In:Cultural Linguistics and Critical Discourse Studies
Edited by Monika Reif and Frank Polzenhagen
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 103] 2023
► pp. 15–35
Culture-specific variation in interpretations of nations as bodies metaphors by English and German L1 speakers
Published online: 9 November 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.103.01mus
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.103.01mus
Abstract
One of the key-metaphor complexes in conceptualizing national
identity is that of the nation as a body or a person. Nation -embodiment and -personalization have had a long conceptual history and still figure
prominently in present-day political discourse. However, the
socio-psychological impact of these metaphors is still in question: does the
occurrence of embodied and personalized nation-depictions in public
discourse mean that recipients understand and interpret international
relations in terms of inter-body or inter-personal relationships?
New empirical evidence from a metaphor interpretation survey
conducted in 30 countries suggest that such conceptualizations do indeed
occur and lead to creative elaboration and inter-metaphor blendings.
Moreover, it can be shown that the elicited metaphor interpretations relate
to culture-specific discourse traditions. The chapter compares data from the
English and German L1 survey samples and discusses their implications for
the analysis of metaphor understanding.
Keywords: conceptual metaphor, culture, pragmatics, variation, universal vs. relative
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The ubiquity of metaphor variation
- 3.Variation in metaphor corpora
- 3.1The English L1 sample
- 3.2The German L1 sample
- 4.Comparison
- 5.Conclusions
Notes References
References (59)
Ahrens, Kathleen (2009). Politics,
Gender and Conceptual
Metaphors. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brugman, Britta C. & Christian Burgers (2018). Political
framing across disciplines: Evidence from 21st century
experiments. Research &
Politics 5(2), pp. 1–7.
Burgers, Christian, Elly A. Konijn & Gerard J. Steen (2016). Figurative
framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, and
irony. Communication
Theory 26, pp. 410–430.
Carston, Robyn & Catherine Wearing (2011). Metaphor,
hyperbole and simile: A pragmatic
approach. Language and
Cognition 3(2), pp. 283–312.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan (2004). Corpus
Approaches to Critical Metaphor
Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Chilton, Paul & George Lakoff (1995). Foreign
policy by
metaphor. In: Christina Schäffner & Anita Wenden (Eds.), Language
and
Peace (pp. 37–59). Aldershot: Dartmouth.
Deignan, Alice (2005). Metaphor
and Corpus
Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2010). The
evaluative properties of
metaphors. In: Graham Low, Zazie Todd, Alice Deignan & Lynne Cameron (Eds.), Researching
and Applying Metaphor in the Real
World (pp. 357–374). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner (2002). The
Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden
Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Flusberg, Stephen J., Teenie Matlock & Paul H. Thibodeau (2018). War
metaphors in public
discourse. Metaphor and
Symbol 33(1): 1–18.
Gibbs, Raymond W. (1994). The
Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and
Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, Raymond W. & Markus Tendahl (2011). Coupling
of metaphoric cognition and communication: A reply to Deirdre
Wilson. Intercultural
Pragmatics 8(4), pp. 601–609.
Harvey, A. D. (2007). Body
Politic. Political Metaphor and Political
Violence. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Heyvaert, Pauline (2019). Fairies,
Christmas miracles and sham marriages: a diachronic analysis of
deliberate metaphors in Belgian political
discourse. In: Julien Perrez, Min Reuchamps & Paul H. Thibodeau (Eds.), Variations
in Political
Metaphor (pp. 35–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Idström, Anna & Elisabeth Piirainen (Eds., in
cooperation with T. F.M. Falzett)
(2012). Endangered
Metaphors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2005). Metaphor
in Culture: Universality and
Variation. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
(2015). Where
Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in
Metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, George (1987) Women,
Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the
Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
(1993). The
contemporary theory of
metaphor. In: A. Ortony (ed.). Metaphor
and
Thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1996). Moral
Politics: What Conservatives Know That Liberals
Don’t. Chicago/ London: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson (1980/2003). Metaphors
We Live
by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(1999). Philosophy
in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western
Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, George & Mark Turner (1989). More
than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic
Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George & Elisabeth Wehling (2016). Your
Brain’s Politics. How the Science of Mind Explains the Political
Divide. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Littlemore, Jeannette (2001). The
effect of cultural background on metaphor
interpretation. Metaphor and
Symbol 18, pp. 273–88.
Littlemore, Jeannette & Graham Low (2006). Figurative
Thinking and Figurative Language
Learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
MacArthur, Fiona, José Luis Oncins-Martínez, Manuel Sánchez-García & Ana María Piquer-Píriz (Eds.) (2012). Metaphor
in Use: Context, culture, and
communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
MacArthur, Fiona, Tina Krennmayr & Jeannette Littlemore (2015). How
basic is “understanding is seeing” when
reasoning about knowledge? Asymmetric uses of sight metaphors in
office hours consultations in English as Academic Lingua
Franca. Metaphor and
Symbol 30(3), pp. 184–217.
Musolff, Andreas (2004). Metaphor
and Political Discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about
Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Musolff, Andreas, Fiona MacArthur & Giulio Pagani (Eds.) (2014). Metaphor
and Intercultural
Communication. London: Bloomsbury Linguistics.
Musolff, Andreas & Sing Tsun Derek Wong (2020). ‘England
is an appendix; Corrupt officials are like hairs on a nation’s
arm: Sarcasm, irony and self-irony in figurative
political
discourse. In:Angeliki Athanasiadou & Herbert L. Colston (Eds.), The
Diversity of
Irony (pp. 162–182). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Nederman, Cary J. (2004). Body
Politics: The diversification of organic metaphors in the later
Middle Ages. Pensiero politico
medievale 2, pp. 59–87.
Niemeier, Susanne and René Dirven (Eds.) (2000). Evidence
for Linguistic
Relativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Perrez, Julien, Min Reuchamps & Paul Thibodeau (Eds.) (2019). Variations
in Political
Metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2016). A
corpus-based study of ‘mixed metaphor’ as a metalinguistic
comment. In: Raymond W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing
Metaphor (pp. 203–222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Semino, Elena, Zsófia Demjén & Jane Demmen (2018). An
integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse,
and practice, with an application to metaphors for
cancer. Applied
Linguistics 39(5), pp. 625–645.
Sharifian, Farzad (2010). Cultural
conceptualizations in intercultural communication: A study of
Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal
Australians. Journal of
Pragmatics 42(12), pp. 3367–3376.
(2014). Conceptual
metaphor in intercultural communication between speakers of
Aboriginal English and Australian
English. In: Andreas Musolff, Fiona MacArthur & Giulio Pagani (Eds.), Metaphor
and Intercultural
Communication (pp. 117–129). London: Bloomsbury Linguistics.
Shorter Oxford
English
Dictionary (2002). Ed.
by William R. Trumble & Angus Stevenson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Steen, Gerard, Aletta G. Dorst, Berenike Herrmann, Anna Kaal, Tina Krennmayr & Trijntje Pasma (2010). A
Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to
MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tendahl, Markus (2009). A
Hybrid Theory of Metaphor: Relevance Theory and Cognitive
Linguistics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tendahl, Markus & Raymond W. Gibbs (2008). Complementary
perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistic and relevance
theory. Journal of
Pragmatics 40, pp. 1823–1864.
Thibodeau, Paul. H. & Lera Boroditsky (2011). Metaphors
we think with: The role of metaphor in
reasoning. PLoS
ONE 6(2): e16782.
Thibodeau, Paul H., James Fleming & Maya Lannen (2019). Variation
in methods for studying political metaphor: Comparing experiments
and discourse
analysis. In: Julien Perrez, Min Reuchamps & Paul Thibodeau (Eds.), Variations
in Political
Metaphor (pp. 177–194). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Townson, Michael (1992). Mother-Tongue
and Fatherland. Language and Politics in
German. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
