In:Controversies and Interdisciplinarity: Beyond disciplinary fragmentation for a new knowledge model
Edited by Jens Allwood, Olga Pombo, Clara Renna and Giovanni Scarafile
[Controversies 16] 2020
► pp. 115–131
Chapter 6What is the meaning of biodiversity?
A pragmatist approach to an intrinsically interdisciplinary concept
Published online: 15 October 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.16.06ban
https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.16.06ban
Abstract
The preservation of biodiversity is one of the greatest concerns of our age. However, a satisfactory operational definition of biodiversity is still lacking, and it is likely that it won’t be achieved in the near future. In their practice of measurement scientists adopt a pluralistic and multi-dimensional metric – an approach which is widely accepted, but not theoretically justified. The goal of this paper is to account for such pluralistic approach. Our solution is pragmatist: we hold that the pragmatic maxim highlights the fact-value entanglement intrinsic to the concept of biodiversity. On this basis, we argue that the axiological dimension is essential to the meaning of the concept since its extension cannot be fixed independently of it.
Keywords: biodiversity, fact-value entanglement, measurement, pluralism, pragmatic maxim, pragmatism
Article outline
- 1.The traditional approach to biodiversity
- 2.Pragmatist epistemology and the rejection of the copy theory of knowledge
- 3.How to make biodiversity clear: Pragmatic maxim and the meaning of scientific concepts
- 4.Conclusion
Notes References
References (20)
Bailey, J. K. (2011). From genes to ecosystems: a genetic basis to ecosystem services. Population Ecology, Vol. 53, 11, 47–52.
Dirzo, R. and Mendoza, E. (2008). Biodiversity. In S. E. Jorgensen and B. Faith (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Ecology (368–377). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Gaston, K. J. (1996). What is Biodiversity? In K. J. Gaston (Ed.), Biodiversity. A Biology of Numbers and Difference (pp. 1–9). Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.
Gaston, K. J. and Spicer, J. I. (2004). Biodiversity. An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.
Hamilton, A. J. (2005). Species Diversity or Biodiversity? Journal of Environmental Management, 75, 89–92.
Hangeveld, R. (1996). Measuring Ecological Biodiversity. Biodiversity Letters, Vol. 3, No. 2, 58–65.
Kocher, T. D., Albertson, R. C., Carleton, K. L., Streelman, J. T. (2003). The Genetic Basis of Biodiversity: Genomic Studies of Cichlid Fishes. In N. Shimizu, T. Aoki, I. Hirono, F. Takashima (Eds.), Acquatic Genomics. Steps Toward a Great Future (pp. 35–44). Tokyo: Springer Japan.
Magurran, A. E. and McGill, B. J. (2011). Challenges and Opportunities in the Measurement and Assessment of Biological Diversity. In A. E. Magurran and B. J. McGill (Eds.), Biological Diversity. Frontiers in Measurement and Assessment (pp. 1–7). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marchetti, G. and Marchetti, S. (Eds.) (2016). Facts and Values: The Ethics and Metaphysics of Normativity. London: Routledge.
Misak, C. (1991). Truth and the End of Inquiry. A Peircean Account of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1878/1986). How to Make Our Ideas Clear. In C. J. W. Kloesel (Ed.), Writings of Charles Sanders Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 3 (pp. 257–276). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
(1905/1960). Issues of Pragmaticism. In C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. V (pp. 293–313). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sarkhar, S. (2005). Biodiversity and Environmental Philosophy. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sarkhar, S. and Margules, C. (2002). Operationalizing Biodiversity for Conservation Planning. Journal of Biosciences, Vol. 27, 4, 299–308.