Aspects of Leibniz’s method for religious controversy: 12. The golden rule

Lærke, Mogens

doi:10.1075/cvs.7.15lar

In:The Practice of Reason: Leibniz and his Controversies
Edited by Marcelo Dascal †
[Controversies 7] 2010
► pp. 297–319

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

12. The golden rule

Aspects of Leibniz’s method for religious controversy

Mogens Lærke

Published online: 4 March 2010

https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.7.15lar

Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Fritz, Gerd

2018. Chapter 3. The pragmatic organization of the Hobbes vs. Bramhall controversy (1645–1658). In Historical Pragmatics of Controversies [Controversies, 14], ► pp. 96 ff.

Laerke, Mogens

2008. Apology for a Credo Maximum: On Three Basic Rules in Leibniz’s Method of Religious Controversy. In Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist?, ► pp. 397 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.