In:Science and Democracy: Controversies and conflicts
Edited by Pierluigi Barrotta and Giovanni Scarafile
[Controversies 13] 2018
► pp. 17–34
Chapter 1The dam project: Who are the experts?
A philosophical lesson from the Vajont disaster
In 1963 a huge landslide covered the Vajont valley (north-east of Italy), where one of the tallest arch dams in the world had been put in place (completed in 1959). More than 2000 people died. The locals had repeatedly warned the scientists that the sides of the valley were too fragile to hold significant impact, and publicly raised concern. The ensuing media debate surrounding issues of safety in the valley soon became manipulated for political purposes, and the important message got wasted.
With the help of this case study we analyse how two types of knowledge (official science and local experience) may confront each other and why they fail to interact. We then draw some lessons concerning how the use of expert knowledge becomes effective and valuable in the context of non-expert knowledge.
Keywords: experts, local knowledge, public opinion, inductive risk, fact/value dichotomy
Article outline
- 1.Preliminaries
- 2.The case study: Historical background
- 3.Two areas of neglect in expert judgement
- 4.By way of conclusion: A community of inquirers
Acknowledgments Notes References
References (22)
Barrotta, P. (2016). Scienza e democrazia. Roma: Carocci. Eng. Trans. Scientists, Democracy, and Society: A Community of Inquirers. Berlin and New York: Springer, forthcoming.
Betz, G. (2013). In Defence of the Value Free Ideal. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 3, 207–220.
Caloi, P. (1966). L’evento del Vajont nei suoi aspetti geodinamici. Annali di Geofisica. vol. 19, no. 1.
Cartwright, N. (1999). The Dappled World. A Study of the Boundaries of Science. , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Collins, H. & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking Expertise. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Galison, P. (1997). Image and Logic. A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Jeffrey, R. (1956). Valuation and Acceptance of Scientific Hypotheses. Philosophy of Science, 22, 197–217.
Merlin, T.. (1959). La SADE spadroneggia, L’Unità, May 5, also in [URL]
(2001). Sulla pelle viva. Come si costruisce una catastrofe. Il caso del Vajont, 4th ed., Verona: Cierre edizioni.
Montuschi, E.. (2011). Oggettività ed evidenza scientifica. Ricerca empirica, politiche sociali, scienza responsabile. Roma: Carocci.
Müller, L. (1961). Rapporto geologico per conto della SADE, Documenti utilizzati dal 1° gruppo di lavoro della Commissione. Senato Italiano (2003).
Paolini, M. & Vacis, G. (2013). Il racconto del Vajont. Nuova edizione con due saggi inediti. Milano: Garzanti.
Rudner, R. (1953). The Scientist qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments. Philosophy of Science, 20, 1–6.
Semenza, E. & Giudici, F. (1960). Studio geologico sul serbatoio del Vajont, Documentazione tecnica, Senato Italiano (2003).
Semenza, E. (2001). La storia del Vajont, raccontata dal geologo che ha scoperto la frana. Ferrara: K-flash.
Senato Italiano (2003). Commissione parlamentare d’inchiesta sul Vajont. Archivio storico, Soveria Mannelli: Rubettino.
Vecellio, P. (1965). Relazione su studi apparsi in pubblicazioni straniere dopo la sciagura del Vajont. Documenti redatti dal 1° Gruppo di lavoro della Commissione, Senato Italiano (2003).