On the role of pragmatics, rhetoric and dialectic in scientific controversies

Ferreira, Ademar

doi:10.1075/cvs.6.08fer

In:Controversy and Confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Controversies 6] 2008
► pp. 125–133

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

On the role of pragmatics, rhetoric and dialectic in scientific controversies

Ademar Ferreira

Published online: 17 December 2008

https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.6.08fer

Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Order by:

Jakaza, Ernest & Marianna Visser

2016. ‘Subjectivity’ in newspaper reports on ‘controversial’ and ‘emotional’ debates: An appraisal and controversy analysis. Language Matters 47:1 ► pp. 3 ff.

de Donato Rodríguez, Xavier & Jesús Zamora Bonilla

2014. Scientific Controversies and the Ethics of Arguing and Belief in the Face of Rational Disagreement. Argumentation 28:1 ► pp. 39 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans

2013. Research in Related Disciplines and Non-Anglophone Areas. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans

2014. Research in Related Disciplines and Non-Anglophone Areas. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 677 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.