Article published In: Teacher-Student Engagement Patterns in CSL Classrooms and Beyond: Video-based multimodal analyses
Edited by Hongyin Tao and Yan Zhou
[Chinese as a Second Language (漢語教學研究—美國中文教師學會學報) 59:3] 2024
► pp. 279–307
Multimodal resources for managing student participation after unsuccessful designedly incomplete utterances in CSL classrooms
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with University of Alberta.
Published online: 1 April 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/csl.00059.wan
https://doi.org/10.1075/csl.00059.wan
Abstract
L2 teachers employ various multimodal resources, including designedly incomplete utterances (DIUs), to elicit
student response in classroom interaction. Building on the work of Wang, X., Li, X., & Li, S. (2024). Pursuing
student response through incomplete syntax, prosody, bodily- and visuo-orthographical resources in
Chinese-as-a-second-language classrooms. Classroom
Discourse, 1–27. ,
this study further investigates how Chinese-as-a-second-language (CSL) teachers use multimodal resources to elicit student
responses when DIUs fail to prompt a response. A two-step pattern has been observed in the data. First, the teachers routinely
employ scanning gaze and body holds to enhance student participation while they wait for a student response. After that,
interrogatives, repetition, and pedagogical artifacts (such as PowerPoint slides) are used as hints to increase the transparency
of answers. By providing a micro-level analysis of real classroom interaction and case distribution numbers, this paper
demonstrates how teachers orient to and address the issue of a lack of response. This research contributes to a deeper
understanding of classroom interactional competence and provides insights for enhancing language teaching practices.
摘要
在二语课堂互动中,教师会运用各种多模态资源来引导学生回应,包括句法非完整句式(DIU)。本文在Wang, X., Li, X., & Li, S. (2024). Pursuing
student response through incomplete syntax, prosody, bodily- and visuo-orthographical resources in
Chinese-as-a-second-language classrooms. Classroom
Discourse, 1–27. )基础上,进一步考察了在使用句法非完整句式未成功引起学生回应的情况下,教师是如何使用多模态资源引导学生回应的。本文观察到一个两步模式。首先,教师通常运用扫视和固定的身体姿势来增强学生的参与,同时等待学生的回应。其次,教师会通过使用疑问句、重复,以及教学工具(如幻灯片)等方式来对学生进行提示,从而提高答案的透明度。本文通过对真实课堂互动的微观分析和对案例分布数量的展示,探讨了在缺乏学生及时回应的情况下,教师如何理解这一问题并采取相应的应对策略。此研究有助于深化对课堂互动能力的认识,并为改进语言教学方法提供了启示。
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1Sequence incompleteness and responses elicitation in classrooms
- 2.2Gaze and Bodily-Holds in managing participation
- 3.Data and methodologies
- 4.Eliciting response after unsuccessful DIUs
- 4.1Using multimodal resources to enhance student participation
- 4.2Using multimodal resources to hint for co-completions
- 5.Discussion and conclusion
References
References (59)
Aldrup, M. (2019). ‘Well
let me put it uhm the other way around maybe’: Managing students’ trouble displays in the CLIL
classroom. Classroom
Discourse, 10(1), 46–70.
Balaman, U. (2019). Sequential
organization of hinting in online task-oriented L2 interaction. Text &
Talk, 39(4), 511–534.
Can Daşkın, N. & Hatipoğlu, C. (2019). Reference
to a past learning event in teacher turns in an L2 instructional setting. Journal of
Pragmatics, 1421, 16–30.
Chazal, K. (2015). Pedagogical
artifacts in teacher-initiated response pursuits: A conversation analytic study of interaction in the French foreign language
classroom. [Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, USA].
(2020). Multimodal
mechanisms for mobilizing students to give pre-structured responses in French L2 classroom
interaction. In C. Taleghani-Nikazm, E. Betz, P. Golato (Eds.), Mobilizing
others: Grammar and lexis within larger
activities (pp. 175–201). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
De Vos, C., Torreira, F., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Turn-timing
in signed conversations: Coordinating stroke-to-stroke turn boundaries. Frontiers in
Psychology, 61, Article 268.
Duran, D., & Jacknick, C. M. (2020). Teacher
response pursuits in whole class post-task discussions. Linguistics and
Education, 561, 100808.
Edwards, D. & Mercer, N. (1987). Common
knowledge: The development of understanding in the
classroom. London: Routledge.
Etehadieh, E., & Rendle-Short, J. (2016). Intersubjectivity
or preference: interpreting student pauses in supervisory meetings. Australian Journal of
Linguistics, 36(2), 172–188.
Floyd, S., Manrique, E., Rossi, G., & Torreira, F. (2016). The
timing of visual bodily behavior in repair sequences: evidence from three languages. Discourse
Process, 531, 175–204.
Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A. (2010). Responses
to wh-questions in English conversation. Research on Language and Social
Interaction, 43(2), 133–156.
Gardner, R. (2019). Classroom
interaction research: The state of the art. Research on Language and Social
Interaction, 52(3), 212–226.
Girard-Groeber, S. (2015). The
management of turn transition in signed interaction through the lens of overlaps. Frontiers in
Psychology, 61, Article 741.
Groeber, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2014). Turns
and turn-taking in sign language interaction: A study of turn-final holds. Journal of
Pragmatics, 651, 121–136.
Hosoda, Y. (2014). Missing
response after teacher question in primary school English as a foreign language
classes. Linguistics and
Education, 281, 1–16.
Jacknick, C. M. (2021). Multimodal
participation and engagement: Social interaction in the classroom. Edinburgh University Press.
Käänta, L. (2010). Teacher
turn-allocation and repair practices in classroom interaction: A multisemiotic
perspective. [Ph.D. dissertation, University of Jyväskylä], Jyväskylä.
Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly
incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction
sequences. Research on Language and Social
Interaction, 35(3), 277–309.
Lam Hoang, T. G., & Filipi, A. (2019). In
pursuit of understanding and response: A micro-analysis of language alternation practices in an EFL university context in
Vietnam. The Language Learning
Journal, 47(1), 116–129.
Lee, J. (2016). Teacher
entries into second turn positions: IRFs in collaborative teaching. Journal of
Pragmatics, 951, 1–15.
Lerner, G. H. (1995). Turn
design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse
Processes, 19(1), 111–131.
(2003). Selecting
next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in
Society, 32(2), 177–201.
Li, X. (2014). Multimodality,
interaction and turn-taking in Mandarin
conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2019). Researching
multimodality in Chinese interaction: A methodological
account. In X. Li and T. Ono (Eds.), Multimodality
in Chinese
interaction (pp. 24–62). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
Lin, F. (2014). A
conversation-analytic study of word searches in EFL classrooms. [Unpublished Ph.D.
dissertation, Newcastle University].
Lü, S. (1980). 《现代汉语八百词》[Xiandai Hanyu Babai
Ci: 800 Words in Modern
Chinese]. 商务印书馆 [Shangwu yinshuguan: Commercial
press].
Manrique, E. (2016). Other-initiated
repair in Argentine Sign Language. Open
Linguistics, 2(1), 1–34.
Margutti, P. (2006). “Are
you human beings?” order and knowledge construction through questioning in primary classroom
interaction. Linguistics and
Education, 17(4), 313–346.
(2010). On
designedly incomplete utterances: What counts as learning for teachers and students in primary classroom
interaction. Research on Language and Social
Interaction, 43(4), 315–345.
Matsumoto, Y. (2019). Material
moments: Teacher and student use of materials in multilingual writing classroom
interactions. The Modern Language
Journal, 103(1), 179–204.
McHoul, A. W. (1978). The
organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in
Society, 7(2), 183–213.
Mehan, H. (1979a). Learning
lessons: The social organization of classroom behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
(1979b). ‘What
time is it, Denise?’: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory into
Practice, 18(4), 285–294.
Mondada, L. (2007). Multimodal
resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse
Studies, 9(2), 194–225.
(2016). Multiple
temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing
multimodality. Research on Language and Social
Interaction, 51(1), 85–106.
Mortensen, K. (2008). Selecting
next speaker in the second language classroom: How to find a willing next speaker in planned
activities. Applied
Linguistics, 5(1), 55–79.
(2009). Establishing
recipiency in pre-beginning position in the second language classroom, Discourse
Processes, 46(5), 491–515.
Netz, H. (2016). Designedly
incomplete utterances and student participation. Linguistics and
Education, 331, 56–73.
Pekarek Doehler, S. (2021). L2
interactional competence and L2 education. In S. Kunitz, N. Markee, & O. Sert (Eds.), Classroom-based
conversation analytic research: Theoretical and applied perspectives on
pedagogy (pp. 417–424). Cham: Springer.
Rossano, F. (2012). Gaze
in conversation. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (Eds.), The
handbook of conversation
analysis (pp. 308–329), Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sacks, H. & Schegloff, E. A. (2002). Home
position. Gesture, 2(2), 133–46.
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing
in conversational practice. American
Anthropologist, 701, 1075–1095.
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The
interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis
perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Inc.
Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J. R., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Deppermann, A., Gilles, P., Günthner, S., Hartung, M., Kern, F., Mertzlufft, C., Meyer, C., Morek, M., Oberzaucher, F., Peters, J., Ouasthoff, U., Schutte, W., Stukenbrock, A., & Uhmann, S. (2009). Gesprächsanalytisches
Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung — Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen
Interaktion, 101, 353–402.
Sert, O. (2019). The
interplay between collaborative turn sequences and active listenership: Implications for the development of L2 interactional
competence. In R. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching
and testing L2 interactional competence: Bridging theory and
practice (pp. 110–131). New York: Routledge.
Sert, O. & Walsh, S. (2013). The
interactional management of claims of insufficient knowledge in English language
classrooms. Language and
Education, 27(6), 542–565.
Sidnell, J. (2005). Gesture
in the pursuit and display of recognition: A Caribbean case
study. Semiotica, 1561, 55–87.
Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing
response. Research on Language and Social
Interaction, 43(1), 3–31.
Tao, H. (1996). Units
in Mandarin conversation: Prosody, discourse, and
grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Walsh, S. (2002). Construction
or obstruction: Teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching
Research, 6(1), 3–23.
Wang, X., Li, X., & Li, S. (2024). Pursuing
student response through incomplete syntax, prosody, bodily- and visuo-orthographical resources in
Chinese-as-a-second-language classrooms. Classroom
Discourse, 1–27.
Waring, H. Z. (2015). Promoting
self-discovery in the language classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics in
Language
Teaching, 53(1), 61–85.
(2019). The
what and how of English language teaching: Conversation analytic
perspectives. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second
handbook of English language
teaching (pp. 1053–1070). Cham: Springer.
