Pragmatic inconsistency and credibility

van Laar, Jan Albert

doi:10.1075/cvs.6.11laa

In:Controversy and Confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Controversies 6] 2008
► pp. 163–179

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Pragmatic inconsistency and credibility

Jan Albert van Laar

Published online: 17 December 2008

https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.6.11laa

Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2018. Distinguishing Between Different Kinds of Argumentative Practices. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33], ► pp. 129 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans

2013. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans

2014. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 517 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.