Cover not available

Article published In: Chinese as a Second Language (漢語教學研究—美國中文教師學會學報)
Vol. 51:1 (2016) ► pp.29–61

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

CFL learners’ recognition and production of pragmatic routine formulae

 | University of Dayton
Published online: 30 June 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/csl.51.1.02yan
A pragmatic routine formula is any expression with a stable form that is commonly repeated in the routinized social interactions of a given culture. Previous research has reported that such pragmatic routine formulae are often underused by foreign language learners, even when they have been studying the language for a long time. To explore the reasons for this underuse, this study investigated the development of 59 Chinese as a foreign language (CFL) learners’ recognition and production of pragmatic routine formulae in situations they might encounter in China. Results showed that length of stay in the target language country had a significant effect on recognition but not on production. CFL learners with longer periods of residence abroad were able to recognize more pragmatic routine formulae, but which specific formulae were recognized depended on the interactional settings in which learners had engaged. Further analysis revealed that learning challenges may arise in three kinds of situations: (1) those requiring a pragmatic formula in the target language but a different formula in the learner’s native language, (2) those requiring a routine formula in the target language but no remarks in the native language, and (3) those in which the learner overgeneralizes a more familiar form.
References (25)
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2009). Conventional expressions as a pragmalinguistic resource: Recognition and production of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 591, 755–795. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2012). Formulas, routines, and conventional expressions in pragmatics research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 321, 206–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bastos, M.T. (2011). Proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction and the acquisition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 81, 347–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beebe, L.M., & Cummings, M.C. (1996). Natural speech act data versus written questionnaire data: How data collection method affects speech act performance. In S.M. Gass & J. Neu (Hg.), Speech acts across cultures (pp. 65–86). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belyavina, R. (2013). U.S. Students in China: Meeting the goals of the 100,000 strong initiative. New York, NY: Institute of International Education. Retrieved October 14, 2015, from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DuFon, M.A. (1999). The acquisition of linguistic politeness in Indonesian by sojourners in naturalistic interactions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Honolulu.
Edmondson, W., & House, J. (1991). Do learners talk too much? The waffle phenomenon in interlanguage pragmatics. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood Smith, & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign/second language pedagogy research: A commemorative volume for Claus Faerch (pp. 273–287). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisenstein, M., & Bodman, J.W. (1986). ‘I very appreciate’: Expressions of gratitude by native and non-native speakers of American English. Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 167–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardin, J.W., & Hilbe, J.M. (2003). Generalized estimating equations. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (1993). Interlanguage pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskes, I. (2000). Conceptual fluency and the use of situation-bound utterances. Links & Letters, 71, 145–161.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kwon, J. (2004). Expressing refusals in Korean and in American English. Multilingua, 231, 339–364. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G.N. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liang, K., & Zeger, S. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 731, 13–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liskin-Gasparro, J. (1982). ETS oral proficiency testing manual. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGinnis, S.M. (2003). Higher education foreign language needs: Student supply and demand. Retrieved October 14, 2015, from [URL]
Rodriguez, S. (2001). The perception of requests in Spanish by instructed learners of Spanish in the second- and foreign-language contexts: A longitudinal study of acquisition patterns. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roever, C. (2005). Testing ESL pragmatics: Development and validation of a web-based assessment battery. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2012). What learners get for free: Learning of routine formulae in ESL and EFL environments. ELT Journal, 661, 10–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegal, M. (1994). Looking east: Learning Japanese as a second language and the interaction of race, gender, and social context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Taguchi, N., Li, S., & Xiao, F. (2013). Production of formulaic expressions in L2 Chinese: A developmental investigation in a study abroad context. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 2(1), 23–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, J. (2007). How to say “No” in Chinese: A pedagogy of refusal for Chinese as a foreign language. Unpublished master’s thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yorio, C. (1989). Idiomaticity as an indicator of second language proficiency. In K. Hyltenstam & L.K. Obler (Eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan, (pp. 55–72). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Yang, Xi & Nooreiny Maarof
2024. Effects of exposure to L2 input and language proficiency on pragmatic competence during study abroad. Forum for Linguistic Studies 6:2 DOI logo
Roever, Carsten, Yuki Higuchi, Miyuki Sasaki, Tomoko Yashima & Makiko Nakamuro
2023. Validating a test of L2 routine formulae to detect pragmatics learning in stay abroad. Applied Pragmatics 5:1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Zhu, Junling
2023. Critical Literature Review on Teaching Chinese as a World Language in the Context of Globalization. Language and Sociocultural Theory 9:2 ► pp. 202 ff. DOI logo
Conti, Sergio & Carmen Lepadat
2021. Situation-bound utterances in Chinese as a foreign language: the effectiveness of the identification task. Chinese as a Second Language Research 10:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue