In:News with an Attitude: Ideological perspectives in the historical press
Edited by Claudia Claridge
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 105] 2025
► pp. 33–55
Chapter 3Representing Ireland and the Irish in the 17th- and 18th-century English press
Published online: 16 January 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.105.03cla
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.105.03cla
Abstract
The treatment of Ireland in the London press from 1640 to 1800 is investigated with the help of the
ZEN and Lampeter corpora, following up on De
Nie’s (2004) hypothesis that views of the Irish could have functioned as a foil for creating a British
identity. Mentions of the Irish and Irish affairs matters are not only very infrequent, but also are of a nature to
deny agency to the Irish. Within this picture of discursive neglect, apparently based on true English disinterest,
three aspects stand out, which partly contribute to (unsystematic) othering: (i) Irish Catholicism, styled as hostile
to Britain, (ii) a set of mocking stereotypes, and (iii) Ireland seen as subservient to the economic interests of
England.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Group identities and their uses
- 2.1National groups in focus: The English and the Irish
- 3.Data and methodology
- 3.1Newspapers and pamphlets
- 3.2Corpuslinguistic approach
- 4.Representations in the press
- 4.1Collocational Patterns
- 4.2Syntactic patterns
- 5.Conclusion
Notes References
References (19)
Primary sources
Lampeter Corpus of Early Modern English
Tracts. 1999. Compiled by Josef Schmied, Claudia Claridge, and Rainer Siemund.
Secondary sources
Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined
Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Revised
edition. London/New York: Verso.
Bourhis, Richard Y. and Anne Maass. 2005. „Linguistic Prejudice and Stereotypes / Linguistisches Vorurteil und
Stereotyp.“ In Sociolinguistics: An International
Handbook of the Science of Language and Society, ed. by Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus J. Mattheier, Peter Trudgill, 1587–1602. Berlin and New York: Walter De Gruyter.
Culpeper, Jonathan and Alison Findlay. 2020. “National
Identities in the Context of Shakespeare’s Henry V: Exploring Contemporary Understandings
through Collocations.” Language and
Literature 29 (3): 203–222.
De Nie, Michael. 2004. “Britannia‘s
Sick Sister: Irish Identity and the British Press,
1798–1882.” In Writing Irishness in
Nineteenth-Century British Culture, ed. by Neil McCaw, 173–193. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Fries, Udo. 2009. Zurich
English Newspaper Corpus. Corpus Resource Database: [URL].
Gat, Azar, and Alexander Yakobson. 2013. Nations.
The Long History and Deep Roots of Political Ethnicity and
Nationalism. Cambridge: CUP.
Heller, Monica. 2005. “Language and Identity / Sprache und
Identität.” In Sociolinguistics: An International
Handbook of the Science of Language and Society, ed. by Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus J. Mattheier, Peter Trudgill, 1582–1586. Berlin and New York: Walter De Gruyter.
Hirschi, Caspar. 2012. The
Origins of Nationalism. An Alternative History from Ancient Rome to Modern
Germany. Cambridge: CUP.
Jensen, Lotte. 2016. “The
roots of Nationalism: An Introduction.“ In The
Roots of Nationalism. National Identity Formation in Early Modern Europe,
1600–1815, ed. by Lotte Jensen, 9–27. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Kidd, Colin. 1999. British
Identities before Nationalism. Ethnicity and Nationhood in the Atlantic World,
1600–1800. Cambridge: CUP.
Leerssen, Joep. 2006. National
Thought in Europe. A Cultural
History. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Prentice, Sheryl and Andrew Hardie. 2009. “Empowerment
and Disempowerment in the Glencairn Uprising: A Corpus-based Critical Analysis of Early Modern English
News Discourse.” Journal of Historical
Pragmatics 10.1: 23–55.
Sommerville, John C. 1996. The News
Revolution in England. Cultural Dynamics of Daily Information. New York/Oxford: OUP.
Strani, Katerina and Anna Szczepaniak-Kozak. 2018. “Strategies
of Othering through Discursive Practices: Examples from the UK and
Poland.” Lodz Papers in
Pragmatics 14 (1): 163–179.