In:Variation Rolls the Dice: A worldwide collage in honour of Salikoko S. Mufwene
Edited by Enoch O. Aboh and Cécile B. Vigouroux
[Contact Language Library 59] 2021
► pp. 105–131
Acquisition or shift?
Interpreting variation in Gurindji children’s expression of spatial relations
Published online: 12 October 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/coll.59.05dun
https://doi.org/10.1075/coll.59.05dun
Abstract
This chapter examines the spatial description system employed by Gurindji children in Kalkaringi (Northern Territory, Australia) to describe ternary relations in small-scale space. While Gurindji is the traditional language of Kalkaringi, a new variety, Gurindji Kriol, has developed as a result of language contact, and is now the first language of young adults and children. Speakers of Gurindji use cardinal directions in descriptions of both small-scale and large-scale space, whereas cardinal terms are almost never used to describe small-scale in naturally-occurring Gurindji Kriol speech. We show that the strategies preferred by children differ from those used by their parents, who produce predominantly cardinal descriptions. Instead, Gurindji Kriol-speaking children show variable use between cardinals and landmark-based strategies.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The absolute FoR, bilingualism and language change
- 3.Changes in the use of the absolute frame of reference
- 4.Experimental task: “Man and Tree”
- 4.1Procedure
- 4.2Participants
- 4.3Coding
- 4.4Summary of major strategies used
- 4.4.1Children’s use of cardinals
- 4.4.2Children’s use of landmarks
- 4.5Discussion
- 4.5.1Acquisition or language change?
- 4.5.2A landmark-based or quasi-absolute system?
- 5.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (45)
Adamou, E.
2017. Spatial language and cognition among the last Ixcatec-Spanish bilinguals (Mexico). In
Multidisciplinary Approaches to Bilingualism in the Hispanic and Lusophone World [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 13], K.
Bellamy, M. W.
Child, P.
González, A.
Muntendam & M. C.
Parafita Couto
(eds), 175–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bohnemeyer, J. & Stoltz, C.
2006. Spatial reference in Yukatek Maya: A survey. In
Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity, S. C.
Levinson & D.
Wilkins
(eds), 273–310. Cambridge: CUP.
Brown, P.
2006. A sketch of the grammar of space in Tzeltal. In
Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity, S. C.
Levinson & D.
Wilkins
(eds), 230–272. Cambridge: CUP.
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C.
2000. Frames of spatial reference and their acquisition in Tenejapan Tzeltal. In
Culture, Thought, and Development, L.
Nucci, G.
Saxe & E.
Turiel
(eds), 167–197. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2009. Language as mind tools: Learning how to think through speaking. In
Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Traditions of Dan Slobin, J.
Guo, E. V.
Lieven, N.
Budwig, S.
Ervin-Tripp, K.
Nakamura & S.
Ozcaliskan
(eds), 451–464. New York NY: Psychology Press.
Cablitz, G.
2002. The acquisition of an absolute system: Learning to talk about space in Marquesan (Oceanic, French Polynesia). In
Space in Language: Location, Motion, Path, and Manner, E. V.
Clark
(ed.), 40–49. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Danziger, E.
2010. Deixis, gesture, and cognition in spatial frame of reference typology. Studies in Language
34: 167–185.
Dasen, P. & Mishra, R.
2010. Development of Geocentric Spatial Language and Cognition: An Eco-cultural Perspective.
Cambridge: CUP.
De León, L.
1994. Exploration in the acquisition of geocentric location by Tzotzil children. Linguistics
32: 857–884.
1995. The Development of Geocentric Location in Young Speakers of Guugu Yimithirr [Working Paper 32]. Nijmegen, Netherlands: Cognitive Anthropology Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Edmonds-Wathen, C.
2014. Influences of indigenous language on spatial frames of reference in Aboriginal English. Mathematics Education Research Journal
26: 169–192.
Laughren, M.
1978. Directional terminology in Warlpiri. Working Papers in Languages and Linguistics
8: 1–16.
Levinson, S. C.
(ed.)
1992. Space Stimuli Kit 1.2: November 1992. <[URL]> (24 May 2020).
Levinson, S. C., Brown, P., Danziger, E., De León, L., Haviland, J. B., Pederson, E. & Senft, G.
1992. Man and Tree & Space Games. In
Space Stimuli Kit 1.2: November 1992, S. C.
Levinson
(ed.)
7–14. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. <[URL]> (20 April 2020).
Levinson, S. C., Kita, S., Haun, D. B. M. & Rasch, B. H.
2002. Returning the tables: Language affects spatial reasoning. Cognition
84: 155–188.
Levinson, S. C. & Wilkins, D.
2006. The background to the study of the language of space. In
Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity, S. C.
Levinson & D.
Wilkins
(eds), 1–23. Cambridge: CUP.
Li, P. & Gleitman, L.
2002. Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition
83: 265–294.
MacWhinney, B.
2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D. B. M. & Levinson, S. C.
2004. Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences
8: 108–114.
Marghetis, T., McComsey, M. & Cooperrider, K.
2014. Spatial reasoning in bilingual Mexico: Delimiting the influence of language. In
Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, P.
Bello, M.
Guarini, M.
McShane & B.
Scassellati
(eds), 940–945. Austin TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Meakins, F.
2009. The case of the shifty ergative marker: A pragmatic shift in the ergative marker in one Australian mixed language. In
The Role of Semantics and Pragmatics in the Development of Case [Studies in Language Companion Series 108], J.
Barðdal & S.
Chelliah
(eds), 59–91. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2011. Spaced out: Intergenerational changes in the expression of spatial relations by Gurindji people. Australian Journal of Linguistics
31: 43–77.
2013. Gurindji Kriol. In
The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages, Vol. 3, S.
Michaelis, P.
Maurer, M.
Haspelmath & M.
Huber
(eds), 131–139. Oxford: OUP.
2015. From absolutely optional to only nominally ergative: The life cycle of the Gurindji Kriol ergative suffix. In
Borrowed Morphology, F.
Gardani, P.
Arkadiev & N.
Amiridze
(eds), 189–218. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Meakins, F. & Algy, C.
2016. Deadly reckoning: Changes in Gurindji children’s knowledge of cardinals. Australian Journal of Linguistics
36: 479–501.
Meakins, F., Hua, X., Algy, C. & Bromham, L.
2019. The birth of a new language does not favour simplification. Language
95(2): 294–332.
Meakins, F., Jones, C. & Algy, C.
2016. Bilingualism, language shift and the corresponding expansion of spatial cognitive systems. Language Sciences
54: 1–13.
Meakins, F., McConvell, P., Charola, E., McNair, N., McNair, H. & Campbell, L.
2013. Gurindji to English Dictionary.
Batchelor, Northern Territory: Batchelor Press.
Meakins, F. & Wilmoth, S.
2020. Overabundance resulting from language contact: Complex cell-mates in Gurindji Kriol. In
The Complexities of Morphology, P.
Arkadiev & F.
Gardani
(eds), 81–104. Oxford: OUP.
O’Meara, C. & Pérez Báez, G.
2011. Spatial frames of reference in Mesoamerican languages. Language Sciences
33: 837–852.
Pederson, E.
1993. Geographic and manipulable space in two Tamil linguistic systems. In
Spatial Information Theory, A. U.
Frank & I.
Campari
(eds), 294–311. Berlin: Springer.
Pederson, E., Danziger, E., Wilkins, D., Levinson, S. C., Kita, S. & Senft, G.
1998. Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language
74: 557–589.
Polian, G. & Bohnemeyer, J.
2011. Uniformity and variation in Tseltal reference frame use. Language Sciences
33: 868–891.
Schultze-Berndt, E.
2006. Sketch of a Jaminjung grammar of space. In
Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity, S. C.
Levinson & D.
Wilkins
(eds), 63–114. Cambridge: CUP.
Senft, G.
2006. Prolegomena to a Kilivila grammar of space. In
Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity, S. C.
Levinson & D.
Wilkins
(eds), 206–229. Cambridge: CUP.
Talmy, L.
1983. How language structures space. In
Spatial Orientation, H. L.
Pick & L. P.
Acredolo
(eds), 225–320. New York NY: Plenum Press.
Terrill, A. & Burenhult
N.
2008. Orientation as a strategy of spatial reference. Studies in Language
32: 93–136.
Van den Bos, J., Meakins, F. & Algy, C.
2017. Searching for “Agent Zero”: The origins of a relative case. Language Ecology
1: 4–24.
Van Leeuwen, M. S.
1978. A cross-cultural examination of psychological differentiation in males and females. International Journal of Psychology
13: 87–122.
Wilkins, D.
1989. Mparntwe Arrernte (Aranda): Studies in the Structures and Semantics of Grammar. PhD dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Meakins, Felicity, Kathleen Jepson & Cassandra Algy
Meakins, Felicity, Lindell Bromham & Xia Hua
Cerqueglini, Letizia
Edmonds-Wathen, Cris
Green, Jennifer, Felicity Meakins & Cassandra Algy
Hoffmann, Dorothea, Bill Palmer & Alice Gaby
Lum, Jonathon, Bill Palmer, Jonathan Schlossberg & Alice Gaby
Sloan, Bodean, Felicity Meakins & Cassandra Algy
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
