Article published In: Chinese as a Second Language (漢語教學研究—美國中文教師學會學報)
Vol. 52:1 (2017) ► pp.77–92
从“知其然” 到“知其所以然”
在语言教学中培养思辨能力
Article language: Chinese
Published online: 4 September 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/csl.52.1.04zha
https://doi.org/10.1075/csl.52.1.04zha
摘要
当今众多语言教学法的主要目标是对学习者的语言能力培训。因此,衡量教学的成功与否大都通过语言技能来体现,尤其是语言交流能力。这一趋势不但反映在课堂教学上,而且也反映在语言教学研究、教师培训、教程和教材上。 Kinoshita & Zhang 于 Kinoshita, Y. and Zhang, Y. (2014). “Why do we teach languages at universities? Re-conceptualization of foreign language education.” Selected Proceedings of the Second National LCNAU Colloquium, 87–100. 年提出重新审视高等教育中语言教学的目的。她们认为,高等教育中的语言课应被视为一种“人文教育” (liberal arts education) ,目的是智能开发和超语言的知识传授。也就是说,高等教育中的语言课的重点之一应该是提高学习者的普遍认知水平,培养其思辨能力,使其对目的语国家和当今世界不但“知其然”、而且“知其所以然”。
本文将从人文教育这一视角来审视一个将“培训”和“教育”齐头并进的教学实践和体验,重点探讨人文教育在中高级汉语课中的体现,包括课程理念及一系列旨在使学习者深层次、多方面、零距离地探讨和思考今日中国的课堂活动,培养其全面、均衡的思辨能力,从而促使其对目的语国家(中国)的了解不但“知其然”, 而且“知其所以然”。
Abstract
From knowing what to knowing why: a liberal arts education approach in a Chinese language classroom
In Kinoshita, Y. and Zhang, Y. (2014). “Why do we teach languages at universities? Re-conceptualization of foreign language education.” Selected Proceedings of the Second National LCNAU Colloquium, 87–100., Kinoshita and Zhang called for a reconceptualization of foreign language teaching that advocates a “liberal arts” approach emphasizing the intellectual development beyond language facility. This paper is a reflection of a pedagogical practice that embraces this approach. The paper gives a detailed presentation and exposition of the design of a course that aims to promote a balanced and nuanced critical understanding of the target language country – China. The paper describes and discusses a suite of activities that engage pre-advanced students of L2 Chinese through in-depth contact with ideas and objects related to China, and the “why” of its contemporary issues.
Article outline
- 一.前言
- 二.外语学习的目的与价值
- 三.从“知其然”到“知其所以然”
- A. 课程设置
- B. 学生已经知道什么?
- C.
课程设置理念和实践
-
活动 A.
请进来
- 点评
-
活动 B.
讲座
- 点评
-
活动 C.
辩论
- 点评
-
活动 D.
走出去
- 点评
- 点评
- 点评
-
活动 A.
请进来
- 四.学习成果
- 五.结论
- Notes
References
References (21)
Blaich, C., Bost, A., Chan, E. and Lynch, R. (2004). “Defining liberal arts education.” Unpublished manuscript.
Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). “The logical problem of foreign language learning.” Linguistic Analysis, 201, 3–47.
Hyltenstam, K., and Abrahamsson, N. (2003). “Maturational constraints in SLA.” In J. Doughty and M. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp.538–588). Oxford: Blackwell.
Kinoshita, Y. (2008). “Using an audio-video chat program in language learning.” In F. Zhang and B. Barber (Eds.), The Handbook of Research on Computer-Enhanced Language Acquisition and Learning (pp.507–520). London: IGI Global.
Kinoshita, Y. and Zhang, Y. (2014). “Why do we teach languages at universities? Re-conceptualization of foreign language education.” Selected Proceedings of the Second National LCNAU Colloquium, 87–100.
Kramsch, C. (1993). “Language study as a border study: Experiencing difference.” European Journal of Education, 281, 349–358.
Li, D., and Liu, I. (2010). Reading into a new China: Integrated skills for advanced Chinese. 《变化中的中国》 (Vol 21). Boston: Cheng & Tsui Company, Inc.
Li, Z. 李朝晖. (2014). “目的语与非目的语的语言环境文化学习方式探讨” [Mùdìyǔ yǔ fēi mùdìyǔ de yǔyán huánjìng wénhuà xuéxí fāngshì tàntǎo: Discussion on the methods of cultural studies in target and non-target language settings]. 汉语国际传播研究 [Hànyǔ Guójì Chuánbō Yánjiū: Chinese Language International Communication Research], 61, 145–151.
Liddicoat, A., and Scarino, A. (2013). Intercultural language teaching and learning. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Markee, N., and Kasper, G. (2004). “Classroom talks: An introduction.” Modern Language Journal, 881, 491–500.
Murphey, T. (1997). “Content-based instruction in an EFL setting: Issues and strategies.” In M. A. Snow and D. Brinton (eds.), The content-based classroom. Longman.
Snow, M. A., and Brinton, D. (1997). The Content-based classroom: Perspectives and integrating language and content. Longman.
Swain, M. (1985). “Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development.” In S. M. Gass and C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition, (pp.235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Winter, D., McClelland, D., and Stewart, A. (1981). “A new case for the liberal arts: Assessing institutional goals and student development.” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
