In:News with an Attitude: Ideological perspectives in the historical press
Edited by Claudia Claridge
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 105] 2025
► pp. 56–81
Chapter 4Inducing sympathies and antipathies
A corpus-assisted analysis of letters from the 1857–1858 Indian uprisings in the press
Published online: 16 January 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.105.04sam
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.105.04sam
Abstract
Conflicts have always been highly newsworthy. They receive massive coverage while inducing readers’
sympathies or antipathies, depending on which party in conflict they identify with. By adopting a corpus-assisted
approach integrated with discourse analysis, this study focuses on how, in a small corpus of letters published in the
press during the 1857–58 uprisings in India, the most frequent keywords and collocation patterns represent the events.
The emerging data indicate how language is used to generate emotive reactions towards the Indian rebels in the
readership, while legitimising the East India Company officials’ actions with the purpose of developing a sense of
shared beliefs in an English identity across the empire by connecting personal concerns to a wider sense of public
engagement.
Keywords: letters, press, uprisings, sepoys, ideology, emotivity, identity, corpus linguistics, semantic patterns, colonialism
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The historical, religious, political and geographical context
- 3.Letters and ideology in the 1857–58 British press
- 4.Corpus and methods
- 5.Analysis
- 5.1Cawnpore
- 5.2Sepoys
- 5.3We
- 6.Concluding remarks
Notes References
References (84)
Primary sources
British Newspaper
Archive. “British Newspaper
Archive,” British Newspaper
Archive, accessed October 2022, [URL].
Secondary sources
Ambrosi, Eugenio and Mariselda Testolin Tessarolo. 1991. Dalla parte del Lettore. Ricerca sulla Posta dei Quotidiani
Italiani. Rome: Edizioni Lavoro.
Anderson, Benedict. 2020. Imagined
Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. New York:Routledge.
Andersson, Thorsten. 1994. “The
Existential Conditions of
Place-names.” In Place-Names Worthy of Caring
For. Papers Read at the Symposium Place-name Culture Organised by the National Heritage Board (Stockholm
5–7 May 1993), ed. by Ulfsparre Göran, 7–21. Stockholm: Riksantikvarieämbetet.
Baczynski, Roman. 1987. Discontent
and Liberal Opinion: Non Partisan Readers’ Letters to British Local Newspapers since the Late
1960's. London: Metaballon Books.
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, and Tony McEnery. 2013. Discourse
Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British
Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bates Crispin, and Andrea Major. 2013. Mutiny
at the Margins: New Perspectives on the Indian Uprising of 1857. Britain and the Indian
Uprising. Los Angeles: Sage.
Bednarek, Monika. 2010. “Evaluation
in the News: A Methodological Framework for Analysing Evaluative Language in
Jurnalism.” Australian Journal of
Communication 37 (2): 15–50.
Billig, Michael. 1973. “Normative
Communication in a Minimal Intergroup Situation.” European Journal of
Social
Psychology 3 (3): 339–343.
Blunt, Alison. 2000. “Embodying
War: British Women and Domestic Defilement in the Indian ‘Mutiny’,
1857–58.” Journal of Historical
Geography 26 (3): 403–28.
Bondi, Marina, and Giuliana Diani. 2015. “I
am Wild About Cabbage: Evaluative ‘Semantic Sequences’ and Cross-Linguistic
(Dis)Similarities.” Nordic Journal of English
Studies 14 (1): 116–51.
Brant, Clare. 2006. Eighteenth-Century
Letters and British
Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bromley, Michael. 2018. “‘Watching
the Watchdogs’? The Role of Readers’ Letters in Calling the Press to
Account.” In Sex, Lies and Democracy. The Press
and the Public, ed. by Hugh Stephenson, and Michael Bromley, 147–162.. London: Routledge.
Brownlees, Nicholas, Gabriella Del Lungo, and John Denton (eds.). 2010. The
Language of Public and Private Communication in a Historical
Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Cavanagh, Allison. 2019. “Letters
to the Editor as a Tool of
Citizenship.” In Letters to the Editor.
Comparative and Historical Perspectives, ed. by Allison Cavanagh and John Steel, 89–108. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chapman, Jane. 2013. Gender,
Citizenship and Newspapers: Historical and Transatlantic
Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dawson, Graham. 1995. “The
Imperial Adventure Hero and British Masculinity: The Imagining of Sir Henry
Havelock.” In Gender and
Colonialism, ed. by Timothy Foley, Lionel Pilkington, Sean Ryde et al., 46–59. Galway: Galway University Press.
Duszak, Anna. 2002. “Us
and Others: An Introduction.” In Us and Others.
Social Identities across Languages, Discourses and Cultures [Pragmatics and Beyond
New Series], ed. by Anna Duszak, 1–28. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Dutta, Sunasir, and Hayagreeva Rao. 2015. “Infectious
Diseases, Contamination Rumors and Ethnic Violence: Regimental Mutinies in the Bengal Native Army in 1857
India.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes 129: 36–47.
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2002. The
Familiar Letter in Early Modern English: A Pragmatic
Approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Gregory, Luke and Brett Hutchins. 2004. “Everyday
Editorial Practices and the Public Sphere: Analysing the Letters to the Editor Page of a Regional
Newspaper.” Media International
Australia 112 (1), 186–200.
Hampton, Mark. 2004. Visions
of the Press in Britain,
1850–1950. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Helleland, Botolv. 2012. “Place
Names and Identities.” In Names and
Identities, ed. by Botolv Helleland, Christian-Emil Ore and Solveig Wikstrøm. Oslo
Studies in
Language 4 (2): 95–116.
Hiltunen, Turo, and Lucia Loureiro-Porto. 2020. “Democratization
of Englishes: Synchronic and Diachronic Approaches.” Language
Sciences. 79: 1–8.
Hunston, Susan. 2008. “Starting
with the Small Words: Patterns, Lexis and Semantic
Sequences.” International Journal of Corpus
Linguistics 13(3): 271–295.
Hunston, Susan, and Geoffrey Thompson (eds.). 2000. Evaluation
in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of
Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jackson, Ian. 1971. The
Provincial Press and the
Community. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Jensen, Sune Qvotrup. 2011. “Othering,
Identity Formation and Agency.” Qualitative
Studies 2 (2): 63–78.
Jones, Aled. 2016. Powers
of the Press. Newspapers, Power and the Public in Nineteenth-Century
England. London: Routledge.
Knopf Christina M. 2014. “Sense-making
and Map-making: War Letters as Personal Geographies.” NANO: New American
Notes
Online 1 (6): 1–16.
Levelt, Willem J. M. 1996. “Perspective
Taking and Ellipsis in Spatial
Descriptions.” In Language and
Space, ed. by Paul Bloom, Mary A. Peterson, Lynn Nadel et al., 77–107. Cambridge-London: MIT Press.
Lombardo, Linda. 2009. “Introduction:
Establishing Guidelines for the Use of Corpora as Resources for Learners (and their
Teachers).” In Using Corpora to Learn about
Language and Discourse, ed. by Linda Lombardo, 7–37. Bern: Peter Lang.
Martini, Isabella. 2022. “Language
and Conflict in the Armenian Genocide. A Linguistic Analysis of Letters to the Editor of The
Times.” LEA-Lingue e Letterature d'Oriente e
d'Occidente 11: 95–112.
Mautner, Gerlinde. 2016. “Checks
and Balances: How Corpus Linguistics Can Contribute to
CDA.” In Methods of Critical Discourse
Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 154–79. London: Sage Publications.
McEnery, Anthony and Helen, Baker. 2016. Corpus
Linguistics and 17th-Century Prostitution. Computational Linguistics and
History. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
McNair, Brian. 2000. ”Journalism
and Democracy: A Millennial Audit.” Journalism
Studies 1 (2): 197–211.
Nielsen, Danielle. 2020. “Remembering
the 1857 Indian Uprising in Civic
Celebrations.” In Cultures of Memory in the
Nineteenth Century. Consuming Commemoration, ed. by Katherine H. Grenier and Amanda R. Mushal, 183–201. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nohrstedt, Stig. A. 2009. “New War
Journalism. Trends and Challenges.” Nordicom
Review 30 (1): 95–112.
Ochs, Elinor, Carolyn Taylor, Dina Rudolph, et al. 1992. “Storytelling
as Theory-Building Activity.” Discourse
Processes 15: 37–72.
Pahta, P. and Taavitsainen, I. 2010. “Scientific
Discourse.” In Historical
Pragmatics, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen, 549–586. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pahta, Päivi, Minna Nevala, and Arja Nurmi et al. (eds). 2010. Social
Roles and Language Practices in Late Modern
English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Partington, Alan. 2004. “Corpora
and Discourse, a Most Congruous
Beast.” In Corpora and
Discourse, ed. by Alan Partington, John Morley and Louann Haarman, 11–20. Bern-Oxford: Peter Lang.
. 2010. “Modern
Diachronic Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies (MD-CADS) on UK Newspapers: An Overview of the
Project.” Corpora 5 (2): 83–108.
Partington, Alan, Alison Duguid, and Charlotte Taylor. 2013. Patterns
and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and practice in Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies
(CADS). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Randall, Don. 2003. “Autumn
1857: The Making of the Indian ‘Mutiny’.” Victorian Literature and
Culture 31 (1): 3–17.
Rӧmer, Ute. 2010. “Establishing
the Phraseological Profile of a Text Type: The Construction of Meaning in Academic Book
Reviews.” English Text
Construction 3 (1): 95–119.
Sadeghi, Bahador, Mohammad Taghi Hassani, and Vahid Jalali. 2014. “Towards
(De-)legitimation Discursive Strategies in News Coverage of Egyptian Protest: VOA & Farsi news in
focus.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral
Sciences 98: 1580–1589.
Samson, Christina. 2020a. “The
Whole of Bengal is in Revolt. A Corpus-based Analysis of Letters from the 1857–58 Mutinies in
India.” Lingue e
Linguaggi 36: 283–296.
. 2020b. “From
Private to Public: Letters Contextualising the 1857–58 Mutiny in the British
Press.” Token. A Journal of English
Linguistics 10: 59–80.
Samson, Christina, and Birte Bös. 2021. “Introduction.” Token.
A Journal of English
Linguistics 12: 5–14.
Samson, Christina. 2022. “Expressing
Conflicts. Semantic Patterns Typifying Letters in the British Press.” LEA-Lingue e Letterature d'Oriente e
d'Occidente 11: 79–94.
Sinclair, John M. 1992. “The
Automatic Analysis of Corpora.” Directions in Corpus Linguistics.
Proceedings of Nobel
Symposium 82: 379–397.
Sinclair, John. M. 1996. “The
Empty Lexicon.” International Journal of Corpus
Linguistics 1 (1): 99–119.
Singh, Baljit. 2022. “The
Revolt of 1857 Reasons of Genesis: A Study.” EPRA International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research
(IJMR) 8 (10): 269–272.
Sommer, Michael. 2011. “Colonies —
Colonisation — Colonialism: A Typological Reappraisal.” Ancient West and
East 10: 183–193.
Strani, Katerina, and Anna Szczepaniak-Kozak. 2018. “Strategies
of Othering through Discursive Practices: Examples from the UK and
Poland.” Lodz Papers in
Pragmatics 14 (1): 163–179.
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2018. “Scholastic
Genre Scripts in English Medical Writing
1375–1800.” In Diachronic Corpora, Genre, and
Language Change, ed. by Richard J. Whitt, 93–116.Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Thompson John B. 2013. Ideology and Modern
Culture: Critical Social Theory in the Era of Mass Communication, Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena. 2001. Corpus
Linguistics at
Work, Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Tunstall, Jeremy. 1977. “Editorial
Sovereignty in the British Press: Its Past and
Present.” In Studies on the
Press [Royal Commission on the Press Working Paper No.
3], ed. by Oliver Boyd-Barrett, Colin Seymour-Ure and Jeremy Tunstall, 249–341. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
van Dijk, Teun A. 2006. “Ideology
and Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Political
Ideologies 11 (2): 115–140.
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2007. “Legitimation
in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse &
Communication 1 (1): 91–112.
Vaughan, Elaine, and Brian Clancy. 2013. “Small
Corpora and Pragmatics.” In Yearbook of Corpus
Linguistics and Pragmatics, ed. by Jesús Romero-Trillo, 53–73. Dordrecht: Springer.
Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin. 2004. “Playground
of the Pundits or Voice of the People? Comparing British and Danish Opinion
Pages.” Journalism
Studies 5 (1): 59–70.
Ward, Andrew. 1996. Our
Bones Are Scattered. The Cawnpore Massacres and the Indian Mutiny of
1857. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Warren, Lynne. 2000. “‘Women
in Conference’: Reading the Correspondence Columns in Woman
1890–1910.” In Nineteenth-Century Media and the
Construction of Identities, ed. by Laurel Brake, Bill Bell, and David Finkelstein, 122–134. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
