In:Controversies in the Contemporary World
Edited by Adriano Fabris and Giovanni Scarafile
[Controversies 15] 2019
► pp. 127–143
Chapter 7Dialogue in philosophical practices
Published online: 7 August 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.15.08ber
https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.15.08ber
Abstract
The definition of the lowest common denominator of philosophical practices is widely debated: what is the
philosophical core that allows us to distinguish them from other activities? Also, is it possible to identify a
methodical peculiarity in philosophical practices? Indeed, many philosophical practitioners refer to dialogue as the
specific philosophical character marking their professional activity. This statement, which as such is rather naive,
is obviously somewhat problematic. However, philosophical practitioners stress the λόγος of dialogue.
In addition to investigating how the dialogue is understood in the different philosophical practices, this
contribution aims at enhancing the διά, the “between” of dialogue. This dimension, in fact, may be a possible
theoretical framework within which to understand philosophical practices as a whole.
Article outline
- 1.Philosophical practices
- 2.Defining philosophical practices
- 3.Διαλέγεσθαι: practising the philosophical λόγος
- 3.1Socratic dialogue
- 3.2Philosophy for children
- 3.3Philosophical counselling
- 3.4Café-philo
- 4.Διάλογος: transcendentality and transcendence of the “between”
Notes References
References (52)
(2010). Zur Einführung der Philosophischen Praxis: Vorträge, Aufsätze, Gespräche und Essays, mit denen sich die Philosophische Praxis in den Jahren 1981 bis 2009 vorstellte; eine Dokumentation. Köln: Jürgen Dinter. This volume includes among other essays:
(2010a). Kurzgefaßte Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Philosophische Praxis? (pp. 15–17). (Original work published 1999).
(2010b). Philosophische Lebensberatung: Zur Kritik der auxiliaren Vernunft (pp. 31–41). (Original work published 1983).
Bertolino, L. (2008). Il problema della colpa: Per una fondazione della consulenza filosofica. In M. Buber, Colpa e sensi di colpa (L. Bertolino, Trans. & Ed.) (pp. 161–190). Milano: Apogeo.
(2016). Questioni di etica applicata per le pratiche filosofiche. Teoria: Rivista di filosofia, 36(2), 89–104.
Blanchard, J.-P. (2004). Des modes d’animation d’un café-philo. Diotime: Revue internationale de didactique de la philosophie, 22. Retrieved January 31, 2018, from [URL].
Brivio, G., & Bertolino, L. (2016). L’arte del dialogo nel café philo
. Teoria: Rivista di filosofia, 36(1), 151–169.
Buber, M. (1947). Dialogue. In Id., Between man and man (R. Gregor Smith, Trans.) (pp. 1–39). London: Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1929).
Cohen, E. D. (2003). The process of Logic-Based Therapy: an approach to philosophical counseling. Pratiche Filosofiche / Philosophy Practice, 1(2), 39–48.
(2013). Theory and practice of Logic-Based Therapy: Integrating critical thinking and philosophy into psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.
Curnow, T. (Ed.). (2001). Thinking through dialogue: Essays on philosophy in practice. Oxted: Practical Philosophy Press.
daVenza Tillmanns, M. (2005). Philosophical counseling: understanding the unique self and other through dialogue. International Journal of Philosophical Practice, 2(4), 1–10. Retrieved January 31, 2018, from [URL].
(1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press. (William James Lecture delivered 1967).
Grimes, P., & Uliana, R. L. (1998). Philosophical Midwifery: A new paradigm for understanding human problems with its validation. Costa Mesa, CA: Hyparxis Press.
Gutknecht, T. (2017). Über den Dialog in Philosophischer Praxis. In T. Gutknecht, H. Bennent-Vahle, & D. Schmalfuß-Plicht (Eds.), Kulturen des Dialogs: Vermittlungen Philosophischer Praxis (pp. 23–53). Berlin: Lit.
Hadot, P. (1995). Philosophy as a way of life: Spiritual exercises from Socrates to Foucault (M. Chase, Trans.; A. I. Davidson, Ed.). Oxford, UK; Cambridge, MA, USA: Blackwell.
Kant, I. (1996). An answer to the question: What is enlightenment? In Id., Practical philosophy (M. J. Gregor, Trans. & Ed.) (pp. 15–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1784).
(1998). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1781; 1787, 2nd ed.).
Kessels, J., Boers, E., & Mostert, P. (2009). Free space: Field guide to conversations (P. Mostert & G. Meter, Trans.). Amsterdam: Boom. (Original work published 2008).
Lahav, R. (2008). Cosa può imparare la consulenza filosofica da Buber? (I. Bertone, Trans.). In M. Buber, Colpa e sensi di colpa (L. Bertolino, Trans. & Ed.) (pp. 191–207). Milano: Apogeo.
(2016a). Handbook of philosophical-contemplative companionships: Principles, procedures, exercises. Chieti: Solfanelli.
(2016b). Stepping out of Plato’s cave: Philosophical practice and self-transformation. Hardwick, VT: Loyev Books.
Lindseth, A. (2005). Zur Sache der Philosophischen Praxis: Philosophieren in Gesprächen mit ratsuchenden Menschen. Freiburg: Karl Alber.
Lipman, M., Sharp, A. M., & Oscanyan, F. S. (1980). Philosophy in the classroom. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Mead, G. H. (1910). The psychology of social consciousness implied in instruction. Science, 31(801), 688–693. .
Nelson, L. (2004). The Socratic method (T. K. Brown III, Trans.). In R. Saran & B. Neisser (Eds.), Enquiring minds: Socratic dialogue in education (pp. 126–165). Stoke on Trent, UK; Sterling, VA, USA: Trentham Books. (Original work published 1929).
Peirce, C. S. (1877). Illustrations of the logic of sciences: I. The fixation of belief. Popular science monthly, 12, 1–15.
Phillips, C. (2002). Socrates café: A fresh taste of philosophy. New York, NY; London: W. W. Norton.
Plato (1913). Phaedrus. In Id., Euthyphro. Apology. Crito. Phaedo. Phaedrus (H. N. Fowler, Trans.) (pp. 405–579). London: William Heinemann; New York, NY: Macmillan.
(1921). Sophist. In Id., Theaetetus. Sophist (H. N. Fowler, Trans.) (pp. 259–459). London: William Heinemann; New York, NY: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
(2013a). Republic: Books 1–5 (C. Emlyn-Jones & W. Preddy, Trans. & Ed.). Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
(2013b). Republic: Books 6–10 (C. Emlyn-Jones & W. Preddy, Trans. & Ed.). Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
Saran, R., & Neisser, B. (Eds.). (2004). Enquiring minds: Socratic dialogue in education. Stoke on Trent, UK; Sterling, VA, USA: Trentham Books.
Sautet, M. (1995). Un café pour Socrate. Comment la philosophie peut nous aider à comprendre le monde d’aujourd’hui. Paris: Robert Laffont.
Saw, R. L. (1962). Conversation and communication. An inaugural lecture delivered at Birkbeck College, 29th October, 1962. London: Birkbeck College.
Schuster, S. C. (1999). Philosophy practice: An alternative to counseling and psychotherapy. Westport, CT; London: Praeger.
Volpone, A. (2000). Crisis of rationality and the return to philosophical practice. Retrieved October 15, 2000, from [URL].
