Cover not available

Review published In: Metaphor Variation in Englishes around the World
Edited by Marcus Callies and Alexander Onysko
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 4:1] 2017
► pp. 159–163

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale. Constructionalization and constructional changes

Reviewed by
 | Guizhou Normal University, China
 | Guizhou Normal University, China
Published online: 16 October 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.4.1.08yan
References (7)
References
Bybee, J. L. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2007). Construction grammar. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp.463–508). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 71, 219–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Constructionist approaches. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 15–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (2014). Toward a constructional framework for research on language. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 3–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wen, X. Yang, K. & Kuang, F. T. (2014). Cognitive linguistics: Retrospect and prospect. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 1(2), 155–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue