Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 12:2 (2025) ► pp.377–405
Can frame-semantic congruence enhance incidental memory for food labels?
Published online: 10 November 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.23018.joh
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.23018.joh
Abstract
Although it is well-documented in the literature that semantic
congruence positively impacts memory in general and incidental memory in
particular, it is unknown whether this effect extends to frame-semantic
congruence. The primary objective of this study was to reveal whether
frame-semantic congruence has a positive effect on incidental memory. This was
an experimental study using a timed judgment task and a subsequent free recall
task. 248 participants judged 30 food labels — of which 2 were
frame-semantically congruent and 2 were frame-semantically incongruent, and the
rest were distractors — with regard to their realness as quickly as possible.
Next, participants listed as many of the items from the timed judgment task as
possible in a free recall task. A Poisson mixed model showed no significant
effects of frame-semantic (in)congruence on memorability of food labels.
However, a McNemar’s test showed a significant difference between the two
frame-semantically congruent food labels: crispy chips
significantly outperformed crunchy lettuce, a pattern which was
also observed in the reaction times. Frame-semantically congruent food labels
may enhance incidental memory when applied to some but not all types of foods.
However, this remains to be corroborated by further studies.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Methods
- 2.1Participants
- 2.2Tasks
- 2.2.1Timed judgment task
- 2.2.1.1Practice round
- 2.2.1.2Real experiment
- 2.2.2Free recall task
- 2.2.1Timed judgment task
- 2.3Procedure
- 2.4Data analysis
- 3.Results
- 3.1Overall recall
- 3.2Recall for congruent stimuli
- 3.3Overall reaction time
- 3.4Reaction time for congruent stimuli
- 4.Discussion
- 4.1Summary and interpretations
- 4.2Implications
- 4.3Recommendations for future research
- 4.4Limitations
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (74)
Ackermann, L. K. (2023). Bagger
or bär? The influence of individual interests on early word
learning. Doctoral dissertation. Gottingen: Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. [URL]
Alejandro, R. J., Packard, P. A., Steiger, T. K., Fuentemilla, L., & Bunzeck, N. (2021). Semantic
congruence drives long-term memory and similarly affects neural retrieval
dynamics in young and older adults. Frontiers
in Aging
Neuroscience, 131, Article
683908.
Alkasasbeh, A. A., Spyridonis, F., & Ghinea, G. (2021). When
scents help me remember my password. ACM
Transactions on Applied
Perception, 18(3), Article
16.
Allen, M. (2016). The
influence of phonetic symbolism on memory for
advertisements. Master’s
thesis. Cambridge: Harvard College. [URL]
Barton, J. J. S., Hanif, H. M., Björnström, L. E., & Hills, C. (2014). The
word-length effect in reading: A
review. Cognitive
Neuropsychology, 31(5–6), 378–412.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting
linear mixed-effects models using
lme4. Journal of Statistical
Software, 67(1), 1–48.
Bian, L., & Markman, E. M. (2020). Why
do we eat cereal but not lamb chops at breakfast? Investigating Americans’
beliefs about breakfast
foods. Appetite, 1441, Article
104458.
Boas, H. C., Dux, R., & Ziem, A. (2016). Frames
and constructions in an online learner’s dictionary of
German. In S. De Knop & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied
construction
grammar (pp. 303–326). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bodoh-Creed, A. L. (2020). Mood,
memory, and the evaluation of asset
prices. Review of
Finance, 24(1), 227–262.
Boltz, M. G., Mangigian, G. M., & Allen, M. B. (2016). Phonetic
symbolism and memory for
advertisements. Applied Cognitive
Psychology, 30(6), 1088–1092.
Burns, M. K. (1999). Test-retest
reliability of individual student acquisition and retention rates as
measured by instructional assessment. Doctoral
dissertation. Berrien Springs: Andrews University. [URL]
Campo, R., Reinoso-Carvalho, F., & Rosato, P. (2021). Wine
experiences: A review from a multisensory
perspective. Applied
Sciences, 11(10), Article
4488.
Cancino, M. (2021). Incidental
vocabulary learning and retention of EFL learners: To what extent is topic
interest a factor?. Revista Española de
Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 34(1), 31–52.
(2023). Topic
interest increases L2 incidental vocabulary learning and effective
dictionary look-up behaviour. Learning and
Motivation, 831, Article
101920.
Childers, T. L., & Jass, J. (2002). All
dressed up with something to say: Effects of typeface semantic associations
on brand perceptions and consumer
memory. Journal of Consumer
Psychology, 12(2), 93–106.
Coltheart, V., Mondy, S., Dux, P. E., & Stephenson, L. (2004). Effects
of orthographic and phonological word length on memory for lists shown at
RSVP and STM rates. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 30(4), 815–826.
Common European Framework of
Reference for Languages
(CEFR). (n.d.). The CEFR
levels. Council of Europe. [URL]
Cortese, M. J., Khanna, M. M., & Von Nordheim, D. (2019). Incidental
memory for colour word associates processed in colour naming and reading
aloud tasks: Is a blue ocean more memorable than a yellow
one?. Memory, 27(7), 924–930.
Diederich, C. (2015). Sensory
adjectives in the discourse of food: A frame-semantic approach to language
and
perception. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Endo, Y. A. (2010). The
effects of topic interest on the vocabulary retention in third grade
students with and without learning
disabilities. Doctoral
dissertation. New York: Columbia University. [URL]
Fillmore, C. J. (1994). Lexicography
and ethnographic semantics. Supplement to the
Proceedings of the 6th EURALEX International
Congress, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. [URL]
(2006). Frame
semantics. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive
linguistics: Basic
readings (pp. 373–400). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fritz, T. H., Schütte, F., Steixner, A., Contier, O., Obrig, H., & Villringer, A. (2019). Musical
meaning modulates word acquisition. Brain and
Language, 1901, 10–15.
Ganushchak, L. Y., Krott, A., Frisson, S., & Meyer, A. S. (2013). Processing
words and Short Message Service shortcuts in sentential contexts: An eye
movement study. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 34(1), 163–179.
Gearhardt, A. N., Davis, C., Kuschner, R., & Brownell, K. D. (2011). The
addiction potential of hyperpalatable
foods. Current Drug Abuse
Reviews, 4(3), 140–145.
Goldberg, L. S. (2017). Understanding
self-control, motivation, and attention in the context of eating
behavior. Master’s
thesis. Williamsburg: College of William and Mary. [URL]
Gong, S.-P., & Ahrens, K. (2007). Processing
conceptual metaphors in on-going
discourse. Metaphor and
Symbol, 22(4), 313–330.
Heiltjes, S. (2014). Touching
brands: The effects of multisensory packaging design on brand and product
perception and evaluation. Master’s
thesis. Enschede: University of Twente. [URL]
Hervet, G., Guérard, K., Tremblay, S., & Chtourou, M. S. (2010). Is
banner blindness genuine? Eye tracking internet text
advertising. Applied Cognitive
Psychology, 25(5), 708–716.
Höltje, G., Lubahn, B., & Mecklinger, A. (2019). The
congruent, the incongruent, and the unexpected: Event-related potentials
unveil the processes involved in schematic
encoding. Neuropsychologia, 1311, 285–293.
Hussain, S. (2018). Brand
image and customer loyalty through sensory marketing strategies — A study on
international fast food chain
restaurants. International Journal of
Management
Studies, V[2(7)], 32.
Johnson, T. M. (2025). The
effects of frame-semantically (in)congruent food labels on taste in
non-native English
speakers. Lingua, 3151, Article
103875.
Johnson, T. M., & Pfenninger, S. E. (2021). Tasty
words: Using frame semantics to enhance consumer liking of potato chips and
apples. International Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 31(1), 79–94.
Joshi, S., Domb, M., Chanda, B., & Bais, A. (2022). Evaluating
the impact of storytelling ads on consumer purchase
intention. Journal of Service Science and
Management, 15(1), 10–22.
Jun, Y., & Lee, H. (2022). A
sound brand identity design: The interplay between sound symbolism and
typography on brand attitude and
memory. Journal of Retailing and Consumer
Services, 641, Article
102724.
Kaan, J., van Kleef, E., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2023). Desire
dynamics over repeated intake of a hyper-palatable
food. SSRN Electronic
Journal.
Kachoub, B., & Hilgendorf, S. K. (2020). Quinlingualism
in the Maghreb? English use in Moroccan outdoor
advertising. English
Today, 36(2), 3–16.
Khurram, M., Qadeer, F., & Sheeraz, M. (2018). The
role of brand recall, brand recognition and price consciousness in
understanding actual purchase. Journal of
Research in Social
Sciences, 6(2), 219–241. [URL]
Kontaxopoulou, D., Beratis, I. N., Fragkiadaki, S., Pavlou, D., Andronas, N., Yannis, G., Economou, A., Papanicolaou, A. C., & Papageorgiou, S. G. (2018). Exploring
the profile of incidental memory in patients with amnestic mild cognitive
impairment and mild Alzheimer’s
disease. Journal of Alzheimer’s
Disease, 65(2), 617–627.
Körner, A., & Rummer, R. (2022). Valence
sound symbolism across language families: A comparison between Japanese and
German. Language and
Cognition, 15(2), 337–354.
Krishna, A., Lwin, M. O., & Morrin, M. (2010). Product
scent and memory. Journal of Consumer
Research, 37(1), 57–67.
Lee, S., & Baack, D. W. (2014). Meaning
or sound? The effects of brand name fluency on brand recall and willingness
to buy. Journal of Promotion
Management, 20(5), 521–536.
Lee, S. Y., & Shen, F. (2009). Joint
advertising and brand congruity: Effects on memory and
attitudes. Journal of Promotion
Management, 15(4), 484–498.
Li, H., & Lo, H.-Y. (2015). Do
you recognize its brand? The effectiveness of online in-stream video
advertisements. Journal of
Advertising, 44(3), 208–218.
Lim, Y. M., Yap, C. S., & Lau, T.-C. (2011). The
effectiveness of online advertising in purchase decision: Liking, recall and
click. Australian Journal of Basic and
Applied
Sciences, 5(9), 1517–1524.
Lochbuehler, K., Mercincavage, M., Tang, K. Z., Dana Tomlin, C., Cappella, J. N., & Strasser, A. A. (2017). Effect
of message congruency on attention and recall in pictorial health warning
labels. Tobacco
Control, 27(3), 266–271.
Lupyan, G., & Casasanto, D. (2015). Meaningless
words promote meaningful
categorization. Language and
Cognition, 7(2), 167–193.
Mackay, L. M. (2017). Image
memory for hyperpalatable foods in university aged
females. Master’s
thesis. Owensboro: Brescia University. [URL]
Micu, C. C., & Coulter, R. A. (2010). Advertising
in English in nonnative English-speaking markets: The effect of language and
self-referencing in advertising in Romania on ad
attitudes. Journal of East-West
Business, 16(1), 67–84.
Mike, J. N. (2007). Fast
food: One small bite for man, one giant problem for
mankind. Professionalization of Exercise
Physiology, 10(5).
Monteiro, C., Cannon, G., Lawrence, M., da Costa Louzada, M. L., & Machado, P. P. (2019). Ultra-processed
foods, diet quality and human
health. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Moorman, M., Neijens, P. C., & Smit, E. G. (2002). The
effects of magazine-induced psychological responses and thematic congruence
on memory and attitude toward the ad in a real-life
setting. Journal of
Advertising, 31(4), 27–40.
Nederstigt, U., & Hilberink-Schulpen, B. (2018). Advertising
in a foreign language or the consumers’ native
language?. Journal of International Consumer
Marketing, 30(1), 2–13.
North, A. C., Sheridan, L. P., & Areni, C. S. (2016). Music
congruity effects on product memory, perception, and
choice. Journal of
Retailing, 92(1), 83–95.
Packard, P. A., Rodríguez-Fornells, A., Bunzeck, N., Nicolás, B., de Diego-Balaguer, R., & Fuentemilla, L. (2017). Semantic
congruence accelerates the onset of the neural signals of successful memory
encoding. Journal of
Neuroscience, 37(2), 291–301.
Popkin, B. M., & Ng, S. W. (2022). The
nutrition transition to a stage of high obesity and noncommunicable disease
prevalence dominated by ultra-processed foods is not
inevitable. Obesity
Reviews, 23(1), Article
e13366.
Preziosi, M. A., & Coane, J. H. (2017). Remembering
that big things sound big: Sound symbolism and associative
memory. Cognitive Research: Principles and
Implications, 21, Article
10.
R Core
Team. (2021). R: A language and
environment for statistical
computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Rit, M. P., Croijmans, I., & Speed, L. J. (2019). High-tempo
and stinky: High arousal sound-odor congruence affects product
memory. Multisensory
Research, 32(4–5), 347–366.
Saint-Aubin, J., Beaudry, O., Guitard, D., Pâquet, M., & Guérard, K. (2020). The
word length effect in backward recall: The role of response
modality. Memory, 28(5), 692–700.
Schwarz, N., & Jalbert, M. (2020). When
(fake) news feels true: Intuitions of truth and the acceptance and
correction of
misinformation. In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffe, E. Newman & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The
psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting
misinformation (pp. 73–89). London: Routledge.
Sheinin, D. A., Varki, S., & Ashley, C. (2011). The
differential effect of ad novelty and message usefulness on brand
judgments. Journal of
Advertising, 40(3), 5–17.
Simola, J., Kivikangas, M., Kuisma, J., & Krause, C. M. (2013). Attention
and memory for newspaper advertisements: Effects of ad-editorial congruency
and location. Applied Cognitive
Psychology, 27(4), 429–442.
Sonbul, S. (2015). Fatal
mistake, awful mistake, or extreme mistake? Frequency effects on
off-line/on-line collocational
processing*. Bilingualism: Language and
Cognition, 18(3), 419–437.
Sonier, R.-P., Poirier, M., Guitard, D., & Saint-Aubin, J. (2020). A
round Bouba is easier to remember than a curved Kiki: Sound-symbolism can
support associative memory. Psychonomic
Bulletin &
Review, 271, 776–782.
Speed, L. J., & Majid, A. (2019). Linguistic
features of fragrances: The role of grammatical gender and gender
associations. Attention, Perception, &
Psychophysics, 811, 2063–2077.
Stice, E., Burger, K., & Yokum, S. (2013). Caloric
deprivation increases responsivity of attention and reward brain regions to
intake, anticipated intake, and images of palatable
foods. Neuroimage, 671, 322–330.
Tehan, G., & Tolan, G. A. (2007). Word
length effects in long-term memory. Journal
of Memory and
Language, 56(1), 35–48.
Winter, B. (2019). Sensory
linguistics: Language, perception, and
metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wirag, A., Li, Y., & Zhang, B. (2022). Applying
cognitive linguistics to foreign language teaching and learning: Addressing
current research challenges. Cognitive
Linguistic
Studies, 9(2), 185–201.
Wulff, S., Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. (2007). Brutal
Brits and persuasive Americans: Variety-specific meaning construction in the
into-causative. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects
of meaning
construction (pp. 265–281). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
