Cover not available

In:Cultural Linguistics and Critical Discourse Studies
Edited by Monika Reif and Frank Polzenhagen
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 103] 2023
► pp. 52–104

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Opening the thinkgates?

The discourse dynamics of migration metaphors in online debates

 | University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU)
Published online: 9 November 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.103.03rei
Abstract
This corpus study investigates the uptake and (non-)continuation of metaphors and metaphor scenarios related to migration/migrants in news reader comment sections of selected British broadsheets and tabloids. It is shown how scenarios are modified and aspects of the source domain foregrounded/backgrounded in order to serve the argumentative interests of the respective writers. At the same time, potential correlations between specific conceptual metaphors and argumentative topoi are analysed, with a particular focus on mixed metaphors. It is argued that the combinations of conceptual metaphors found in instances of mixed metaphor often create cognitive dissonance, but that the wish for dramatic effect through exaggeration appears to justify the merger of two seemingly incompatible metaphors. The argumentative aim thus seems to be more important than the internal coherence of the mixed metaphor itself. With regard to the use of concrete metaphorical linguistic expressions, the corpus data further reveal that language users repeatedly draw on specific lexical items linked to a restricted area of the source domain. It is not surprising, therefore, that the discourse surrounding the topic of migration comes across as highly conventionalised at times, especially within socio-political echo chambers.
Article outline
  • 1.Introductory remarks
  • 2.Analysing metaphors in dynamic, computer-mediated discourse: Critical Discourse Analysis, conceptual blending and metaphor shifting
  • 3.Empirical study
    • 3.1Data, research questions and methodology
    • 3.2Results
      • 3.2.1Overview of source domains and topoi
        • 3.2.1.1Conventionalised metaphors
        • 3.2.1.2Novel creations and less established metaphors
      • 3.2.2Mixed metaphors and their argumentative function
      • 3.2.3Metaphor continuation strategies in reader comments
  • 4.Discussion, conclusion and outlook
  • Notes
  • References
References (126)
References
Andrighetto, Luca, Paolo Riva, Alessandro Gabbiadini, et al.. (2016). Excluded from all humanity: Animal metaphors exacerbate the consequences of social exclusion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35(6), pp. 628–644. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ARTICLE 19 (2003). What’s the story? Results from research into media coverage of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK. [[URL] accessed 23/09/2019].
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony Mc Enery & Ruth Wodak (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), pp. 273–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnden, John (2016). Mixed metaphor. Its depth, its breadth, and a pretence-based approach. In: Raymond W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing Metaphor (pp. 75–111). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ben David, Anat & Oren Soffer (2019). User comments across platforms and journalistic genres. Information, Communication & Society, 22(12), pp. 1810–1829. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bennett, Samuel (2016). New ‘crises’, old habits: Online interdiscursivity and intertextuality in UK migration policy discourses. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 16, Special Issue: The Mediatization and Politicization of the Refugee Crisis in Europe, pp. 140–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bleasdale, Lydia (2008). Under attack: The metaphoric threat of asylum seekers in public-political discourses. Web Journal of Current Legal Issues, 1. [[URL] accessed 23/09/2019].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boeva, Alyona (2006). Discursive construction of refugees, migrants and asylum seekers in British and American news sources. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 236, pp. 53–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braun, Joshua & Tarleton Gillespie (2011). Hosting the public discourse, hosting the public. Journalism Practice, iFirst Article, pp. 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bucher, Hans-Jürgen (2019). Politische Meinungsbildung in sozialen Medien? Interaktionsstrukturen in der Twitter-Kommunikation. In: Konstanze Marx & Axel Schmidt (Eds.), Interaktion und Medien. Interaktionsanalytische Zugänge zu medienvermittelter Kommunikation (pp. 287–317). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Heather A. & Diane F. Halpern (2020). Critical thinking impacts our everyday lives. In: Robert J. Sternberg & Diane F. Halpern (Eds.), Critical Thinking in Psychology (pp. 152–172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, Lynne (1999). Operationalising ‘metaphor’ for applied linguistic research. In: Lynne Cameron & Graham Low (Eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor (pp. 3–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Metaphor shifting in the dynamics of talk. In: Mara Sophia Zanotto, Lynne Cameron & Marilda C. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting Metaphor in Use. An Applied Linguistic Approach (pp. 45–62). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Mixed metaphors from a discourse dynamics perspective: A non-issue? In: Raymond W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing Metaphor (pp. 17–30). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, Lynne, Robert Maslen, Zazie Todd, John Maule, Peter Stratton & Neil Stanley (2009). The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(2), pp. 63–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr (2019). ‘Britain is full to the bursting point!’: Immigration themes in the Brexit discourse of the UK Independence Party. In: Veronika Koller, Susanne Kopf & Marlene Miglbauer (Eds.), Discourses of Brexit (pp. 69–85). London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Catalano, Theresa (2016). Talking About Global Migration. Implications for Language Teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan (2006). Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse & Society, 17(5), pp. 563–581. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). The discourse-historical approach. In: Jonathan Charteris-Black (Ed.), Analysing Political Speeches. Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor (pp. 123–152). Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul (1996). Security Metaphors. Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul & Mikhail Ilyin (1993). Metaphor in political discourse: the case of the ‘common European house’. Discourse & Society, 4(1), pp. 7–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul & Christina Schäffner (2002). Introduction. Themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse. In: Paul Chilton & Christina Schäffner (Eds.), Politics as Text and Talk. Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse (pp. 1–41). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Claridge, Claudia (2011). Hyperbole in English. A Corpus-based Study of Exaggeration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2017). Media coverage of the ‘refugee crisis’: A cross-European perspective. [[URL] accessed 23/09/2019].
Deignan, Alice (2017). From linguistic to conceptual metaphors. In: Elena Semino & Zsófia Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language (pp. 102–116). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dennison, James & Andrew Geddes (2019). A rising tide? The salience of immigration and the rise of anti-immigration political parties in Western Europe. The Political Quarterly, 90, (1), pp. 107–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diekman, Amanda B., Alice H. Eagly & Amanda M. Johnston (2010). Social structure. In: John F. Dovidio, Miles Hewstone, Peter Glick & Victoria M. Esses (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination (pp. 209–224). London: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dirven, René, Frank Polzenhagen & Hans-Georg Wolf (2007). Cognitive linguistics, ideology, and critical discourse analysis. In: Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1222–1240). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dirven, René, Roslyn Frank & Martin Pütz (2003). Introduction: Categories, cognitive models and ideologies. In: René Dirven, Roslyn Frank & Martin Pütz (Eds.), Cognitive Models in Language and Thought. Ideology, Metaphors and Meanings (pp. 1–22). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
El Refaie, Elisabeth (2001). Metaphors we discriminate by: Naturalized themes in Austrian newspaper articles about asylum seekers. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(3), pp. 352–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Esses, Victoria M., Stelian Medianu & Andrea S. Lawson (2013). Uncertainty, threat, and the role of the media in promoting the dehumanization of immigrants and refugees. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), pp. 518–536. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eubanks, Philip (2000). A War of Words in the Discourse of Trade. The Rhetorical Constitution of Metaphor. Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman & Ruth Wodak (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In: Teun A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Volume 2 (pp. 258–284). London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Reprint with revisions of the article published in Cognitive Science, 22(2), pp. 133–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Conceptual Blending, form and meaning. In: Pierre Fastrez (Ed.), Cognitive Semiotics, special issue of Recherches en Communication, 19, pp. 57–86. [[URL] accessed 23/09/2019]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gabrielatos, Costas & Paul Baker (2008). Fleeing, sneaking, flooding. A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK Press, 1996–2005. Journal of English Linguistics, 36(1), pp. 5–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garimella, Kiran, Aristides Gionis, Gianmarco de Francisci Morales & Michael Mathioudakis (2018). Political discourse on social media: Echo chambers, gatekeepers, and the price of bipartisanship. [[URL] accessed 11/10/2019]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gastil, John (2008). Political Communication and Deliberation. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. (2017). Metaphor, language, and dynamical systems. In: Elena Semino & Zsófia Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language (pp. 56–69). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grady, Joseph E., Oakley, Todd & Seana Coulson (1999). Blending and metaphor. In Raymond Gibbs, Jr. & Gerard J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardaker, Claire (2017). Flaming and trolling. In: Christian R. Hoffmann & Wolfram Bublitz (Eds.), Pragmatics of Social Media (pp. 493–522). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher (2011a). Force-interactive patterns in immigration discourse: A cognitive linguistic approach to CDA. Discourse & Society, 22(3), pp. 269–286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011b). Moving beyond metaphor in the Cognitive Linguistic Approach to CDA: Construal operations in immigration discourse. In: Christopher Hart (Ed.), Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition (pp. 171–192). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015a). Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015b). Discourse. In: Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 322–346). Berlin/Boston: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher (2018). Cognitive linguistic critical discourse studies. In: John Flowerdew & John E. Richardson (Eds.), Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 77–91). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Discourse. In: Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics. A Survey of Linguistic Subfields (pp. 81–107). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, Bruce (2001). Ideology, metaphor and iconographic reference. In: René Dirven, Roslyn Frank & Cornelia Ilie (Eds.), Language and Ideology. Volume 2: Descriptive Cognitive Approaches (pp. 27–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henkemans, A. Francisca Snoeck (2013). The use of hyperbole in the argumentation stage. OSSA Conference Archive, 159. [[URL] accessed 22/03/2020]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hermida, Alfred & Neil Thurman (2007). Comments please: How the British news media are struggling with user-generated content. Paper presented to the 8th International Symposium on Online Journalism, University of Texas, Austin, USA, March 31, 2007. [[URL] accessed 23/09/2019].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ICAR [Information Centre about Asylum Seekers and Refugees in the UK] (2005). Reporting Asylum. The UK Press and the Effectiveness of PCC Guidelines. London: ICAR.
(2012). Asylum Seekers, Refugees and Media. London: ICAR.
Kainz, L. (2016) People can’t flood, flow or stream: Diverting dominant media discourses on migration. [[URL] accessed 29/09/2019].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid (2009). The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers during the Balkan conflict (1999) and the British general election (2005). Discourse and Society, 20(4), pp. 477–498. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Immigration discourses and critical discourse analysis: Dynamics of world events and immigration representations in the British press. In: Christopher Hart & Piotr Cap (Eds.), Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies (pp. 501–519). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred (1992). Alltagslogik. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kimmel, Michael (2010). Why we mix metaphors (and mix them well): Discourse coherence, conceptual metaphor, and beyond. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, pp. 97–115.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity (2013). Implicit Bias Review. [[URL] accessed 10/10/2019].
Kövecses, Zoltán (2002). Metaphor. A practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Recent developments in metaphor theory: Are the new views rival ones? In: Francisco Gonzálvez-García, María Sandra Peña-Cervel & Lorena Pérez-Hernández (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy Revisited beyond the Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. Recent developments and applications (pp. 11–25). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Where Metaphors Come From. Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). A view of “mixed metaphor” within a conceptual metaphor theory framework. In: Raymond W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing Metaphor (pp. 3–16). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George (1996). Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Turner (1989). More than Cool Reason. A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lea, Martin, Tim O’Shea, Pat Fung & Russell Spears (1992). ‘Flaming’ in computer-mediated communication. In: Martin Lea (ed.), Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication (pp. 89–112). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Hangwoo (2005). Behavioral strategies for dealing with flaming in an online forum. Sociological Quarterly, 46, pp. 385–403. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O. (1933). The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the History of an Idea. (The William James Lectures.) Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manosevitch, Edith & Dana Walker (2009). Reader comments to online opinion journalism: A space of public deliberation. Paper prepared for presentation at the 10th International Symposium on Online Journalism, Austin, TX, April 17–18, 2009.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moore, Kerry (2013). ‘Asylum shopping’ in the neoliberal social imaginary. Media, Culture & Society, 35(3), pp. 348–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia (2008). Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Walking. A Dynamic View. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Why mixed metaphors make sense. In: Raymond W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing Metaphor (pp. 31–56). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mujagić, Mersina (2018). Dangerous waters metaphor in news discourse on refugee crisis. metaphorik.de, 28, pp. 99–131.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas (2004). Metaphor and Political Discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), pp. 23–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Political metaphor and bodies politic. In: Urszula Okulska & Piotr Cap (Eds.), Perspectives in Politics and Discourse (pp. 23–42). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012a). Immigrants and parasites: The history of a bio-social metaphor. In: Michi Messer, Renee Schroeder & Ruth Wodak (Eds.), Migrations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 249–258). Wien: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012b). The study of metaphor as part of critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 9(3), pp. 301–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3(1), pp. 41–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Metaphor scenario analysis as part of Cultural Linguistics. tekst i dyskurs – text und diskurs, 9, pp. 47–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. & Seth K. Goldman (2010). Mass media. In: John F. Dovidio, Miles Hewstone, Peter Glick & Victoria M. Esses (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination (pp. 241–257). London: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oxfam (2007). Forward Together. Ideas for working with asylum seekers, refugees, the media and communities. [[URL] accessed 26/09/2019].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parker, Samuel (2015). ‘Unwanted invaders’: The representation of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK and Australian print media. eSharp, Issue 23: Myth and Nation, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petersson, Bo & Lena Kainz (2017). Migration in the media. Metaphors in Swedish and German news coverage. NORDEUROPA forum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Philo, Greg, Emma Briant & Pauline Donald (2013). Bad News for Refugees. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pitts, Leonard Jr. (2010). The anonymous back-stabbing of Internet message boards. [[URL] accessed 26/09/2019].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pointon, Dylan (2018). Debating migration: The Brexit referendum in newspaper opinion pieces. Masters Thesis, Sheffield Hallam University. [[URL] accessed 24/09/2019].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Predelli, Stefano (2003). Scare quotes and their relation to other semantic issues. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26(1), pp. 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pullian, Alison (2018). The role of language in the media in influencing public perceptions of refugees. Senior Honors Thesis, Liberty University, Virginia, USA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reijnierse, W. Gudrun, Christian Burgers, Tina Krennmayr & Gerard J. Steen (2017). DMIP: A method for identifying potentially deliberate metaphor in language use. Corpus Pragmatics, 2(2), pp. 129–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin & Ruth Wodak (2001). Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, John E. (2007). Analysing Newspapers. An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Andrés (2017). Nasty discussion: an overview on flaming and incivility in news comment sections. Paper presented at the IAMCR conference in Cartagena, Colombia, July 2017.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenberry, Jack (2005). Few papers use online techniques to improve public communication. Newspaper Research Journal, 26(4), pp. 61–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowe, Ian (2015a). Civility 2.0: a comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), pp. 121–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015b). Deliberation 2.0: Comparing the deliberative quality of online news user comments across platforms. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 59(4), pp. 539–555. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz, Carlos, David Domingo, Josep Lluís Micó, Javier Díaz-Noci, Koldo Meso & Pere Masip (2011). Public Sphere 2.0? The democratic qualities of citizen debates in online newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), pp. 463–487. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryfe, David M. (2005). Does deliberative democracy work? Annual Review of Political Science, 8, pp. 49–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto (1999). ‘Like an animal I was treated’: Anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse. Discourse & Society, 10(2), pp. 191–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Brown Tide Rising. Metaphors of Latinos in contemporary American public discourse. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, Elena (2008). Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, Elena, Alice Deignan & Jeannette Littlemore (2012). Metaphor, genre and recontextualization. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(1), pp. 41–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sola, Alessandro (2018). The 2015 refugee crisis in Germany: concerns about immigration and populism (SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research at DIW Berlin). [[URL] accessed 23/09/2019]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard (1999). Metaphor and discourse: Towards a linguistic checklist for metaphor analysis. In: Lynne Cameron & Graham Low (Eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor (pp. 81–104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). From three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate metaphor. Metaphorik.de 21, pp. 83–110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Mixed metaphor is a question of deliberateness. In: Raymond W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing Metaphor (pp. 113–132). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Deliberate metaphor theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), pp. 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard J., Aletta G. Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna A. Kaal, Tina Krennmayr & Trijntje Pasma (2010). A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter (2001). Towards a Critical Cognitive Linguistics? In: Annette Combrink & Ina Bierman (Eds.), Poetics, Linguistics and History: Discourses of War and Conflict (pp. 510–528). Potchefstroom: University of Potchefstroom Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Charlotte (2021). Metaphors of migration over time. Discourse & Society, 32(4), pp. 463–481. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Threadgold, Terry (2009). The Media and Migration in the United Kingdom, 1999 to 2009. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
UNHCR (2015). Press Coverage of the Refugee and Migrant Crisis in the EU: A content analysis of five European countries. [[URL] accessed 23/09/2019]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1987). Communicating Racism. Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1993). Analyzing racism through discourse analysis. Some methodological reflections. In: John H. Stanfield II & Rutledge M. Dennis (Eds.), Race and Ethnicity in Research Methods (pp. 92–134). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000a). Ideologies, racism, discourse: Debates on immigration and ethnic issues. In: Jessika Ter Wal & Maykel Verkuyten (Eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Racism (pp. 91–115). Aldershot/Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000b). New(s) Racism: A discourse analytical approach. In: Simon Cottle (Ed.), Ethnic Minorities and the Media (pp. 33–49). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Political discourse and political cognition. In: Paul Chilton & Christina Schäffner (Eds.), Politics as Text and Talk. Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse (pp. 203–237). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Critical discourse analysis. In: Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Volume II (pp. 466–485). Malden: Wiley Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans H. & Peter Houtlosser (2002). Strategic maneuvering: maintaining a delicate balance. In: Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis (pp. 119–130). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vogelbacher, Stefanie (2019). Scenario Negotiation in Online Debates about the European Union. Analysing Metaphor in Communication. Berlin: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth (2001). What is CDA about: A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In: Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 1–13). London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zinken, Jörg, Iina Hellsten & Brigitte Nerlich (2008). Discourse metaphors. In: Roslyn M. Frank, René Dirven, Tom Ziemke & Enrique Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, Language and Mind. Vol. 2: Sociocultural Situatedness (pp. 363–385). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue