In:Argumentation in Practice
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser
[Controversies 2] 2005
► pp. v–vii
Get fulltext
This article is available free of charge.
Published online: 22 September 2005
https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.2.toc
https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.2.toc
Table of contents
Introduction
Part I. Forms and conceptions of argumentation
1. “The issue” in argumentative practice and theory
2. Hearing is believing: A perspective-dependent account of the fallacies
3. Let’s talk: Emotion and the pragma-dialectic model
4. Indicators of dissociation
5. A collaborative model of argumentation in dyadic problem-solving interactions
6. The argumentative dimension of discourse
7. Designing premises
8. On the pragmatics of argumentative discourse
9. From argument analysis to cultural keywords (and back again)
Part II. Empirical studies of argumentative practice
10. The accusation of amalgame as a meta-argumentative refutation
11. Constructing the (imagined) antagonist in advertising argumentation
12. Competing demands, multiple ideals, and the structure of argumentation practices: A pragma-dialectical analysis of televised town hall meetings following the murder trial of O.J. Simpson
13. Arguments of victims: A case study of the Timothy McVeigh trial
14. Coductive and abductive foundations for sentimental arguments in politics
15. Reparations or separation? The rhetoric of racism in black and white
16. Discursive collisions: A reading of “Ellen’s energy adventure”
17. Aesthetic arguments and civil society
18. The use of arguments from perceived opposition in U.S. terrorism policy
19. How could official speakers communicate reasonably with their king?
20. Argument density and argument diversity in the license applications of French provincial printers, 1669–1781
21. Inventional capacity
22. The conventional validity of the pragma-dialectal freedom rule
Index
