Article published In: Metaphor Variation in Englishes around the World
Edited by Marcus Callies and Alexander Onysko
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 4:1] 2017
► pp. 131–158
Metaphors of womanhood in the literary works of contemporary Indian writers
Published online: 16 October 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.4.1.07ahu
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.4.1.07ahu
Abstract
This study examines the notion of womanhood in the literary works of contemporary Indian authors by analyzing conceptual metaphors of womanhood. More specifically, the data collected in this study are metaphorical expressions (MEs) from nine fictional works set in India’s three main ethnically and linguistically diverse regions occupied by three linguistic groups, namely, the Indo-Aryan, the Dravidian, and the Tibeto-Burmese. The identification of MEs follows the Metaphor Identification Procedure VU University Amsterdam (MIPVU; Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, B. J., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010a). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ). The analysis focuses on cross-cultural variation in conceptual metaphor, applying Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT; Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.) and the cognitive dimension of socio-cultural diversity proposed by Kövecses (2008). Through the analysis of conceptual metaphor, the paper provides insights into the current social context regarding the status and roles of women in India.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Selection of literary works
- 3.2Identification of metaphorical linguistic expressions
- 3.3Analysis of conceptual metaphors of womanhood
- 3.3.1Conceptual Metaphor Theory
- 3.3.2Cognitive dimensions of socio-cultural variation
- 4.Results
- 4.1Source domains used to conceptualize womanhood
- 4.2Dimensions of metaphor variation
- 4.2.1Generic-level metaphor functioning at a culture-specific level
- 4.2.2Variation in the use of source and target domain
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
References
References (46)
Ali, N. (Ed.). (2007). Natural resource management and sustainable development in northeast India. New Delhi: Mittal Publications.
Bhasin, M. K. (2006). Genetics of castes and tribes of India. International Journal of Human Genetics, 6(3), 233–274.
(2007). Indian anthropology: Racial, ethnic, religious and linguistic elements in Indian population. Retrieved from [URL].
Buchowski, M. (1996). Metaphor, metonymy, and cross-cultural translation. Semiotica, 110(3–4), 301–314.
Buongpui, R. L (2013). Gender relations and the web of traditions in Northeast India. The NEHU Journal, XI(2), 73–81.
Census 2011, Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner. (2001). Family-wise grouping of the 122 Scheduled and Non-Scheduled Languages. Retrieved May 6, 2016, from [URL]
Chin, J. K. (2009). Are women nothing more than their body parts? Obscene and indecent metaphors used to describe women in a Hong Kong magazine. LCOM Papers, 21, 17–30.
Emanatian, M. (1995). Metaphor and the expression of emotion: The value of cross-cultural perspectives. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 101, 163–182.
Fernandez, J. W. (Ed.).(1991). Beyond metaphor. The theory of tropes in anthropology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grady, J. (2007).
Metaphor
. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 188–233). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hines, C. (1994). Let me call you sweetheart: The WOMAN AS DESSERT metaphor. In M. Bucholtz, A. C. Liang, L. A. Sutton & C. Hines (Eds.), Cultural performances, proceedings of the third women and language conference (pp. 8–10). University of California, Berkeley.
(1999). Foxy chicks and Playboy bunnies: A case study in metaphorical lexicalization. In K. Misako., H. Sinha & C. W. Sherman (Eds.), Cultural, typological and psychological perspectives on Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 9–23). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. .
Kachru, Braj B. (1994).
English in South Asia
. In R. Burchfield (Ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol. V1: English in Britain and overseas. Origin and development (pp. 497–553). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kilyeni, A. & Silaski, N. (2015). Beauty and the beast from a cognitive linguistic perspective: Animal metaphors for women in Serbian and Romanian. Gender Studies, 13(1), 163–178.
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
(2008). Universality and variation in the use of metaphor. In N. L. Johannesson & D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals (pp.51–74). Stockholm: Department of English, Stockholm University.
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lixia, W. & Eng, B. W. (2012). A corpus-based study on snake metaphors in Mandarin Chinese and British English. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 311–324.
Majumder, P. P. (2001). Ethnic populations of India as seen from an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Biosciences, 26(4), 533–545.
Mee, J. (2003). After midnight, the novel in the 1980s and 1990s. In A. K. Mehrotra (Ed.), An illustrated history of Indian literature in English (pp. 318–337). London: C. Hurst & Co. Ltd.
Nicosia, B. F., & Padua, S. (2003). Masculinist metaphors, feminist research. Metaphorik.de 51, 6–25.
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse, Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.
Rivas, G. C. (2011). Women as food in Hispanic cultural metaphors, MP: An online feminist journal, 3(3), 6–20.
Rodriguez, I. L. (2009). Of women, bitches, chickens and vixens: Animal metaphors for women in English and Spanish. Culture, Language and Representation, 71, 77–100.
Sacristan, V. M., & Olivera, F. A. (2006). Towards a critical cognitive pragmatic approach to gender metaphors in advertising English. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(11), 1982–2002.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, B. J., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010a). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Steen, G. J., Dorst. A. G., Kaal, A., Herrmann, B. J., & Krennmayr, T. (2010b). Metaphor in usage. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 765–796.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Zadobrivscaia, O. F. & V. G. Egorova
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
