In:Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse
Edited by Paul Bayley
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 10] 2004
► pp. v–vi
Get fulltext
This article is available free of charge.
Published online: 26 February 2004
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.10.toc
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.10.toc
Table of contents
Introduction: The whys and wherefores of analysing parliamentary discourse
Insulting as (un)parliamentary practice in the British and Swedish parliaments: A rhetorical approach
Negotiating conflict: Interruptions in British and Italian parliamentary debates
Consent and dissent in British and Italian parliamentary debates on the 1998 Gulf Crisis
Legitimising and informative discourse in the Kosovo debates in the British House of Commons and the Italian Chamber of Deputies
Threat and fear in parliamentary debates in Britain, Germany and Italy
Ways of talking about work in parliamentary discourse in Britain and Spain
'Truth, Justice and the American way': The APPRAISAL SYSTEM of JUDGEMENT in the U.S. House debate on the impeachment of the President, 1998
Parliamentary discourse when things go wrong: Mapping histories, contexts, conflicts
Text and Context of parliamentary debates
