Cover not available

In:Variation Rolls the Dice: A worldwide collage in honour of Salikoko S. Mufwene
Edited by Enoch O. Aboh and Cécile B. Vigouroux
[Contact Language Library 59] 2021
► pp. 23–56

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

A sociolinguistic typology for languages in contact

 | University of New Mexico
Published online: 12 October 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/coll.59.02cro
Abstract
Different types of languages evolve in situations of human social contact, depending on the nature of the contact and the attitudes on the part of the speakers towards the societies in contact. Three socially-defined language types are useful for classifying contact languages. One may distinguish between an esoteric language, used for communication within a speech community, and an exoteric language used for communication between different speech communities. The third language type, a neogenic language, results when speech communities merge (e.g., in colonisation). Each language type involves a continuum depending on the degree and asymmetry of the social contact between speech communities. This chapter describes these continua, the “contact” or “mixed” languages that they account for, and their structural linguistic correlates.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Linguistic features, or linguemes
    • 1.2Evolutionary linguistics and language contact
  • 2.Towards a sociolinguistic typology of languages with respect to intersocietal contact
  • 3.The exoteric language continuum and its relation to social organization
    • 3.1Pidgins and the exoteric language continuum
    • 3.2Exoteric languages and social organization
    • 3.3African lingua francas before, or in apparent absence of, European contact
    • 3.4African lingua francas in the context of European contact
    • 3.5North American lingua francas and trade pidgins
    • 3.6Pidgins in Papua New Guinea before European contact
    • 3.7Social changes and changes in the type of exoteric language
  • 4.The neogenic language continuum
    • 4.1Language shift and lingua francas
    • 4.2Neogeny from closely related varieties: Koiné and standard
    • 4.3Neogeny involving speakers of sharply distinct varieties: Restructured varieties and creoles
  • 5.“Mixed languages” and the esoteric language continuum
    • 5.1Neogeny and “mixed languages”: Mixed-marriage languages and semi-shift
    • 5.2Increasing esotericism and “mixed languages”: Death by borrowing
    • 5.3Sources of linguemes in “mixed languages”
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (79)
References
Adelaar, W. F. H. 1996a. Areas of multilingualism in Northern South America. In Wurm et al.. (eds), 1345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996b. The Tupí-Guaraní languages of Atlantic South America, and Línguas Gerais. In Wurm et al.. (eds), 1333–1334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alpher, B. & Nash, D. 1999. Lexical replacement and cognate equilibrium in Australia. Australian Journal of Linguistics 19: 5–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andersen, H. 1988. Center and periphery: Adoption, diffusion, and spread. In Historical Dialectology: Regional and Social, J. Fisiak (ed.), 39–83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakker, P. 1997. A Language of Our Own: The Genesis of Michif, the Mixed Cree-French Language of the Canadian Métis. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakker, P. & Grant, A. P. 1996. Interethnic communication in Canada, Alaska and adjacent areas. In Wurm et al.. (eds), 1107–1169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakker, P. & Papen, R. A. 1997. Michif: A mixed language based on Cree and French. In Thomason (ed.), 295–363. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blythe, R. A. & Croft, W. 2012. S-curves and the mechanisms of propagation in language change. Language 88: 269–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowern, C., Epps, P., Gray, R., Hill, J., Hunley, K., McConvell, P. & Zentz, J. 2011. Does lateral transmission obscure inheritance in hunter-gatherer languages? PLoS One 6 (9): e25195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clackson, J. & Horrocks, G. 2007. The Blackwell History of the Latin Language. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crawford, J. M. 1978. The Mobilian Trade Language. Knoxville TN: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. Mixed languages and acts of identity: An evolutionary approach. In The Mixed Language Debate, Y. Matras & P. Bakker (eds), 41–72. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. Review of Language Evolution: Contact, Competition and Change by Salikoko S. Mufwene. World Englishes 29: 306–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. 2004. The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity [Studies in Language Companion Series 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. & Velupillai, V. 2013. The past tense. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (28 January 2019).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. M. 1916. Modern Greek in Asia Minor: A Study of the Dialects of Silli, Cappadocia and Pháras with Grammars, Texts, Translations, and Glossary. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donald, L. 1984. The slave trade on the Northwest Coast of North America. Research in Economic Anthropology 6: 121–158.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drechsel, E. J. 1996. Native American contact languages of the contiguous United States. In Wurm, et al.. (eds), 1213–1239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. Mobilian Jargon: Linguistic and Sociohistorical Aspects of a Native American Pidgin. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dutton, T. 1983. Birds of a feather: A pair of rare pidgins from the Gulf of Papua. In The Social Context of Creolization, E. Woolford & W. Washabaugh (eds), 77–105. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. Hiri trading languages. In Wurm, et al.. (eds), 233–236.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foley, W. 1988. Language birth: The processes of pidginization and creolization. In Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Vol. 4, F. J. Newmeyer (ed.), 162–183. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, I. 1997. Pidgin Delaware. In Thomason (ed.), 43–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Görlach, M. (ed.). 2001. A Dictionary of European Anglicisms. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. 1999. Are there mixed languages? In Essays in Poetics, Literary History and Linguistics presented to Viacheslav Vsevolodovich Ivanov on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday, L. Fleishman, M. Gasparov, T. Nikolaeva, A. Ospovat, V. Toporov, A Vigasin, R. Vroon & A. Zalizniak (eds), 626–633. Moscow: OGI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenhill, S. J., Currie, T. E. & Gray, R. D. 2009. Does horizontal transmission invalidate cultural phylogenies? Proceedings of the Royal Society B 276: 2299–2307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. & Wilson, R. 1971. Convergence and creolization: A case from the Indo-Aryan/Dravidian border. In Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, D. Hymes (ed.), 151–167. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harrison, S. 1987. Cultural efflorescence and political evolution on the Sepik River. American Ethnologist 14: 491–507. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugen, E. 1966a/1972. Semicommunication: The language gap in Scandinavia. Sociological Inquiry 36: 280–297. Reprinted in The Ecology of Language: Essays by Einar Haugen, A. S. Dil (ed.), 215–236. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1966b/1972. Dialect, language, nation. American Anthropologist 68: 922–935. Reprinted in The Ecology of Language: Essays by Einar Haugen, A. S. Dil (ed.), 237–254. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B. 1970. Status and Use of African Lingua Francas. Munich: Weltforum Verlag/New York NY: Humanities Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holm, J. 1989. Pidgins and Creoles, Vol. 2: Reference Survey. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Languages in Contact: The Partial Restructuring of Vernaculars. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horrocks, G. 2010. Greek: A History of the Language and its Speakers. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1980. Commentary. In Theoretical Orientations in Creole Studies, A. Valdman & A. Highfield (eds), 389–423. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, A. W. & Earle, T. 2000. The Evolution of Human Societies: From Foraging Group to Agrarian State, 2nd edn. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kulick, D. 1993. Growing up monolingual in a multilingual community: How language socialization patterns are leading to language shift in Gapun (Papua New Guinea). In Progression and Regression in Language, K. Hyltenstam & Å. Viberg (eds), 94–121. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee-Smith, M. W. 1996. The Ejnu language. In Wurm, et al.. (eds), 851–863. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee-Smith, M. W. & Wurm, S. A. 1996. The Wutun language. In Wurm et al. (eds), 883–897. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lincoln, P. C. 1979/80. Dual lingualism: Passive bilingualism in action. Te Reo (22/23): 65–72.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lodge, R. A. 1993. French: From Dialect to Standard. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lupyan, G. & Dale, R. 2010. Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS One 5(1): e8559. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matras, Y. 2000. Mixed languages: A functional-communicative approach. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition 3: 79–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDowell, P. 2017. Political anthropology: A cross-cultural comparison. In Perspectives: An Open Invitation to Cultural Anthropology, N. Brown, L. Tubelle de González & T. McIlwraith (eds). <[URL]> (22 August 2018).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Menovščikov, G. A. 1969. O nekotoryx social’nyx aspektax èvoljucii jazyka. In Voprosy Social’noj Lingvistki, 110–134. Leningrad: Nauka. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mous, M. 1994. Ma’a or Mbugu. In Mixed Languages, P. Bakker & M. Mous (eds), 175–200. Amsterdam: Institute for Functional Research into Language and Language Use (IFOTT), University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. Créole, Écologie Sociale, Évolution Linguistique. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Language Evolution: Contact, Competition and Change. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017a. Language vitality: The weak theoretical underpinnings of what can be an exciting research area. Language 93: e202–e223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017b. It’s still worth theorizing on LEL, despite the heterogeneity and complexity of the processes (Response to commentators). Language 93: e306–e316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, P. 2013. Norf’k. In The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages, Vol. 1: English-Based and Dutch-Based Languages, S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (eds), 232–240. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, P., Dutton, T., Hovdhaugen, E., Williams, J. & Wurm, S. A. 1996. Precolonial patterns of intercultural communication in the Pacific Islands. In Wurm et al. (eds), 401–437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muysken, P. 1997. Media Lengua. In Thomason (ed.), 365–426. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muysken, P. & Smith, N. (eds). 2015. Surviving the Middle Passage: The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newton, B. 1964. An Arabic-Greek dialect. Papers in Memory of George C. Pappageotes (supplement to) Word 20: 43–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oram, N. 1982. Pots for sago: The hiri trading network. In The Hiri in History: ?Further Aspects of Long Distance Motu Trade in Central Papua, T. Dutton (ed.), 3–33. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, A. S. C. & Moverley, A. W. 1964. The Pitcairnese Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, M. D. 1996. Contact-induced change and the comparative method: Cases from Papua New Guinea. In The Comparative Method Reviewed: Irregularity and Regularity in Language Change, M. Durie & M. D. Ross (eds), 180–217. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samarin, W. J. 1982. Colonization and pidginization on the Ubangi River. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 4: 1–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1986. Chinook Jargon and pidgin historiography. Canadian Journal of Anthropology/Revue Canadienne d’Anthropologie 5: 23–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1987. Demythologizing Plains Sign Language history. International Journal of American Linguistics 53: 65–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1988. Jargonization before Chinook Jargon. Northwest Anthropological Research Notes 22: 219–238.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990/1991. The origins of Kituba and Lingala. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 12: 47–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. 1996. Dynamics of linguistic contact. In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 17: Language, I. Goddard (ed.), 117–136. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, A. R. 1975. Nonverbal communications systems in native North America. Semiotica 4: 329–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1981. Indian lingua francas. In Language in the USA, C. A. Ferguson & S. Brice Heath (eds), 175–195. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ten Thije, J. D. & Zeevaert, L. (eds). 2007. Receptive Multilingualism: Linguistic Analyses, Language Policies and Didactic Concepts [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G. 1997. Ma’a (Mbugu). In Thomason (ed.), 469–487. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 1997. Contact Languages: A Wider Perspective [Creole Language Library 17]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G. & Kaufman, T. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thurston, W. R. 1987. Processes of Change in the Languages of North-Western New Britain [Pacific Linguistics, Series B. 99]. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, The Australian National University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1989. How exoteric languages build a lexicon: Esoterogeny in West New Britain. In VICAL 1, Oceania Languages: Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, R. Harlow & R. Hooper (eds), 555–579. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tria, F., Sevedio, V. D. P., Mufwene, S. S. & Loreto, V. 2015. Modeling the emergence of contact languages. PLoS One 10(4): e0120771. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. & Hannah, J. 1994. International English, 3rd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wurm, S. A., Mühlhäusler, P. & Tryon, D. T. (eds). 1996. Atlas of Languages of Intercultural Communication in the Pacific, Asia, and the Americas. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Fried, Mirjam & Kiki Nikiforidou
2025. Construction Grammar. In The Cambridge Handbook of Construction Grammar, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Sinnemäki, Kaius, Francesca Di Garbo, Ricardo Napoleão de Souza & T. Mark Ellison
2024. A typological approach to language change in contact situations. Diachronica 41:3 ► pp. 379 ff. DOI logo
Di Garbo, Francesca & Ricardo Napoleão de Souza
2023. A sampling technique for worldwide comparisons of language contact scenarios. Linguistic Typology 27:3 ► pp. 553 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue