Cover not available

Article published In: Metaphor Variation in Englishes around the World
Edited by Marcus Callies and Alexander Onysko
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 4:1] 2017
► pp. 36–62

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Metaphor variation of spatial conceptualizations in Irish English

A methodological design

 | Trinity College Dublin (Ireland)
Published online: 16 October 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.4.1.03luc
Abstract
The current paper offers a novel methodological approach to gathering rich spatial data from Irish English speakers, showing variation in the cognition of physical and conceptual space. A mixed method study was conducted to gather conceptual and sociolinguistic data. This includes the first part of the data gathering: a structured interview, focusing on geographic aspects of the town and two wayfinding exercises. I then describe the second part of the study: twenty cloze procedure questions relating to a written example, followed by questions relating to seventeen hand-drawn images. I take as a baseline the instruments used by, inter alia, Levinson, S., & Wilkins, D. (Eds.). (2006a). Grammars of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar and apply them to a within-culture study. I conclude this paper by discussing replicability and future studies. While Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) offers researchers a model to connect physical and conceptual elements of space, we have not seen a large-scale study of how CMT affects the language of space in varieties of English.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Different types of spatial language
    • 2.2Conceptual Metaphor Theory
    • 2.3Variation in metaphor
    • 2.4How languages vary
      • 2.4.1Cross-linguistic studies of spatial reference
      • 2.4.2Sociolinguistic variation in Irish English
      • 2.4.3Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Variation in understanding
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Sociolinguistic methods
    • 3.2Cross-linguistic spatial methods
    • 3.3Cognitive mapping methods
    • 3.4The current study
      • 3.4.1Recruitment
      • 3.4.2Participants
      • 3.4.3Transcription
      • 3.4.4Coding
      • 3.4.5Questionnaire
  • 4.Results and analysis
    • 4.1Case studies
    • 4.2Interviews
      • 4.2.1Location metaphors
    • 4.3Questionnaires
      • 4.3.1Location metaphor summary
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (39)
References
Berman, R., & Slobin, D. (1994). Relating events in narrative: a crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1996). The origins of children’s spatial semantic categories: Cognitive versus linguistic determinants. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 145–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, L. A., & Hill, P. L. (2007). Experimental methods for studying language and space. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson, & M. J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. 250–276). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cassidy, F. G. (1977). Notes on nicknames for places in the United States. American Speech, 521, 19–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. (2002). Studying language variation: An informal epistemology. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 3–14). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, P. (2010). Introduction. In V. Evans & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions (pp. 1–18). London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Central Statistics Office of Ireland. (2012). Census 2011 population classified by area. Dublin: Stationary Office. [URL] (Last accessed on May 12 2016)
Coventry, K. R., & Prat-Sala, M. (2001). Object-specific function, geometry and the comprehension of “in” and “on”. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 131, 509–528. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filppula, M. (1991). Urban and rural varieties of Hiberno-English. In J. Cheshire (Ed.), English around the world: Sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 51–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D., Kristiansen, G., & Peirsman, Y. (Eds.). (2010a.). Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010b). Introduction. In D. Geeraerts, G. Kristiansen, & Y. Peirsman (Eds.), Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics (pp. 1–20). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haviland, J. B. (1998). Guugu Yimithirr Cardinal Directions. Ethos, 261, 25–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hickey, R. (2005). Dublin English: Evolution and change. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Irish English: History and present-day forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerswill, P., & Williams, A. (2000). Creating a new town koiné – Children and language change in Milton Keynes. Language in Society, 291, 65–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kitchin, R., & Blades, M. (2002). The cognition of geographic space. London: I.B. Tauris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Language, mind, and culture: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kortmann, B., & Upton, C. (Eds.). (2008). Varieties of English. Volume 1: The British Isles. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kristiansen, G., & Dirven, R. (Eds.). (2008a). Cognitive sociolinguistics. Language variation, cultural models, social systems. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008b). Introduction: Cognitive sociolinguistics: Rationale, methods and scope. In G. Kristiansen & R. Dirven (Eds.), Cognitive sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems (pp. 1–20). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroeger, P. R. (2005). Analyzing grammar: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Principles of linguistic change. Volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S., Meira, S., & The Language and Cognition Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. (2003). 'Natural concepts' in the spatial topological domain – Adpositional meanings in crosslinguistic perspective: An exercise in semantic typology. Language, 791, 485–516. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S., & Wilkins, D. (Eds.). (2006a). Grammars of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006b). The background to the study of language and space. In S. Levinson & D. Wilkins (Eds.), Grammars of space (pp. 1–23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006c). Patterns in the data: towards a semantic typology of spatial description. In S. Levinson & D. Wilkins (Eds.), Grammars of space (pp. 512–552). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lucek, S. (2017). UP town and DOWN town: The INs and OUTs of how Navan residents conceptualise the town where they live. English Language Research, 21, 106–125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Numbers [Computer software]. (2015).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pages [Computer software]. (2015).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., and Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, J. A. (2010). Awesome insights into semantic variation. In D. Geeraerts, G. Kristiansen & Y. Peirsman (Eds.), Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics (pp. 85–110). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, N. (2007). Sociolinguistic fieldwork. In R. Bayley & C. Lucas (Eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Theories, methods, and applications (pp. 165–189). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Solheim, R. (2009). Dialect development in a melting pot: The formation of a new culture and a new dialect in the industrial town of Høyanger. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 321, 191–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. (2006). Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wavelab LE 7 [Computer software]. (2011).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolf, H. -G., & Polzenhagen, F. (2009). World Englishes. A cognitive sociolinguistic approach. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Peters, Arne
2025. Irish English, Cultural Conceptualizations in. In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of World Englishes, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Skichko, Anastasiia S., Sandrine Peraldi & Stephen Lucek
2023. “PEOPLE MATTER. FREEDOM MATTERS. PEACE MATTERS”: CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR ANALYSIS OF VOLODYMYR ZELENSKYY’S SPEECHES. Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philology 2:26/2 ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Zadobrivscaia, O. F. & V. G. Egorova
2021. Categorization of Political Terms in the Image and Likeness of the Container. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University 23:3 ► pp. 773 ff. DOI logo
Lemghari, El Mustapha
2019. A metaphor-based account of semantic relations among proverbs. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:1 ► pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2025. Cultural models of gender and homosexuality in Indian and Nigerian English [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 17], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue