In:Remedies against the Pandemic: How politicians communicate crisis management
Edited by Nadine Thielemann and Daniel Weiss
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 102] 2023
► pp. 276–298
Exploiting the crisis
Populists, migration, minorities and Covid-19
Published online: 24 July 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.102.10bre
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.102.10bre
Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic posed many problems for politicians worldwide, but it also offered an opportunity for some politicians of a populist nature to exploit public fears and tensions by scapegoating migrants, minorities or other countries. In this chapter we follow Moffitt’s (2016) analysis of 21st century populism, in which he shows how crises are constructed discursively by populist leaders, who then stir up antagonism against certain out-groups whom they hold to be responsible for the crisis, and exploit the ensuing polarization in order to gain support. We examine four cases of political exploitation of fake news in which migrants were held responsible for spreading the Covid-19 virus or benefiting from treatment or vaccines before members of the in-group. These four cases are from very different cultural settings (Germany, Spain, Lebanon and India), and they all focus on multimodal evidence. Our analysis shows how each populist leader exploits existing cultural tensions and multimodal repertoires to persuade his/her audience. Although populist politicians draw on a wide range of different visual and textual manifestations embedded into different cultural settings, it is possible to identify certain common key strategies that characterize populist communication in times of crisis.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Politics, populism and migration
- 3.Multimodal analysis of social media
- 3.1Germany
- 3.2Spain
- 3.3Lebanon
- 3.4India
- 4.Discussion
References
References (34)
AfD (Alternative für Deutschland). 2021. [URL]
Ahmad, Irfan. 2019. “Populism: A Political Anthropology Approach.” Public Anthropologist 1 (2): 224–245.
Benet-Martínez, Verónica, and Shigehiro Oishi. 2008. “Culture and Personality.” In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (3rd ed.), ed. by Oliver P. John, Richard W. Robins, and Lawrence A. Pervin, 542–567. New York: Guilford Press.
Breeze, Ruth. 2019. “Positioning the People and its Enemies: Populism and Nationalism in AfD and UKIP.” Javnost – the Public 26 (1): 89–104.
. 2020. “Angry Tweets: A Corpus Assisted Study of Anger in Populist Political Discourse.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8 (1): 118–145.
De Cleen, Benjamin, and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2017. “Distinctions and Articulations: A Discourse-Theoretical Framework for the Study of Populism and Nationalism.” Javnost – The Public 24 (4): 301–425.
Desai, Shweta, and Amarnath Amarasingam. 2020. #Coronajihad. Covid-19, Misinformation and Anti-Muslim Violence in India. Strong Cities. [URL]
Durkheim, Émile. [1912] 1961. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, trans. by Joseph Swain. New York: Collier Books.
Gintsburg, Sarali, Ana María Fernández-Vallejo, and Karima Tayaa. 2020. Identidad y expectativas en la comunidad marroquí de Navarra: la perspectiva de las mujeres. Pamplona: Observatorio de la Realidad Social de Navarra.
Hofstede, Geert. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
. 2022. Country Comparisons. [URL]
Jain, Ritika. 2020. “Covid-19: How fake news and Modi Government messaging fuelled India’s latest spiral of Islamophobia.” Scroll.in. [URL]
Janmyr, Maja. 2021. “‘Sudanese Refugees’ and the ‘Syrian Refugee Response’ in Lebanon: Racialised Hierarchies, Processes of Invisibilisation, and Resistance.” Refugee Survey Quarterly 41(1): 131–156.
Khan, Aaqib. 2022. “Identity as Crime: How Indian Mainstream Media’s Coverage Demonized Muslims as Coronavirus Spreaders.” In Pandemic and Crisis Discourse: Communicating Covid-19 and Public Health Strategy, ed. by Andreas Musolff, Ruth Breeze, Kayo Kondo, and Sara Vilar-Lluch, 355–374. London: Bloomsbury.
Marcus, George E. 1997. “The Uses of Complicity in the Changing Mise-en-Scène of Anthropological Fieldwork.” Representations 59, 85–108.
Mercator Forum. 2021. MIDEM-Jahresstudie: Corona und Rechtspopulismus. Dresden: Technische Universität Dresden.
Moffitt, Benjamin. 2015. “How to Perform Crisis: A Model for Understanding the Key Role of Crisis in Contemporary Populism.” Government and Opposition 50 (2), 189–217.
. 2016. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style and Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Pasieka, Agnieszka. 2019. “Anthropology of the Far Right: What if we like the ‘Unlikable Others?” Anthropology Today 35 (1): 3–6.
OECD. 2021. International Migration Database. [URL]
Tohme Adaime, Zeina. 2021. “Populism, Identities and Social Movements in Lebanon: From a Sectarian Identity to a Popular One?” Hypothesis 3 (2): 4–27.
United Nations. 2018. World Population Prospects – Population Division. [URL]
Vox. 2021. [URL]
Weiss, Daniel. 2022. “How Autocrats Cope with the Corona Challenge: Belarus vs. Russia.” In Pandemic and Crisis Discourse: Communicating Covid-19 and Public Health Strategy, ed. by Andreas Musolff, Ruth Breeze, Kayo Kondo, and Sara Vilar-Lluch, 61–78. London: Bloomsbury.
World Bank. 2021. Lebanon: Overview. [URL].
Wynn, Lisa. 2021. “The Pandemic Imaginerie: Infectious Bodies and Military-Police Theater in Australia.” Cultural Anthropology 36 (3): 350–359.
Zienkowski, Jan, and Ruth Breeze (eds.). 2019. Imagining the Peoples of Europe. Populist Discourses across the Political Spectrum. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Li, Tao & Feng Pan
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
