Article published In: Concentric
Vol. 49:2 (2023) ► pp.261–294
On the general classifiers ge and zàg in Hakka
A corpus-based collostructional analysis
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 2 November 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.23003.hua
https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.23003.hua
Abstract
This paper investigates the distribution and properties of the Hakka general classifiers ge and
zàg. We focus on the [determiner/numeral + classifier + noun] construction where we observe the relations
between the general classifiers and their following nouns, chosen based on their frequency in this construction. We adopt a
corpus-based collostructional analysis which calculates the collocational strength values of ge and
zàg with following nouns. A Hakka corpus was compiled for the study. The three-way distinction in the
collostructional analysis (attractive, neutral, and repulsive) is directly mapped to acceptability of various degrees. The results
show that ge is highly correlated with human-denoting nouns, whereas zàg is highly correlated
with animal-denoting nouns. Nouns denoting abstract entities or concrete objects without physical properties like size or shape
usually lack specific classifiers, and both ge and zàg can collocate with them, albeit with
varying degrees of preference. We argue that both ge and zàg are general classifiers because
both are more frequently used than specific classifiers and both exhibit disjointed semantic distribution and allow abstract
nouns. While they show preferences for different nouns, requirements to qualify as general classifiers are equally met.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 3.Theoretical framework
- 3.1The constructional approach
- 3.2The collostructional analysis
- 4.The compilation of the Hakka corpus
- 5.The procedures
- 6.The results
- 6.1The general distribution
- 6.2Zone A: Nouns attracted to ge
- 6.3Zone B: Nouns attracted to zàg
- 6.4Zone C: Nouns neutral to both ge and zàg
- 6.5Zone D: Nouns repelled by either ge or zàg, or both
- 7.Discussion
- 7.1General classifiers
- 7.1.1Ge
- 7.1.2Zàg
- 7.1.3Distribution of human-denoting and animal-denoting nouns
- 7.2Specific classifiers
- 7.2.1Tiǎu
- 7.2.2Gí
- 7.2.3Liab
- 7.2.4De
- 7.2.5Vi
- 7.2.6Mí
- 7.2.7Ton
- 7.3Comparison of general classifiers and specific classifiers
- 7.1General classifiers
- 8.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (26)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Chiu, Hsiang-Yun. 2007. Minnanyu he kejiahua de liangci: Yu guoyu bijiao [Measure words of Southern Min and Hakka: A comparison with Mandarin]. Hsuan Chuang Humanities Journal 71:175–206.
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Mary Catherine O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64.3:501–538.
Frankowsky, Maximilian, and Dan Ke. 2016. Humanness and classifiers in Mandarin Chinese: A corpus-based study of anthropocentric classification. Language and Cognitive Science 2.1:55–67.
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
2003. Construction at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Gries, Stefan Th., and Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2004a. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9.1:97–129.
. 2004b. Covarying collexemes in the into-causative. Language, Culture, and Mind, ed. by Michel Achard and Suzanne Kemmer, 225–236. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Gries, Stefan Th., Beate Hampe, and Doris Schönefeld. 2005. Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16.4:635–676.
Hakka Affairs Council. 2022. Taiwan Hakka Corpus. Retrieved November 26, 2022, from [URL]
Her, One-Soon, and Chen-Tien Hsieh. 2010. On the semantic distinction between classifiers and measure words in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 11.3:527–551.
Huang, Han-Chun. 2021. Yi dapei jiegou fenxi kan keyu zhong si ge biaoshi “ren” de fenleici [On four human-denoting classifiers in Hakka: A collostructional analysis]. Proceedings for the 30th Anniversary of Taiwan Languages and Literature Society, ed. by Shu-chuan Chen and Min-hua Chiang, 177–193. Taipei: Taiwanese Languages and Literature Society.
Kay, Paul, and Charles J. Fillmore. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The what’s X doing Y? construction. Language 75.1:1–33.
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Manning, Christopher D., and Hinrich Schütze. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Myers, James. 2000. Rules vs. analogy in Mandarin classifier selection. Language and Linguistics 1.2:187–209.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Stefan Th. Gries. 2003. Collocations: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8.2:209–243.
Tai, James Hao-Yi. 1994. Chinese classifier systems and human categorization. In Honor of Professor William S.-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary Studies on Language and Language Change, ed. by Matthew Y. Chen and Ovid Jyh-Lang Tzeng, 479–494. Taipei: Pyramid Press.
. 2006. Fenleici “wei” zai taiwan minnanyu yu keyu zhong de fanchou jiegou zhi bijiao [A comparison of categorial structures of classifier bue53/mi24 in Taiwan Southern Min and Hakka]. ON AND OFF WORK: Festschrift in Honor of Professor Chin-Chuan Cheng on his 70th Birthday, ed. by Raung-Fu Chung, Hsien-Chin Liou, Jia-Ling Hsu and Dah-an Ho, 57–73. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Tai, James Hao-Yi, and Lianqing Wang. 1990. A semantic study of the classifier tiao. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 251:35–56.
Tai, James Hao-Yi, and Li-wen Wu. 2006. Taiwan sixian keyu liangci “wei” de fanchou jiegou [Categorical structure of the classifier mi24 ‘tail’ in Sixian Hakka]. Language and Linguistics 7.2:501–521.
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2013. Classifier Structures in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Zubin, David A., and Mitsuaki Shimojo. 1993. How ‘general’ are general classifiers? With special reference to ko and tsu in Japanese. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Semantic Typology and Semantic Universals, ed. by J. Guenter, B. Kaiser and C. Zoll, 490–502. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
