In:Controversies and Interdisciplinarity: Beyond disciplinary fragmentation for a new knowledge model
Edited by Jens Allwood, Olga Pombo, Clara Renna and Giovanni Scarafile
[Controversies 16] 2020
► pp. 199–215
Chapter 10Controversial images
‘Listening to’ the visual, for a new communication ethics
Published online: 15 October 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.16.10ner
https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.16.10ner
Abstract
Communicating with controversial images may be a device to draw attention to issues that are key to the interest of people and society alike. A device that can raise public awareness, or, instead, anaesthetise it may lead to make responsible or irresponsible choices. It is this ability of images that will be emphasised by communicative events involving controversial images, astride three media revolutions ad imaginem: printing, photography and digital technology. Lastly, emphasis will be placed on the importance of communication ethics in the choice of a “good” controversial image, one that may enable viewers to see it, ‘listen to it’ and understand it and, thus, to act morally.
Keywords: controversial, ethics, image, listening, social, visual communication
Article outline
- Foreword: The power and limits of controversial images
- The inter-disciplinary and synesthetic dimensions of visual communication
- The contro-versial dimension of the visual, and opinion-forming
- Medial caesurae and controversies from, and in, the visual
- Conclusions: Listening to images, for a controversial ethics of the visual
Notes References
References (57)
Alberti, L. B. (1973). De Pictura. In Id., Opere volgari (vol. III., pp. 5–108). Bari: Laterza. (Original work published 1435).
Anders, G. (2007). Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen. Über die Seele im Zeitalter der zweiten industriellen Revolution. München: C. H. Beck (Original work published 1956).
Asselt, P., Geest, D. & Muller T. Salemink (Eds.). (2007). Iconoclasm and Iconoclash. Struggle for Religious Identity. Leiden-Boston: Brill.
Baudrillard, J. (1996). Il delitto perfetto. La televisione ha ucciso la realtà?. Milano: Raffello Cortina Editore.
Belting, H. (2005). Image, Medium, Body: A New Approach of Iconology (pp. 302–319). Critical Inquiry, 31, 2.
Benjamin, W. (1955). Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. (Original edition 1936).
Bianchi, I. (2008). La politica delle immagini nell’età della controriforma. Bologna: Editrice Compositori.
Boehm, G. (1994). Die Wiederkehr der Bilder. In G. Boehm (Ed.). Was ist ein Bild? (pp. 11–38). München: Fink.
Checchi, G. (2018). L’iconoclastia nelle stampe tedesche del primo Cinquecento. Intrecci d’Arte. 7, 50–71.
Didi-Huberman, G. (2005). Immagini malgrado tutto. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore. (Original work published 2003).
Ehrlich, R. T. (Ed.). (2000). Excerpts from Civic Responsibility and Higher Education. Phenix: Oryx Press.
Fabris, A. (2018). Ethics of Information and Communication Technologies. New York-Berlin: Springer International Publishing.
Floridi, F. (2014). The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Flusser, V. (2009). Immagini. Come la tecnologia ha cambiato la nostra percezione del mondo. Roma: Fazi editore. (Original work published 1983).
Franzini, E. (2010). Introduzione. In R. Debray. Vita e morte dell’immagine (pp. 13–15). Milano: Il Castoro.
Fromm, E. (1991). Von der Kunst des Zuhörens. Therapeutische Aspekte der Psychoanalyse. Weinheim: Beltz.
Habermas, J. (2001). Storia e critica dell’opinione pubblica. Roma-Bari: Editori Laterza. (Original work published 1962).
Kant, I. (2012). Critique of Judgment. New York: Dover Publications Inc. (Original work published 1790).
Kracauer, S. (1982). La fotografia. In Id. La massa come ornamento (pp. 111–127). Napoli: Prismi. (Original work published 1927).
Latour, B. (2002). What is iconoclash? Or is There a World Beyond the Image Wars?. In B. Latour & P. Weibel. Iconoclash: Beyond the Image Wars in Science, Religion, and Art (pp. 16–40). Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
Marin, L. (2009). L’essere dell’immagine e la sua efficacia. In A. Pinotti & A. Somaini (Eds.). Teorie dell’immagine (pp. 271–286). Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
Mirzoeff, N. (2004). Watching Babylon: The War in Iraq and Global Visual Culture. Routledge: New York.
(2005). The Unspeakable and the Unimaginable: Word and Image in a Time of Terror. ELH, 72, 2, 291–308.
Mondzain, M. J. (2011). Il commercio degli sguardi. Milano: Edizioni Medusa. (Original work published 2003).
Nancy, J.-L. (2005a). L’immagine: mimesis e methexis. In C.-C. Härle (Ed.). Ai limiti dell’immagine. Macerata: Quodlibet.
(2005b). Image and Violence. In Id., The Ground of the Image (pp. 15–26). New York: Fordham University Press.
Paleotti, G. (1582). Discorso intorno le imagini sacre et profane diviso in cinque libri. Bologna: Alessandro Benacci.
Perna, R. & Schiaffini, I. (2015). Etica e fotografia: una relazione attuale. In R. Perna & I. Schiaffini (Eds.). Etica e fotografia. Potere, ideologia, violenza dell’immagine fotografica (pp. 5–13). Roma: DeriveApprodi.
Perna, R. and Schiaffini, I. (Eds.). (2015). Etica e fotografia. Potere, ideologia, violenza dell’immagine fotografica. Roma: DeriveApprodi.
Pinotti, A. & Somaini, A. (Eds.). (2009). Teorie dell’immagine. Il dibattito contemporaneo. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
Scavizzi, G. (1981). L’architettura sacra: arte e architettura sacra: cronache e documenti sulla controversia tra riformati e cattolici: 1500–1550. Reggio Calabria – Roma: Casa del Libro.
Sontag, S. (2004). Sulla fotografia. Realtà e immagine nella nostra società. Torino: Einaudi. (Original work published 1977).
Vis, F. & Goriunova, O. (Eds.). (2015). The iconic image on social media: a rapid research response to the death of Aylan Kurdi. Sheffield: Visual Social Media Lab.
