Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 12:2 (2025) ► pp.322–345
Various ways of supporting society
Decoding the tax is support metaphor in Japanese children’s multimodal expressions
Published online: 10 November 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.24002.yua
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.24002.yua
Abstract
This study sheds light on how Japanese children conceptualize taxation through creative metaphors, offering
insights into their cognitive development and societal understanding. Specifically, the research investigates the most prevalent
metaphor, tax is support, identified through the analysis of 712 postcards collected from a prefecture-wide children’s
competition in Akita, Japan. The study addresses two core questions: (i) How do Japanese children conceptualize the metaphor of
tax is support? (ii) What does the metaphor reveal about their understanding of tax and the nature of cognitive
effort involved in metaphor interpretation? Drawing on multimodal metaphor analysis (Forceville, C. J., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Introduction. In C. J. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 3–18). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ), the study examines how children’s visual and verbal representations
complement each other, reflecting deeper conceptual structures. The analysis is also framed by L. S. Vygotsky’s sociocultural
theory (Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.; Rieber, R. W., & Carton, A. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Problems of general psychology, including the volume thinking and speech. New York: Springer New York.), which emphasizes the role of social interaction and cultural tools in shaping cognitive development.
Through these lenses, the study explores how Japanese children aged 11 to 12 internalize complex societal concepts like taxation
and transform them into meaningful metaphors, reflecting both personal interpretation and the sociocultural values embedded in the
competition context.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical framework
- 3.The Postcard Contest on Tax and genre convention
- 4.Methodology and results
- 5.support metaphors in action
- 5.1support as a person
- 5.2support as the foundation
- 5.3support as a scale
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (41)
Bateman, J. A. (2014). Text and image: A critical introduction to the visual-verbal divide. London: Routledge.
Bolognesi, M. (2018). Review of Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. Language and Cognition, 10(3), 552–559.
Bounegru, L., & Forceville, C. (2011). Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication, 10(2), 209–229.
Caballero, R. (2016). Genre and metaphor: Use and variation across usage events. In E. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 193–205). London: Routledge.
Carriedo, N., Corral, A., Montoro, P. R., Herrero, L., Ballestrino, P., & Sebastián, I. (2016). The development of metaphor comprehension and its relationship with relational verbal reasoning and executive function. PLOS ONE, 11(3), Article e0150289.
Chesley, G. L., Gillett, D. A., & Wagner, W. G. (2008). Verbal and nonverbal metaphor with children in counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 86(4), 399–411.
Deckert, M., Schmoeger, M., Schaunig-Busch, I., & Willinger, U. (2019). Metaphor processing in middle childhood and at the transition to early adolescence: The role of chronological age, mental age, and verbal intelligence. Journal of Child Language, 46(2), 334–367.
Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Kent, G. (1996). Visual signals and the communication abilities of children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37(8), 949–959.
El Refaie, E. (2003). Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication, 2(1), 75–95.
Epstein, R. L., & Gamlin, P. J. (1994). Young children’s comprehension of simple and complex metaphors presented in pictures and words. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9(3), 179–191.
Forceville, C. J., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Introduction. In C. J. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 3–18). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Goldin-Meadow, S., Alibali, M. W., & Church, R. B. (1993). Transitions in concept acquisition: Using the hand to read the mind. Psychological Review, 100(2), 279–297.
Goodrich Smith, W., & Hudson Kam, C. L. (2015). Children’s use of gesture in ambiguous pronoun interpretation. Journal of Child Language, 42(3), 591–617.
Kageyama, T., & Kishimoto, H. (2016). Handbook of Japanese lexicon and word formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kogan, N., & Chadrow, M. (1986). Children’s comprehension of metaphor in the pictorial and verbal modality. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9(3), 285–295.
Kogan, N., Connor, K., Gross, A., & Fava, D. (1980). Understanding visual metaphor: Developmental and individual differences. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 45(1), 1–78.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 1(1), 70–81.
Littlemore, J. (2017). Metaphor use in educational contexts: Functions and variations. in E. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 285–295). London: Routledge.
Özçalişkan, Ş. (2005). On learning to draw the distinction between physical and metaphorical motion: Is metaphor an early emerging cognitive and linguistic capacity?. Journal of Child Language, 32(2), 291–318.
Pérez Sobrino, P. (2017). Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pouscoulous, N. (2011). Metaphor: For adults only?. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 25(1), 51–79.
Rieber, R. W., & Carton, A. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Problems of general psychology, including the volume thinking and speech. New York: Springer New York.
Rocci, A., Mazzali-Lurati, S., & Pollaroli, C. (2018). The argumentative and rhetorical function of multimodal metonymy. Semiotica, 2018(220), 123–153.
Sasaki, K. (2020). The current situation and issues of taxpayer education in Japan. International E-Journal of Advances in Education, VI(16), 14–22.
Siltanen, S. A. (1989). Effects of three levels of context on children’s metaphor comprehension. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 150(2), 197–215.
Siqueira, M., & Gibbs, R. (2007). Children’s acquisition of primary metaphors: A crosslinguistic study. Organon, 21(43), 161–179.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2013). Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLOS ONE, 8(1), Article e52961.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Williams, J. L. (2015). Metaphorical conceptualizations and classroom practices of instructors teaching an accelerated postsecondary developmental literacy course. In W. Wan & G. Low (Eds.), Metaphor in language, cognition, and communication: Vol. 3: Elicited metaphor analysis in educational discourse (pp. 239–264). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Winner, E. (1997). The point of words: Children’s understanding of metaphor and irony. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Yuan, X. (2023). Metaphors and metonymies in the multimodal discourse of whaling: A cross genre comparative study. Metaphor and the Social World, 13(2), 293–315.
(in press). Tiny canvases, big tales: Deciphering the concept of tax through Japanese children’s postcard drawings. Visual Communication.
Zhang, C., & Forceville, C. (2020). Metaphor and metonymy in Chinese and American political cartoons (2018–2019) about the Sino-US trade conflict. Pragmatics & Cognition, 27(2), 474–499.
