Cover not available

Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 3:2 (2016) ► pp.233–258

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Chinese as satellite-framed

A constructional-cognitive interpretation

 | Department of English, University of Macau
Published online: 3 March 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.3.2.03fon
This article defends the position taken by Talmy that Mandarin Chinese is satellite-framed, and thus argues against Slobin and Chen and Guo that Mandarin is ‘equipollently-framed’. The approach we take is constructional and cognitive in that we draw insights from Construction Grammar and Cognitive Grammar, though it is not restricted to either of them. A more unconventional view of the clause structure in Chinese is first presented, examining the so-called ‘complex sentences’ from a cognitive perspective. The consequence of this view is that the notion of ‘equipollent-framed language’ for Chinese can be abandoned and thus tidying up Talmy’s original typology. It is further argued that the constructional-cognitive view of Chinese captures the structural intuitions more appropriately than a traditional generative account, and that the motion-directional structure in Chinese has been constructionalized to the extent that individual verbs in the construction merge but produce a structure with more than their total properties.
References (32)
陆镜光 (2006). 论小句在汉语语法中的地位.《汉语学报》, 151, 2–14. [Luke, K.K. (2006). On the grammatical status of a clause in Chinese. HanyuXuebao , 151, 2–14].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
邓思颖. (2005). 从生成语法学观点看 “小句中枢说”. <<汉语学>>, 11, 56–63. [Tang, S-W. (2005). A generative grammarian perspective on “a clause as a center”. Hanyu Xuebao, 1, 56–63.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
刑福义 (1998). 汉语语法学.东北师范大学出版社[Xing, F. (1998). Chinese grammar . Changchun: Northeast Normal University Press].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, H.C. (2003). A constructional approach to resultatives. California: Stanford University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, Y.R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. University of California: Berkeley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, L., & Guo, J. (2009). Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equipollently-framed language. Journal of Pragmatics, 411, 1749–1766. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic categories and grammatical relations. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67(3), 547–619. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1982). Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Eds.), Linguistics in the Morning calm (pp. 111–138). Seoul: HanshinGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C., & Aitkens, B. (1992). Toward a frame-based lexicon. In A. Lehrer & E. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, fields and contrasts (pp. 75–102). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fong, R. (2015). A constructional-cognitive analysis of Chinese directionals. Cognitive Semantics, 1(1), 104–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. (2009). Multiple routes to clause-union: The diachrony of complex verb phrases. In T. Givón & M. Shibatani (Eds.), Syntactic complexity (pp. 81–118). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.E. (1995). Constructions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). Constructions at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (1985). Natural syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C-T.J., Li, A., & Li, Y. (2009). The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G.K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. I1). California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. II1). California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). Ten lectures on cognitive grammar. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008).Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (2005). Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum. S., Leech, G., & Svarvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B. (2001). An event structure account of English resultatives. Language, 771, 766–797. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology & the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative (Vol. 21, pp. 219–257). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, S-W. (2010). Formal Chinese syntax. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Towards a cognitive semantics (Vol. 21). Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Main verb properties. Revised version. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Ten lectures on cognitive semantics. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E.C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Fong, Ronald
2017. Chinese Motion-Directional Construction: A Conceptual and Cognitive Analysis. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 38:2 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue