Article published In: The Grammar of Canonical and Non-canonical Wh-constructions
Edited by C.-T. James Huang
[Concentric 51:2] 2025
► pp. 224–245
Word order optionality in question formation in Chinese copula clauses
Published online: 6 November 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.24043.fer
https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.24043.fer
Abstract
Alongside superiority shi shenme ‘what is superiority?,’ which displays a canonical word order, the order shenme shi superiority is also possible in Chinese. In this paper I argue that this optionality results from a derivation that starts with merger of the two heads shenme ‘what’ and superiority, which generates a head-head structure that cannot be labeled under Chomsky’s labeling algorithm. The system must therefore resort to movement of either shenme or superiority in order for the structure to be labeled. Evidence for this analysis comes from the fact that when the sentence contains phrasal elements like shenme yisi ‘what meaning’ or shenme ren ‘what person,’ the optionality disappears. I also examine examples involving other interrogative items in the language and claim that this optionality only obtains with shenme ‘what’ and shei ‘who,’ other superficially similar word order patterns being different in terms of their semantic properties. Finally, I discuss the implications of this analysis in the context of symmetry-breaking in the sense of Moro, Andrea. 2000. Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. and of . 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130.61:33–49. labeling algorithm.
Keywords: wh-in-situ, Chinese, question formation, word order, copula clauses, labeling algorithm
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.A non-canonical word order pattern
- 2.1Word order patterns in Chinese copula clauses
- 2.2Syntactic properties
- 2.3Examples involving other interrogative items
- 3.An analysis of the word order optionality
- 4.Theoretical considerations: Symmetry-breaking, phrasal status, and projection
- 5.Other possible examples of head-head merger
- 6.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- Notes
References
References (25)
Aoun, Joseph, and Yen-Hui Audrey Li. 1993. Wh-elements in-situ: Syntax or LF? Linguistic Inquiry 24.21:199–238.
Bošković, Željko. 2009. More on the no-DP analysis of article-less languages. Studia Linguistica 63.21:187–203.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 1991. On the Typology of Wh-questions. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
. 2021. What-as-why sentences in Cantonese. Why is ‘Why’ Unique?: Its Syntactic and Semantic Properties, ed. by Gabriela Soare, 219–246. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Chien, Wei-Hsuan Cathy. 2025. Deriving V-de Verb Copying Constructions in Mandarin Chinese. MA Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
. 2001. Derivation by phase. Ken Hale: A Life in Language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
. 2015. Problems of projection: Extensions. Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, ed. by Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann and Simona Matteini, 3–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L., and Mercedes Tubino-Blanco. 2023. Inferential interrogatives with qué in Spanish. Languages 8.41:1–23.
Lin, Jo-wang. 2010. A tenseless analysis of Mandarin Chinese revisited: A response to Sybesma 2007. Linguistic Inquiry 41.21:305–329.
. 2004. Linear compression as a trigger for movement. Triggers, ed. by Anne Breitbarth and Henk van Riemsdijk, 387–430. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
. 2020. The matrix: Merge and the typology of syntactic categories. Syntactic Architecture and its Consequences II: Between Syntax and Morphology, ed. by András Bárány, Theresa Biberauer, Jamie Douglas and Sten Vikner, 81–92. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Moro, Andrea, and Ian Roberts. 2023. The duality of syntax: Unstable structures, labelling and linearisation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 42.21:609–631.
Panagiotidis, Phoevos. 2002. Pronouns, Clitics and Empty Nouns. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Postal, Paul. 1969. On so-called ‘pronouns’ in English. Modern Studies in English, ed. by David A. Reibel and Sanford A. Schane. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Ritter, Elizabeth. 1995. On the syntactic category of pronouns and agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13.31:405–443.
Rizzi, Luigi. 2016. Labeling, maximality and the head-phrase distinction. The Linguistic Review 33.11:103–127.
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2021. On applicative why-questions in Chinese. Why is ‘Why’ Unique?: Its Syntactic and Semantic Properties, ed. By Gabriela Soare, 197–218. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Uriagereka, Juan. 1995. Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26.11:79–123.
Yang, Barry Chung-Yu. 2021. Two types of peripheral adjunct WHATs. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 47.11:61–92.
