In:Controversies in the Contemporary World
Edited by Adriano Fabris and Giovanni Scarafile
[Controversies 15] 2019
► pp. 261–278
Chapter 14How to solve controversies in scenarios of legal pluralism
Published online: 7 August 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.15.15mar
https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.15.15mar
Abstract
In this paper I propose a method to solve controversies in scenarios of legal pluralism. Shortly, in scenarios of legal pluralism some of the controversies involve members of culturally differentiated groups who justify their allegations with arguments that only make sense in the culture to which they belong. If the adjudicator does not share the same cultural worldview as the parts under litigation, how can he/she come to make a decision determining the parties’ rights and obligations? My answer for this question includes (1) an account of knowledge to culturally differentiated groups, and (2) a method for the evaluation of the culturally-dependent arguments.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The problem
- 3.The methodology
- 4.Three alternative answers
- 4.1Foundationalism
- 4.2Coherentism
- 4.3Reliabilism
- 5.A possible objection
- 5.1Summativism and group justification
- 6.Conclusion
References
References (16)
Colombian Constitutional Court. (1997). T-523 (M.P. Carlos Gaviria Diaz).
Cryer, R. (2007). A Long Way From Home: Witnesses Before International Criminal Tribunals. International Commentary on Evidence, 4(1), 1–4.
Gilbert, M. (1994). Living Together: Rationality, Sociality, and Obligation. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Goldman, A. (1976). What is a Justified Belief? In G. Pappas (Ed.), Justification and Knowledge (pp. 1–23). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
(2005). Legal Evidence. In M. Golding & W. Edmunson (Eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (pp. 163–175). Maden: Blackwell.
Halki, R. (2011). On Dialectical justification of groups beliefs. In H. Schmider, D. Sirtesed & M. Webergold (Eds.), Collective epistemology (pp. 119–153). Ontos Verlag: Frankfurt.
Kelsall, T. (2009). Culture Under Cross-examination: International Justice and the Special Court Sierra Leone. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Knanvig, J. (2003). The Value of Knowledge and the Pursue of Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2012). Coherentism and Justified Inconsistent Beliefs: A Solution. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 50(1), 21–41.
Lyons, J. (2012). Should Reliabilists Be Worried about Demon Worlds? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 86(1), 1–40.
