation to User-Engagement on Facebook.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 20 (2): 184–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jurkowitz, Mark, Amy Mitchell, Elisa Shearer, and Mason Walker. 2020. “U.S. Media Polarization and the 2020 Election: A Nation Divided.” Pew Research Center. Pew Research Center. January 24. [URL]
Kalinauskas, Ava. 2024. “Trump Is Plain “Weird”: How Kamala Harris’ Meme-Fied Campaign Is Leveraging Social Media and Gen Z Culture.” The Conversation, August 1, 2024. [URL]
Karapetjana, Indra. 2011. Pronominal choice in political interviews. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture 1(1): 36–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karvonen, Laurie. 2010. The personalisation of politics: a study of parliamentary democracies. ECPR Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keeter, Scott. 1987. “The Illusion of Intimacy Television and The Role of Candidate Personal Qualities in Voter Choice.” Public Opinion Quarterly 51 (3): 344–358. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kernell, Samuel. 2007. Going public: new strategies of presidential leadership. CQ Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kimmel, Michael. 2005. “Culture Regained: Situated and Compound Image Schemas.” In Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Beate Hampe, 285–312. De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Samuel A., William Lyons, and Michael R. Fitzgerald. 1975. “Candidates, Parties, and Issues in The American Electorate Two Decades of Change.” American Politics Quarterly 3 (3): 247–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiss, Balázs. 2003. “Kampány és Tabloidizáció — A Perszonalizáció Jelensége.” In Kampánykommunikáció, edited by Erika Sárközy and Nóra Schleicher, 9–41. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kitagawa, Chisato, and Adrienne Lehrer. 1990. “Impersonal Uses of Personal Pronouns.” Journal of Pragmatics 14 (5): 739–759. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klinger, Ulrike, and Jakob Svensson. 2015. “The Emergence of Network Media Logic in Political Communication: A Theoretical Approach.” New Media and Society 17 (8): 1241–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knuckey, Jonathan, and Adrienne Mathews. 2024. “Racial Resentment, Sexism, and Evaluations of Kamala Harris in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.” Social Science Quarterly 105 (4): 1266–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 1995. “American Friendship and the Scope of Metaphor,” Cognitive Linguistics, 6 (4): 315–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. American English: An introduction. Broadview Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2006. Language, mind, and culture: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán and Réka Benczes. 2010. Kognitív nyelvészet. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán, and Günter Radden. 1998. “Metonymy: Developing a Cognitive Linguistic View,” Cognitive Linguistics, 9 (1): 37–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreis, Ramona. 2017. “The ‘Tweet Politics’ of President Trump.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 607–618. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2011. “Personalization of National Election Campaigns.” Party Politics 18 (6): 825–844. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kruikemeier, Sanne, Guda van Noort, Rens Vliegenthart, and Claes H de Vreese. 2013. “Getting Closer: The Effects of Personalized and Interactive Online Political Communication.” European Journal of Communication 28 (1): 53–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzeszowski, Tomasz. 2011. “The Axiological Parameter in Preconceptional Image Schemata.” In Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language, edited by René Geiger and Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn, 307–330. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuna, Ágnes. 2016. Személydeixis és önreprezentáció az orvos-beteg találkozáson. Magyar Nyelvőr 140(3): 316–332.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laczkó, Krisztina. 2001. Névmás és referencia. Magyar Nyelvőr 125(1): 102–107.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laczkó, Krisztina, and Szilárd Tátrai. 2012. “Személyek és/vagy Dolgok: A Harmadik Személyű és a Mutató Névmási Deixis a Magyarban.” In Konstrukció és Jelentés: Tanulmányok a Magyar Nyelv Funkcionális Kognitív Leírására, edited by Szilárd Tátrai and Gábor Tolcsvai Nagy, 231–257. Budapest: ELTE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “„Évek óta mást se csinálunk.” A Többes Szám Első Személyű Deiktikus Elemek Működésének Vizsgálatához.” In A Nyelv Dimenziói: Tanulmányok Juhász Dezső Tiszteletére, edited by János Bárth, Csaba Bodó, and Zsófia Kocsis, 501–514. Budapest: ELTE BTK Magyar Nyelvtudományi és Finnugor Intézet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Tell Us About the Nature of Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980/2003. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Rafael E. Núñez. 2000. Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1974. “Remarks on ‘This’ and ‘That’.” Papers from the Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society 10: 345–356.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. Talking Power: The Politics of Language in Our Lives. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lang, Kurt, and Gladys E. Lang. 1957. “Television and the Intimate View of Politics.” Journal of Broadcasting 1, no. 1: 47–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2007. “Constructing the Meanings of Personal Pronouns.” In Aspects of Meaning Construction, edited by Günter Radden, Klaus-Michael Köpcke, Thomas Berg, and Peter Siemund, 171–187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langer, Ana Inés. 2007. “A Historical Exploration of the Personalisation of Politics in the Print Media: The British Prime Ministers (1945–1999).” Parliamentary Affairs 60 (3): 371–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “The Politicization of Private Persona: Exceptional Leaders or the New Rule? The Case of the United Kingdom and the Blair Effect.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 15 (1): 60–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langer, John. 1981. “Television’s ‘Personality System.’” Media, Culture & Society 3 (4): 351–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Jayeon, and Young-shin Lim. 2016. “Gendered Campaign Tweets: The Cases of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.” Public Relations Review 42 (5): 849–855. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2004. “Deixis.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by Laurence R. Horn and Gregory L. Ward, 97–121. London: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindsay, James M. 2024. “Election 2024: Kamala Harris Makes Her Case to the Nation.” Council on Foreign Relations. Accessed August 24, 2024. [URL]
Littlemore, Jeannette. 2019. Metaphors in the Mind: Sources of Variation in Embodied Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Amy H. 2022. “Pronoun Usage as a Measure of Power Personalization: A General Theory with Evidence from the Chinese-Speaking World.” British Journal of Political Science 52 (3): 1258–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Louden, Andrew. 2008. “Presidential Communication.” In Encyclopedia of Political Communication, edited by Lynda Lee Kaid and Christina Holtz-Bacha, vol. 1, 632–639. SAGE Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lukács, Ákos, and V. Zoltán Szamarasz. 2014. “Téri Nyelv.” In Pszicholingvisztika [Psycholinguistics], edited by Csaba Pléh and Ákos Lukács, vol. 2, 877–917. Akadémiai Kiadó. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mair, Peter, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Fritz Plasser. 2004. “Conclusion: Political Parties in Changing Electoral Markets.” In Political Parties and Electoral Change Party Responses to Electoral Markets, edited by Peter Mair, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Fritz Plasser, 264–274. SAGE. [URL].
Maitland, Karen, and John Wilson. 1987. “Pronominal Selection and Ideological Conflict.” Journal of Pragmatics 11 (4): 495–512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mancini, Paolo, and David L. Swanson. 1996. “Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: Introduction.” In Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences, edited by David L. Swanson and Paolo Mancini, 1–28. Westport, CT: Praeger. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marino, Bruno, Nicola Martocchia Diodati, and Luca Verzichelli. 2022. “The Personalization of Party Politics in Western Europe (1985–2016): Evidence from an Expert Survey.” Acta Politica 57 (3): 571–596. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marmaridou, Sophia. 2000. Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition. Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, Justin L., and Teenie Matlock. 2011. “Understanding the Link Between Spatial Distance and Social Distance.” Social Psychology 42 (3): 185–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazzoleni, Gianpietro. 2000. “A Return to Civic and Political Engagement Prompted by Personalized Political Leadership?” Political Communication 17 (4): 325–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazzoleni, Gianpietro, and Winfried Schulz. 1999. “‘Mediatization’ of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy?” Political Communication 16 (3): 247–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayer, William G. 2013. “How the Romney Campaign Blew It,” The Forum, 10 (4): 40–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayobre, José A. 1996. “Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: The Case of Venezuela.” In Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences, edited by David L. Swanson and Paolo Mancini, 227–245. Westport: Praeger. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McAllister, Ian. 2007. “The Personalization of Politics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by J. Dalton Russell and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, 571–588. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015a. “Political Leaders in Westminster Systems.” In Political Leaders and Democratic Elections, edited by Kees Aarts, André Blais, and Hermann Schmitt, 52–75. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. “The Personalization of Politics in Australia.” Party Politics 21, no. 3: 337–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGregor, Shannon C. 2017. “Personalization, Social Media, and Voting: Effects of Candidate Self-Personalization on Vote Intention.” New Media & Society 20 (3): 1139–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGregor, Shannon C., Regina G. Lawrence, and Arielle Cardona. 2016. “Personalization, Gender, and Social Media: Gubernatorial Candidates’ Social Media Strategies.” Information Communication and Society 20 (2): 264–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meeks, Lindsey. 2017. “Getting Personal: Effects of Twitter Personalization on Candidate Evaluations.” Politics and Gender. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Metcalf, Allan. 2004. Presidential Voices: Speaking Styles from George Washington to George W. Bush. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Metz, Manon, Sanne Kruikemeier, and Sophie Lecheler. 2019. “Personalization of Politics on Facebook: Examining the Content and Effects of Professional, Emotional and Private Self-Personalization.” Information, Communication & Society 23 (10): 1481–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mochmann, Ines C., and Wolfgang Zenk-Möltgen. 2005. “Appendix 2: The European Voter Data Base.” In The European Voter: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, edited by Jacques Thomassen, 309–312. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moufahim, Mona. 2022. “Introduction: Political Branding in Turbulent Times.” In Political Branding in Turbulent Times, 1–7. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moy, Patricia, Gianpietro Mazzoleni, and Hernán Rojas. 2012. “On the Dichotomies of Political Communication.” International Journal of Communication 6: 241–246.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nave, Nir Noon, Limor Shifman, and Keren Tenenboim-Weinblatt. 2018. “Talking It Personally: Features of Successful Political Posts on Facebook.” Social Media and Society 4 (3). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Negrine, Ralph. 2016. “Americanization.” In The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, edited by Gianpietro Mazzoleni, 1–5. John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oakley, Todd. 2010. “Image Schemas.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohr, David. 2015. “Changing patterns in political communication.” In Political Leaders and Democratic Elections, edited by Kees Aarts, André Blais, and Hermann Schmitt, 11–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohr, David, and Henrik Oscarsson. 2015. “Leader Traits, Leader Image and Vote Choice.” In Political Leaders and Democratic Elections, edited by Kees Aarts, André Blais, and Hermann Schmitt, 187–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne, Brian Clancy, and Susan Adolphs. 2011. Introducing Pragmatics in Use. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Kruk, Amy, and Curt Merrill. 2023. “Tracking Donald Trump’s Indictments.” CNN. Accessed August 24, 2024. [URL]
Olsson, Eva-Karin. 2017. “How Journalists Portray Political Leaders: The Personalization of Prime Ministers and the Connection to Party Affiliation in Swedish News Coverage.” In Putting a Face on It: Individual Exposure and Subjectivity in Journalism, edited by Birgitte Kjos Fonn, Harald Hornmoen, Nathalie Hyde-Clark, and Yngve Benestad Hågvar, 99–119. Cappelen Damm Akademisk/NOASP (Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Otto, Lukas, and Michaela Maier. 2016. “Mediated and Moderated Effects of Personalized Political Communication on Political Trust,” Communications, 41 (1): 21–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pakulski, Jacek, and András Körösényi. 2012. Toward Leader Democracy. London: Anthem Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papp, Zsófia. 2013. Kampány-perszonalizáció Magyarországon a képviselők szemével: Személy-és választókerület-központúság pártközpontú választási rendszerekben. Politikatudományi Szemle 22(4): 37–56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papp, Zsófia, and Burtejin Zorigt. 2016. “Party-Directed Personalisation: The Role of Candidate Selection in Campaign Personalisation in Hungary.” East European Politics 32 (4): 466–486. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parmelee, John H., Stephynie C. Perkins, and Berrin Beasley. 2022. “Personalization of Politicians on Instagram: What Generation Z Wants to See in Political Posts.” Information, Communication & Society 26 (9): 1773–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Passarelli, Gianluca. 2015. “Parties’ Genetic Features: The Missing Link in the Presidentialization of Parties.” In The Presidentialization of Political Parties: Organizations, Institutions and Leaders, edited by Gianluca Passarelli, 1–25. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula. 2014. “Constructing Collectivity with ‘We’: An Introduction.” In Pragmatics & beyond. New Series, edited by Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou, 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pedersen, Helene Helboe, and Gideon Rahat. 2019. “Political Personalization and Personalized Politics within and beyond the Behavioural Arena.” Party Politics 27 (2): 211–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peña-Cervel, María Sandra, and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez. 2022. Figuring out Figuration: A Cognitive Linguistic Account. Vol. 14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair. 1994. “The Politics of Pronouns.” ELT Journal 48 (2): 173–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perloff, Richard M. 1998. Political Communication: Politics, Press, and Public in America. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. “Elite, Popular, and Merchandised Politics: Historical Origins of Presidential Campaign Marketing.” In Handbook of Political Marketing, edited by Bruce I. Newman, 19–40. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. The Dynamics of Political Communication: Media and Politics in a Digital Age. 1st ed. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2021. The Dynamics of Political Communication: Media and Politics in a Digital Age. 3rd ed. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petersoo, Pille. 2007. “What Does ‘We’ Mean?” Journal of Language and Politics 6 (3): 419–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinkleton, Bruce. 2008. “Negative Campaigning.” In Encyclopedia of Political Communication, edited by Lynda Lee Kaid and Christina Holtz-Bacha, vol. 1, 489–489. SAGE Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plasser, Fritz. 2008. “Political Consulting Worldwide.” In Routledge Handbook of Political Management, edited by David W. Johnson, 40–57. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plasser, Fritz, and Gerald Lengauer. 2008. “Television Campaigning Worldwide.” In Routledge Handbook of Political Management, edited by David W. Johnson, 253–271. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson, Aaron Wildavsky, Steven Schier, and David Hopkins. 2016. Presidential Elections: Strategies and Structures of American Politics. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Proctor, Katarzyna, and Lily I.Wen Su. 2011. “The 1st Person Plural in Political Discourse — American Politicians in Interviews and in a Debate.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (13): 3251–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pruysers, Scott, and William Cross. 2016. “Research Note: ‘Negative’ Personalization: Party Leaders and Party Strategy.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 539–558. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quinlan, Stephen, and Ian McAllister. 2021. “Leader or Party? Quantifying and Exploring Behavioral Personalization 1996–2019.” Party Politics 28 (1): 24–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rahat, Gideon, and Reuven Y. Hazan. 2001. “Candidate Selection Methods: An Analytical Framework.” Party Politics 7 (3): 297–322. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rahat, Gideon and Ofer Kenig. 2018. From Party Politics to Personalized Politics?: Party Change and Political Personalization in Democracies. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rahat, Gideon, and Tamir Sheafer. 2007. “The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel, 1949–2003.” Political Communication 24 (1): 65–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin. 2008. “Rhetoric of Political Speeches.” In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, edited by Ruth Wodak and Veronika Koller, 243–269. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reitan, Earl A. 2003. The Thatcher revolution: Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair, and the transformation of modern Britain, 1979–2001. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ritter, Kurt W. 1980. “American Political Rhetoric and the Jeremiad Tradition: Presidential Nomination Acceptance Addresses, 1960–1976.” Central States Speech Journal 31 (3): 153–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Robert North, & Hammond, Scott John. 2004. Encyclopedia of presidential campaigns, slogans, issues, and platforms. Greenwood Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robertson, Nick. 2024. “These Major Media Outlets Have Called for Biden to Drop Out.” The Hill, June 30, 2024. [URL]
Römmele, Andrea, and Dirk von Schneidmesser. 2016. “Election Campaigning Enters a Fourth Phase: The Mediatized Campaign.” Zeitschrift Für Politikwissenschaft 26 (4): 425–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco, and Olga Isabel Díez Velasco. 2004. “Motivation in Anaphoric Reference.” In Studies in Linguistic Motivation, edited by Günter Radden and Klaus-Uwe Panther, 293–320. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russmann, Uta, Ulrike Klinger, and Karolina Koc-Michalska. 2024. “Personal, Private, Emotional? How Political Parties Use Personalization Strategies on Facebook in the 2014 and 2019 EP Election Campaigns.” Social Science Computer Review. SAGE Publications Inc. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salamurović, Aleksandra. 2020. “Metonymy and the Conceptualisation of Nation in Political Discourse,” Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 8 (1): 181–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salek, Thomas A. 2014. “Faith Turns Political on the 2012 Campaign Trail: Mitt Romney, Franklin Graham, and the Stigma of Nontraditional Religions in American Politics.” Communication Studies 65 (2): 174–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schröter, Melani. 2014. “Addressee Orientation in Political Speeches.” Journal of Language and Politics 13 (2): 289–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, Elena. 2008. Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack. 2009. “Deixis.” In Key Notions for Pragmatics, vol. 1 of Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights, edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman, 114–138. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 2013. “Gender Distinctions in Independent Personal Pronouns.” In WALS Online (v2020.3), edited by Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath. Zenodo. . Available online at [URL]. Accessed September 1, 2024.
Simon, Gábor. 2017. Áttekintés a műfajkutatás tendenciáiról és lehetőségeiről. Útban egy kognitív szemléletű műfajelmélet felé. Magyar Nyelv 113(2): 146–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Aaron. 2009. “The Internet’s Role in Campaign 2008.” Pew Research Center. Pew Research Center. April 15. [URL]
Sorrentino, Jasmin, Martha Augoustinos, and Amanda LeCouteur. 2021. “‘Deal Me in’: Hillary Clinton and Gender in the 2016 US Presidential Election.” Feminism & Psychology 32 (1): 23–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanyer, James. 2007. Modern Political Communication. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Candidate-Centered Communication.” In Encyclopedia of Political Communication, edited by Lynda Lee Kaid and Christina Holtz-Bacha, vol. 1, 81–83. SAGE Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard. 1999. “Genres of Discourse and the Definition of Literature.” Discourse Processes 28 (2): 109–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sterling, Christopher H. 2002. “The fireside chats” — President Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933–1944). Library of Congress. [URL]. Accessed 18 December 2020.
Suleiman, Camelia, Daniel C. O’Connell, and Sabine Kowal. 2002. “‘If You and I, If We, in This Later Day, Lose That Sacred Fire…’: Perspective in Political Interviews.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31 (3): 269–287. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szabó, Lilla Petronella. 2020. “Én és a pártom: A Politikai Kommunikáció Perszonalizációja a Személyes Névmások Tükrében.” In Doktoranduszok Tanulmányai az Alkalmazott Nyelvészet Köréből 2020. XIV. Alkalmazott Nyelvészeti Doktoranduszkonferencia, edited by Tamás Váradi, Zsófia Ludányi, and Tekla Etelka Gráczi, 106–115. Nyelvtudományi Intézet. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021a. “Félelem És Rettegés a Fehér Házban. Metaforák Donald Trump 2020-as Kampánybeszédeiben.” ARGUMENTUM 17: 726–746. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szabó, Lilla Petronella. 2021b. We the people? A perszonalizáció nyelvészeti vizsgálata az Amerikai Egyesült Államok politikai kommunikációjában. JEL-KÉP 2021(2): 93–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szabó, Lilla Petronella. 2022. Personalization is in the details. Studia Linguistica Hungarica 34(1): 102–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2024. “Is This Us? The Cultural Conceptualization of Individualization in American Political Speeches.” In Cultural Linguistics and the Social World, edited by Judit Baranyiné Kóczy, Diana Prodanović Stankić, and Olga Panić Kavgić, 93–111. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2025. “Making a Cardinal Point: The Conceptualization of EAST and WEST in Hungarian Public Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol 40 (2): 140–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12(1): 49–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. The Targeting System of Language. The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Targeting in Language: Unifying Deixis and Anaphora. Frontiers in Psychology 11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tan, Kevin Y. L. 2017. “Presidential Systems.” In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by Rüdiger Wolfrum, Frauke Lachenmann, and Rainer Grote. Oxford University Press. Accessed January 25, 2021. [URL]
Tanabe, Karin. 2011. “Patti Davis on Rebelling against Reagan — Politico.” Patti Davis on Rebelling against Reagan. POLITICO. December 12. [URL]
Tátrai, Szilárd. 2010. Áttekintés a deixisről (funkcionális kognitív kiindulópontból). Magyar Nyelvőr 134(2): 211–233.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Bevezetés a pragmatikába: Funkcionális kognitív megközelítés. Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Attitude, comparison, and relation in style. Remarks on the socio-cultural factors of style. Studia Linguistica Hungarica 28: 21–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017a. “Esti Kornél És a Beégés. Megjegyzések a Műfajiság Pragmatikai Vonatkozásaihoz.” Magyar Nyelv 113 (3): 290–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017b. Pragmatika. In Nyelvtan, 857–1058. Edited by András Imrényi, Nóra Kugler, Mária Ladányi, Alexandra Markó, Szilárd Tátrai, and Gábor Tolcsvai Nagy. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. “On the Perspectival Nature and the Metapragmatic Reflectiveness of Contextualization.” Studia Linguistica Hungarica 32: 109–120.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tátrai, Szilárd, and Júlia Ballagó. 2020. “On Socio-Cultural Situatedness in Style Attribution: A Study of Style in Hungarian.” New Horizons in English Studies 2020 (5): 3–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teten, Ryan L. 2003. “Evolution of the Modern Rhetorical Presidency: Presidential Presentation and Development of the State of the Union Address.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 33 (2): 333–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, John B. 1995. The media and modernity: A social theory of the media. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thurber, James. 2000. “Introduction to the Study of Campaign Consultants.” In Campaign Warriors: Political Consultants in Elections, edited by James Thurber and Candice Nelson, 1–9. Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen. 2017. “Facework and (Im)Politeness in Political Exchanges.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, edited by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 739–758. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trent, J. S., C. Short-Thompson, P. A. Mongeau, and M. S. Metzler. 2017. “The Consistent Attributes of the Ideal Presidential Candidate in an Increasingly Divided Electorate.” American Behavioral Scientist 61 (3): 278–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Troy, Gil. 1996. See How They Ran: The Changing Role of the Presidential Candidate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tulis, Jeffrey. 2017. The rhetorical presidency. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, Mark. 1991. Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Twiplomacy. (July 20, 2020). World leaders with the most Twitter followers as of June 2020 [Graph]. In Statista. Retrieved July 24, 2024, from [URL]
Unger, Peter. 1971. “A Defense of Skepticism.” The Philosophical Review 80 (2): 198–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urban, Greg. 1986. “Rhetoric of a War Chief.” Working Papers and Proceedings of the Center for Psychosocial Studies 5: 1–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Aelst, Peter, Tamir Sheafer, and James Stanyer. 2011. “The Personalization of Mediated Political Communication: A Review of Concepts, Operationalizations and Key Findings.” Journalism 13 (2): 203–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Aelst, Peter, Tamir Sheafer, Nicolas Hubé, and Stylianos Papathanassopoulos. 2016. “Personalization.” In Comparing Political Journalism, edited by Claes de Vreese, Frank Esser, and David Nicolas Hopmann, 112–130. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Erkel, Patrick F., Peter Thijssen, and Peter Van Aelst. 2016. “One for All or All for One: The Electoral Effects of Personalized Campaign Strategies.” Acta Politica 52 (3): 384–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Santen, Rosa, and Liesbet Van Zoonen. 2010. “The Personal in Political Television Biographies.” Biography 33 (1): 46–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Zoonen, Liesbet. 1998. “‘Finally, I Have My Mother Back’: Politicians and Their Families in Popular Culture.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 3 (1): 48–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Zoonen, Liesbet, and Christina Holtz-Bacha. 2000. “Personalisation in Dutch and German Politics: The Case of Talk Show.” Javnost — The Public 7 (2): 45–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verdegem, Pieter, and Evelien D’heer. 2017. “Social Media Logic and Its Impact on Political Communication during Election Times.” In Managing Democracy in the Digital Age: Internet Regulation, Social Media Use, and Online Civic Engagement, 119–135. Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 1999. Understanding pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vile, M. J. C. 2008. Politics in the USA. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vuckovic, Milica. 2023. Politicizing, Personalizing, and Mobilizing in Online Political Communication: Drivers and Killers of Users’ Engagement. International Journal of Communication no.17: 3033–3053. [URL]
Wales, Katie. 1996. Personal pronouns in present-day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. A Dictionary of Stylistics. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ward, Myah. 2024. “For Years She Was Vice President Harris. Now She’s Kamala.” Politico. Accessed August 23, 2024. [URL]
Ware, Alan. 2002. The American Direct Primary: Party Institutionalization and Transformation in the North. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1991. The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. “Elections: Personal Popularity in U.S. Presidential Elections.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 34 (1): 143–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. “US Party Leaders: Exploring the Meaning of Candidate-Centred Politics.” In Political Leaders and Democratic Elections, edited by Kees Aarts, André Blais, and Hermann Schmitt, 76–90. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wei, J. M. (2023). Politicians’ pronouns: Who is “we”? Negotiating national collectivities in Taiwan’s authoritarian period. In L. L. Paterson (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Pronouns (pp. 365–377). Taylor and Francis. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weimann, Gabriel. 2008. “American-Style Campaigning.” In Encyclopedia of Political Communication, edited by L. L. Kaid and C. Holtz-Bacha, vol. 1, 34–35. SAGE Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, John. 1990. Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, Bodo and Teenie Matlock. 2017. “Primary Metaphors Are Both Cultural and Embodied.” In Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse, edited by Beate Hampe, 99–116. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher. 2014. “Election Campaigns.” In Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in a Changing World, edited by Lawrence LeDuc, Richard G. Niemi, and Pippa Norris, vol. 4, 76–95. London: SAGE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Translated by Angelika Hirsch, Richard Mitten, and J. W. Unger. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolfsfeld, Gadi. 2004. Media and the Path to Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zittel, Thomas, and Dominic Nyhuis. 2021. “The Legislative Effects of Campaign Personalization: An Analysis on the Legislative Behavior of Successful German Constituency Candidates.” Comparative Political Studies 54 (2): 312–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zupnik, Yael-Janette. 1994. “A Pragmatic Analysis of the Use of Person Deixis in Political Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 21 (4): 339–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yaniv, Naama Weiss, and Keren Tenenboim-Weinblatt. 2016. “Politically Relevant Intimacy: A Conceptual and Empirical Investigation.” International Journal of Communication 10: 5186–5205.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue