In:New Perspectives on Mauritian Creole and Reunion Creole: Standardization, grammar and language use
Edited by Muhsina Alleesaib and Julie Lefort
[Contact Language Library 61] 2025
► pp. 96–118
Chapter 3Mauritian root modals are raising verbs
Published online: 7 April 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/coll.61.03mel
https://doi.org/10.1075/coll.61.03mel
Abstract
In Mauritian Creole, the forms kapav and bizin are interpreted as
epistemic or root modals depending on where they appear. They express root modality before the verb and epistemic
modality preceding TMA markers. I argue that Mauritian Creole root modals are raising verbs that select VoiceP. I show
that, like raising verbs, root modals: (1) are bi-clausal, (2) permit expletive subjects, and (3) can have wide/narrow
scope over quantified subjects. I further argue that epistemic bizin and kapav are
not verbs at all by showing they do not share the properties illustrated of their root counterparts. I conclude that
bizin and kapav are vocabulary items that spell out distinct syntactic heads;
their different modal flavours derive from their scopal relations.
Keywords: Mauritian Creole, French-based Creoles, modals, raising verbs, root modality
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Tense, mood, aspect, and modality in Mauritian Creole
- 2.1TMA and negation
- 2.2Modality
- 2.3Bizin and kapav are not TMA markers
- 3.Root kapav and bizin are raising verbs
- 3.1Raising verbs
- 3.2Root modality conveyed by raising verbs
- 4.Epistemic kapav and bizin are adverbs
- 5.Conclusions
Notes References
References (16)
Adone, Dany. 1994. The
Acquisition of Mauritian
Creole. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2008. Dutch
modal complement ellipsis. In Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Proceedings
of Empirical Issues in Syntax and
Semantics 7, 7–33.
. 2010. The
Syntactic Licensing of
Ellipsis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
. 2012. Modal
complement ellipsis: VP ellipsis in Dutch? In Peter Ackema, Rhona Alcorn, Caroline Heycock, Dany Jaspers, Jeroen Van Craenenbroeck, and Guido Vanden Wyngaerd (eds.), Comparative
Germanic Syntax: The state of the
art, 1–34. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Barbiers, Sjef. 2006. The
Syntax of Modal Auxiliaries. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.). The
Blackwell companion to
syntax 1. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs
and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic
Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Enç, Mürvet. 1996. Tense
and Modality. In Shalom Lappin (ed.), The
Handbook of contemporary Semantic
Theory, 345–358. Oxford: Blackwell.
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. ‘Distributed
Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection.’ In Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds.). The
View from
Building 20, 111–176. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Henri, Fabiola & Frédéric Laurens. 2011. The
Complementation of Raising and Control Verbs in Mauritian. Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical
Issues in Syntax and
Semantics 8. 195–219.
May, Robert. 1977. The
Grammar of
Quantification. Cambridge: MIT Ph.D. Dissertation.
