Cover not available

Article published In: The Grammar of Canonical and Non-canonical Wh-constructions
Edited by C.-T. James Huang
[Concentric 51:2] 2025
► pp. 224245

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (25)
References
Aoun, Joseph, and Yen-Hui Audrey Li. 1993. Wh-elements in-situ: Syntax or LF? Linguistic Inquiry 24.21:199–238.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2009. More on the no-DP analysis of article-less languages. Studia Linguistica 63.21:187–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 1991. On the Typology of Wh-questions. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
. 2021. What-as-why sentences in Cantonese. Why is ‘Why’ Unique?: Its Syntactic and Semantic Properties, ed. by Gabriela Soare, 219–246. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chien, Wei-Hsuan Cathy. 2025. Deriving V-de Verb Copying Constructions in Mandarin Chinese. MA Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. Ken Hale: A Life in Language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130.61:33–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Problems of projection: Extensions. Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, ed. by Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann and Simona Matteini, 3–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L., and Mercedes Tubino-Blanco. 2023. Inferential interrogatives with qué in Spanish. Languages 8.41:1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, Jo-wang. 2010. A tenseless analysis of Mandarin Chinese revisited: A response to Sybesma 2007. Linguistic Inquiry 41.21:305–329. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah. 2015. Tense in Mandarin Chinese sentences. Syntax 18.31:320–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moro, Andrea. 2000. Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Linear compression as a trigger for movement. Triggers, ed. by Anne Breitbarth and Henk van Riemsdijk, 387–430. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. The matrix: Merge and the typology of syntactic categories. Syntactic Architecture and its Consequences II: Between Syntax and Morphology, ed. by András Bárány, Theresa Biberauer, Jamie Douglas and Sten Vikner, 81–92. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moro, Andrea, and Ian Roberts. 2023. The duality of syntax: Unstable structures, labelling and linearisation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 42.21:609–631.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panagiotidis, Phoevos. 2002. Pronouns, Clitics and Empty Nouns. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Postal, Paul. 1969. On so-called ‘pronouns’ in English. Modern Studies in English, ed. by David A. Reibel and Sanford A. Schane. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth. 1995. On the syntactic category of pronouns and agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13.31:405–443. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2016. Labeling, maximality and the head-phrase distinction. The Linguistic Review 33.11:103–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint. 2007. Whether we tense-agree overtly or not. Linguistic Inquiry 38.31:580–587. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2021. On applicative why-questions in Chinese. Why is ‘Why’ Unique?: Its Syntactic and Semantic Properties, ed. By Gabriela Soare, 197–218. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1995. Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26.11:79–123.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Barry Chung-Yu. 2021. Two types of peripheral adjunct WHATs. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 47.11:61–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue