In:Social Media and Society: Integrating the digital with the social in digital discourse
Edited by Majid KhosraviNik
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 100] 2023
► pp. 127–145
Language typology as a discursive affordance in digital discourse
The case of the “camouflaged German option” online
Published online: 14 April 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.100.07bor
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.100.07bor
Abstract
With the rapid development of participatory social media, these spaces have become new arenas for producing political discourse. However, critical analyses of digital discourse that examine the importance of language typological variation for the (re)production of political discourse are relatively new. This chapter investigates linguistic creativity in non-elite political communication by combining a critical discursive approach with language typology. The analysis highlights the importance of language typology in political communication as political actors exploit the typological affordances of Polish. This chapter demonstrates how language affordances are mobilised for political reasons to (re)produce discriminatory political messages. The chapter suggests combining critical discourse analysis and language typology to reveal novel perspectives on the intersection of language and politics on the Internet.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Digital media and critical discourse studies
- From critical discourse studies to language typology
- The sociopolitics of Silesian identity and the “camouflaged German option”
- Pro-Silesian and anti-Silesian discourses in online political discussions
- Case study: The “camouflaged German option” (CGO) discourse
- Conclusions
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (49)
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2014. “Languaging When Contexts Collapse: Audience Design in Social Networking.” Discourse, Context and Media 4–5: 62–73.
Baider, Fabienne, and Monika Kopytowska. 2017. “Conceptualising the Other: Online Discourses on the Current Refugee Crisis in Cyprus and in Poland.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 13 (2): 203–233.
Blommaert, Jan. 2019. “Formatting Online Actions: #justsaying on Twitter.” International Journal of Multilingualism 16 (2): 112–126.
Borowski, Krzysztof E.. 2020. Online Conflict Discourse, Identity, and the Social Imagination of Silesian Minority in Poland. PhD dissertation, University of Kansas. [URL]
Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Garcés Conejos Blitvich. 2012. “Social Interaction in YouTube Text-Based Polylogues: A Study of Coherence.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17 (4): 501–521.
Bruxelles, Sylvie, and Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni. 2004. “Coalitions in Polylogues.” Journal of Pragmatics 36 (1): 75–113.
Buchowski, Michał, and Katarzyna Chlewińska. 2012. “Tolerance of Cultural Diversity in Poland and Its Limitations.” San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. [URL]
Chadwick, Andrew. 2011. “The Political Information Cycle in a Hybrid News System: The British Prime Minister and the ‘Bullygate’ Affair.” International Journal of Press/Politics 16 (1): 3–29.
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Galasiński, Dariusz, and Katarzyna Skowronek. 2001. “Naming the Nation: A Critical Analysis of Names in Polish Political Discourse.” Political Communication 18 (1): 51–66.
Greenberg, Joseph. 1974. Language Typology: A Historical and Analytic Overview. The Hague, Paris: Mouton & Co.
Ikegami, Yoshihiko. 1990. “Typological Discourse Analysis.” Text. Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 10 (1–2): 49–52.
Johansson, Marjut, Sonja Kleinke, and Lotta Lehti. 2017. “The Digital Agora of Social Media: Introduction.” Discourse, Context and Media 19: 1–4.
Jones, Rodney H. 2005. “Sites of Engagement as Sites of Attention: Time, Space and Culture in Electronic Discourse.” In Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis, ed. by Sigrid Norris, and Rodney H. Jones, 141–154. Florence: Routledge.
2018. “Mediated Discourse Analysis in Language and Sexuality Research.” In Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, ed. by Kira Hall, and Rusty Barrett. New York: Oxford University Press.
KhosraviNik, Majid. 2014. “Critical Discourse Analysis, Power, and New Media (Digital) Discourse.” In Why Discourse Matters: Negotiating Identity in the Mediatized World, ed. by Yusuf Jr. Kalyango, and Monika Weronika Kopytowska, 283–301. New York: Peter Lang.
. 2018a. “Social Media Critical Discourse Studies (SM-CDS).” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 582–596. London: Routledge.
. 2018b. “Social Media Techno-Discursive Design, Affective Communication and Contemporary Politics.” Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 11 (4): 427–442.
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Eleonora Esposito. 2018. “Online Hate, Digital Discourse and Critique: Exploring Digitally-Mediated Discursive Practices of Gender-Based Hostility.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 14 (1): 45–68.
Kopytowska, Monika, Łukasz Grabowski, and Julita Woźniak. 2017. “Mobilizing against the Other: Cyberhate, Refugee Crisis and Proximization.” Contemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism across Space and Genres, ed. by Monika Kopytowska, 57–98. Łódź: John Benjamins.
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Per Ledin. 2017. “Uncivility on the Web.” Journal of Language and Politics 4: 566–581.
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Joshua A. Tucker. 2018. “Re/Constructing Politics through Social & Online Media: Discourse, Ideologies, and Mediated Political Practices.” Journal of Language and Politics 17 (2): 141–154.
Kuć, Joanna. 2007. “Nazwiska z sufiksem -ski/-cki w XVII-wiecznych księgach kościelnych parafii mokobodzkiej [Last Names with the -ski/-cki Suffix in the 17th-c. Mokobody Parish Church Records].” Conversatoria Linguistica 1: 133–139.
Lieber, Rochelle. 2017. “Derivational Morphology.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Marwick, Alice E., and danah boyd. 2011. “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media & Society 13 (1): 114–133.
Myers-Scotton, Carol. 1997. Duelling Languages: Grammatical Structure in Codeswitching. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Myhill, John. 2003. “Typology and Discourse Analysis.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton, 161–174. Oxford: Blackwell.
Otheguy, Ricardo, Ofelia García, and Wallis Reid. 2015. “Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics.” Applied Linguistics Review 6 (3): 281–307.
Page, Ruth. 2018. Narratives Online: Shared Stories in Social Media. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Poplack, Shana. 2008. “Code-Switching.” In Sociolinguistics: An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society. Vol. 1, ed. by Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus J. Mattheier, and Peter Trudgill, 589–596. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Prawo i Sprawiedliwość. 2011. “Raport o stanie Rzeczypospolitej [Report on the State of the Republic of Poland].” Warsaw. Retrieved from: [URL] (last accessed on 30 June 2019).
Pustułka, Agata. 2011. “Abp Skworc: Owszem, żyjemy Na Śląsku, ale jesteśmy Polakami [Archbishop Skworc: Indeed, We Live in Silesia But We’re Poles].” Dziennik Zachodni [Western Daily], 25 December 2011. Retrieved from: [URL] (last accessed on 30 June 2019).
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2016. “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 23–61. London: Sage.
Ritzer, George, and Nathan Jurgenson. 2010. “Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The Nature of Capitalism in the Age of the Digital ‘Prosumer.’” Journal of Consumer Culture 10 (1): 13–36.
Rothstein, Robert A. 1993. “Polish.” In The Slavonic Languages, ed. by Bernard Comrie and Greville Corbett, 686–758. London, New York: Routledge.
Sieradzki, Andrzej. 2016. “Słowotwórstwo nazwisk mieszkańców wsi we wrzesińskich księgach chrztu z XVIII wieku [Word Formation of Countryside Residents’ Last Names in the 18th-c. Baptismal Records from Września].” Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne 23 (1): 67–80.
SJP. 2019. “Folksdojcz – Słownik Języka Polskiego PWN.” Słownik Języka Polskiego PWN. Accessed 1 February 2019. Retrieved from: [URL] (last accessed on 30 June 2019).
Tagg, Caroline, Philip Seargeant, and Amy Aisha Brown. 2017. Taking Offence on Social Media: Conviviality and Communication on Facebook. Cham: Springer.
Tannen, Deborah, and Christina Kakava. 1992. “Modern Greek Conversation: Disagreeing to Agree.” Journal of Modern Greek Studies 10 (1): 11–34.
Thielemann, Nadine. 2016. “Patriotyzm genetyczny, półka kulturowa and Palikotyzacja X-a – Blends as Catchwords in Polish Political Discourse.” Zeitschrift für Slawistik 61 (1): 74–101.
Thurlow, Crispin. 2006. “From Statistical Panic to Moral Panic: The Metadiscursive Construction and Popular Exaggeration of New Media Language in the Print Media.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 (3): 667–701.
Vaccari, Cristian. 2013. Digital Politics in Western Democracies: A Comparative Study. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Wei, Li. 2018. “Translanguaging as a Practical Theory of Language.” Applied Linguistics 39 (1): 9–30.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1976. “Particles and Linguistic Relativity.” International Review of Slavic Linguistics 1 (2–3): 327–367.
. 1985. “Different Cultures, Different Languages, Different Speech Acts. Polish vs. English.” Journal of Pragmatics 9 (2–3): 145–178.
