Cover not available

In:Social Media and Society: Integrating the digital with the social in digital discourse
Edited by Majid KhosraviNik
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 100] 2023
► pp. 1–14

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Connecting the digital with the social in digital discourse

An introduction to the scene

 | University of Newcastle
Published online: 14 April 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.100.01kho
Article outline
  • Outline of the volume
  • References
References (36)
References
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2008. “Potentials and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography”. Language@Internet vol., 5 (9).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Online data collection.” In Data collection in sociolinguistics: Methods and applications, ed. by C. Malinson, B. Childs, & V. Herk, 236–250. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atkins, Judi, Finlayson, Alan, Martin, James and Turnbull, Nick. (eds.). 2014. Rhetoric in British Politics and Society. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barton, David, and Lee, Carmen. 2013. Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bouvier, Gwen. 2022. “From ‘echo chambers’ to ‘chaos chambers’: discursive coherence and contradiction in the #MeToo Twitter feed.” Critical Discourse Studies 19 (2): 179–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bouvier, Gwen, and Machin, David. 2021. “What gets lost in Twitter ‘cancel culture’ hashtags? Calling out racists reveals some limitations of social justice campaigns.” Discourse & Society 32 (3): 307–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brock, André. 2018. “Critical technocultural discourse analysis.” New Media & Society 20 (3): 1012–1030. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dillet, Benoît. 2022. “Speaking to algorithms? Rhetorical political analysis as technological analysis.” Politics 42 (2): 231–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: PolityGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Wodak, Ruth. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” in Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. By T. van Dijk, 258–284. London: SAGE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, Susan. C. 2004. “Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior.” In Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning, ed. by S. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Gray, 338–376. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. “Web Content Analysis: Expanding the Paradigm”. In International Handbook of Internet Research, ed. by J. Hunsinger, L. Klastrup, and M. Allen, 233–250. Springer: London and New York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. “Research: Computer-mediated communication”. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 40 (3): 41–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hine, Christine. 2015. Ethnography for the Internet Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inwood, Olivia, and Zappavigna, Michele. 2021. “Ambient affiliation, misinformation and moral panic: Negotiating social bonds in a YouTube internet hoax.” Discourse & Communication 15 (3). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Rodney. 2004. “The problem of context in computer-mediated communication.” In Discourse and technology: multimodal discourse analysis, ed. by Levine, T., and Scollon, R., 22–33. Georgetown University Press: Washington.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Rodney H., Chik, Alice, and Hafner, Christoph. A. (eds.) 2015. Discourse and digital practices: Doing discourse analysis in the Digital Age. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid. 2014. “Critical discourse analysis, power, and new media discourse.” In Why discourse matters: Negotiating identity in the mediatized world, ed. by M. Kopytowska & Y. Kalyango, 287–305. Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS).” In Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by J. Flowerdew & J. E. Richardson, 582–596. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Social media techno-discursive design, affective communication and contemporary politics.” Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 11 (4): 427–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Populist digital media? Social media systems and the global populist right discourse.” Public Seminar. [URL]
. 2022. “Digital meaning-making across content and practice in social media critical discourse studies.” Critical Discourse Studies 19 (2): 119–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Esposito, Eleonora. 2018. “Online hate, digital discourse and critique: Exploring digitally mediated discursive practices of gender-based hostility.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics: Special Issue on Narrating Hostility, Challenging Hostile Narratives 14 (1): 45–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Unger, Johan. W. 2016. “Critical discourse studies and social media: Power, resistance and critique in changing media ecologies.” In Methods of critical discourse studies. 3rd ed., ed. by R. Wodak, & M. Meyer, 205–233. SAGE. [URL]
Norris, Sigrid, and Jones, Rodney. H. 2005. Discourse in action: introducing mediated discourse analysis. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Page, Ruth. 2012. Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interaction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Page, Ruth, Barton, David, Unger, Johan. W., and Zappavigna, Michelle. 2014. Researching language in social media. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2015. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron. 2001. Mediated Discourse: The nexus of practice. London, Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron, and Scollon, Suzie Wong. 2004. Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagg, Caroline. 2015. Exploring Digital Communication Language in Action. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weiss, Gilbert, and Wodak, Ruth. 2003. “Introduction: Theory, Interdisciplinarity and Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity, ed. by G. Weiss, & R. Wodak, 1–34. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2011. “Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter.” New Media & Society 13 (5): 788–806. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. “Social media quotation practices and ambient affiliation: Weaponising ironic quotation for humorous ridicule in political discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 191: 98–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele, and Dreyfus, Shoshana. 2022. “‘In these pandemic times’: The role of temporal meanings in ambient affiliation about COVID-19 on Twitter.” Discourse, Context & Media 47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue