In:Negation and Negative Concord: The view from Creoles
Edited by Viviane Déprez and Fabiola Henri
[Contact Language Library 55] 2018
► pp. 289–311
Get fulltext
Cross-linguistic negation contrasts in co-convergent contact languages
This article is available free of charge.
Published online: 12 December 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/coll.55.13slo
https://doi.org/10.1075/coll.55.13slo
Abstract
Sri Lankan contact Malay (SLM) and Portuguese (SLP) share sprachbund-discordant features, including pre-verbal functional markers for TMA and negation. Yet their negation strategies also differ. In SLM, negation morphology is a diagnostic for the finiteness status of verbs. SLP verbs are contrastively negated, based on aspectual (not tense/finiteness) contrasts, and participles in adjunct clauses have distinctive non-finite negation. SLM marks finiteness status on matrix auxiliaries in a biclausal periphrastic construction. In the SLP construction, auxiliary and participle cannot be independently negated and the auxiliary cannot be separated from the verbal complex, arguing against biclausal status. SLM marks negative polarity in quantified nominal constituents, but has no negative concord, whereas SLP has negative concord, but relatively little negative polarity marking.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The non-periphrastic verb forms and negation
- 3.The periphrastic perfect construction and negation
- 4.The finiteness contrast in negation increases the visibility of event structure contrasts
- 5.Negative polarity and negative concord
- 6.Conclusion
Abbreviation Notes References - Author query
References (20)
Arkadiev, P. 2015. Perfect and negation: Evidence from Lithuanian and sundry languages. Paper presented at The Perfect: variation workshop – Synchrony, diachrony & acquisition, Trondheim, 5–7 November.
Bakker, P. 2000. Convergence intertwining: An alternative way towards the genesis of mixed languages. In Languages in Contact, D. G. Gilbers, J. A. Nerbonne & J. Schaeken (eds), 29–35. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
2006. The Sri Lanka Sprachbund: The newcomers Portuguese and Malay. In Linguistic Areas: Convergence in Historical and Typological Perspective, Y. Matras, A. McMahon & N. Vincent (eds), 135–159. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
den Besten, H. 2000. The slaves' languages in the Dutch Cape Colony and Afrikaans vir. Linguistics 38–5: 949–971.
Haspelmath, M. 1989. From purposive to infinitive: A universal path of grammaticization. Folia Linguistica Historica X(1–2): 287–310.
Mitchell, E. 1991. Evidence from Finnish for Pollock's Theory of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 22(2): 373–379.
2006. The morpho-syntax of negation and the positions of NegP in the Finno-Ugric languages. Lingua 116(3): 228–244.
Mohanan, T. & Mohanan, K. P. 2009. Multiple tenses in the Malayalam verb. In The Nature of the Word: Studies in Honor of Paul Kiparsky, K. Hanson & S. Inkelas (eds), 359–385. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Nordhoff, S. 2009. A Grammar of Upcountry Sri Lanka Malay. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Slomanson, P. 2008. The perfect construction and complexity drift in Sri Lankan Malay. Lingua 118(10): 1640–1655.
2009. Morphological finiteness as increased complexity in negation systems. In Complex Processes in New Languages [Creole Language Library 35], E. Aboh & N. Smith (eds), 243–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2011. Dravidian features in the Sri Lankan Malay verb. In Creoles, their Substrates, and Language Typology [Typological Studies in Language 95], C. Lefebvre (ed) 383–409. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2013a. Known, inferable, and discoverable in Sri Lankan Malay research. In Extreme Language Contact: The Case of Sri Lanka Malay, S. Nordhoff (ed) 85–119. Amsterdam: Brill.
2013b. Sri Lankan Malay. In The Survey of Pidgin & Creole Languages, Vol. III: Contact languages based on languages from Africa, Asia, Australia, and the Americas, S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (eds), 77–85. Oxford: OUP.
2016a. New information structuring processes and morphosyntactic change. In Information Structure and Spoken Language in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, M. M. J. Fernandez-Vest & R. D. Van Valin, Jr. (eds), 305–324. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2016b. Pragmatic accommodation as a catalyst for the development of (non-)finiteness. The Linguistic Review 33(3): 365–396.
2018. The development of infinitival complementation with or without language contact. In Changing Structures: Studies in constructions and complementation [Studies in Language Companion Series 195] M. Kaunisto, M. Höglund & P. Rickman (eds), 197–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.