Dichotomies and types of debate

Dascal, Marcelo

doi:10.1075/cvs.6.03das

In:Controversy and Confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Controversies 6] 2008
► pp. 27–49

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Dichotomies and types of debate

Marcelo Dascal

Published online: 17 December 2008

https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.6.03das

Cited by (38)

Cited by 38 other publications

Order by:

Bates, Carolina Figueras

2024. The Effect of Empathic Mediation in Conflict Resolution. In Accessing the Public Sphere, ► pp. 113 ff.

FUCHS‐GALLEZOT, Magali & Corinne FORTIN

2024. The Current “Synthesis versus Extended Theory of Evolution” Controversy. In The Evolution of Life: Teaching, Learning and Training, ► pp. 117 ff.

Foderaro, Antonella & David Gunnarsson Lorentzen

2023. Argumentative practices and patterns in debating climate change on Twitter. Aslib Journal of Information Management 75:1 ► pp. 131 ff.

Almeida Rodrigues Lima, Cecília

2021. Telenovela e controvérsias. Tríade: Comunicação, Cultura e Mídia 9:21 ► pp. 168 ff.

Greco, Sara & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria

2021. Mediators’ reframing as a constitutive element of a reconciliatory argumentative style. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 73 ff.

Ilie, Cornelia

2021. Discussion, dispute or controversy?. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:2 ► pp. 237 ff.

Abrantes, Paulo C.

2020. Human evolution. In Controversies and interdisciplinarity [Controversies, 16], ► pp. 133 ff.

Greco, Roberto

2020. The role and the impact of interdisciplinarity on the relational models of intervention in the doctor-patient communication. In Controversies and interdisciplinarity [Controversies, 16], ► pp. 217 ff.

Lorentzen, David Gunnarsson

2020. Bridging polarised Twitter discussions: the interactions of the users in the middle. Aslib Journal of Information Management 73:2 ► pp. 129 ff.

Malloy, Jacquelynn A., Kelly N. Tracy, Roya Q. Scales, Kristin Menickelli & W. David Scales

2020. It’s Not About Being Right: Developing Argument Through Debate. Journal of Literacy Research 52:1 ► pp. 79 ff.

Renaut, Laurène & Laura Ascone

2019. Contre-discours au discours de haine djihadiste : de l’expression de la conflictualité à la fabrique du doute. Semen 47

Shoham, Kuti

2019. Locke’s and Leibniz’s virtual debate over Of our knowledge of the existence of God . In Controversies in the Contemporary World [Controversies, 15], ► pp. 29 ff.

Van Herzele, Ann & Noelle Aarts

2019. Arguing Along Fault-lines: A Rhetorical Analysis of Public Divides over Wildlife Comeback. Conservation and Society 17:4 ► pp. 343 ff.

David, Joseph E.

2017. DIVINITY, LAW, AND THE LEGAL TURN IN THE STUDY OF RELIGIONS. Journal of Law and Religion 32:1 ► pp. 172 ff.

Chateauraynaud, Francis

2016. Pragmatique des transformations et sociologie des controverses. In Histoires pragmatiques, ► pp. 349 ff.

Jakaza, Ernest & Marianna Visser

2016. ‘Subjectivity’ in newspaper reports on ‘controversial’ and ‘emotional’ debates: An appraisal and controversy analysis. Language Matters 47:1 ► pp. 3 ff.

Rennes, Juliette

2016. Les controverses politiques et leurs frontières. Études de communication :47 ► pp. 21 ff.

Sariel, Aviram

2016. Marcelo Dascal’s Theory of Controversies. Pragmatics & Cognition 23:3 ► pp. 437 ff.

Scarafile, Giovanni

2016. Perpetual beginners. Pragmatics & Cognition 23:3 ► pp. 359 ff.

Uzelgun, Mehmet ali, Marcin Lewiński & Paula Castro

2016. Favorite Battlegrounds of Climate Action. Science Communication 38:6 ► pp. 699 ff.

Alexis, Lucie & Jérôme Ravat

2015. Désactiver la violence verbale : pacification et disqualification au moyen de la politesse dans Ce soir (ou jamais !). Semen 40

Lewiński, Marcin

2015. Debating multiple positions in multi-party online deliberation. In Argumentation in Political Deliberation [Benjamins Current Topics, 76], ► pp. 151 ff.

Lewiński, Marcin

2016. Shale gas debate in Europe: Pro-and-con dialectics and argumentative polylogues. Discourse & Communication 10:6 ► pp. 553 ff.

Oger, Claire

2015. « La polémique est un mode de gestion socio-discursif du conflit dans les sociétés démocratiques ». Mots :108 ► pp. 155 ff.

Van Herzele, Ann, Noelle Aarts & Jim Casaer

2015. Wildlife comeback in Flanders: tracing the fault lines and dynamics of public debate. European Journal of Wildlife Research 61:4 ► pp. 539 ff.

Lewiński, Marcin & Mark Aakhus

2014. Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry. Argumentation 28:2 ► pp. 161 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans

2013. Research in Related Disciplines and Non-Anglophone Areas. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans

2014. Research in Related Disciplines and Non-Anglophone Areas. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 677 ff.

van Laar, Jan Albert & Erik C. W. Krabbe

2013. The Burden of Criticism: Consequences of Taking a Critical Stance. Argumentation 27:2 ► pp. 201 ff.

van Laar, Jan Albert & Erik C.W. Krabbe

2016. Fair and unfair strategies in public controversies. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:3 ► pp. 315 ff.

Dascal, Marcelo

2012. Is There a Controversy Concerning the Morality of the Occupation and Its Implications?1. In The Impacts of Lasting Occupation, ► pp. 61 ff.

Dascal, Marcelo

2014. Dialogue of Rationalities: A Case Study. In Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 3], ► pp. 219 ff.

Spranzi, Marta

2012. The Nature and Purpose of Aristotelian Dialectic Revisited: Argumentation Theory, Scientific Controversies and Epistemology. In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 22], ► pp. 163 ff.

Amossy, Ruth

2011. La coexistence dans le dissensus. Semen 31 ► pp. 25 ff.

Amossy, Ruth

2015. Quelle vocation empirique pour l’argumentation dans le discours ?. Argumentation et analyse du discours 15

Amossy, Ruth

2021. Public Controversy and Polemics: Some Attempts at Definitions. In In Defense of Polemics [Argumentation Library, 42], ► pp. 27 ff.

Amossy, Ruth

2021. Managing Disagreement in Democracies: Towards a Rhetoric of Dissensus. In In Defense of Polemics [Argumentation Library, 42], ► pp. 9 ff.

Amossy, Ruth & Marcel Burger

2011. Introduction : la polémique médiatisée. Semen 31 ► pp. 7 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.