Cover not available

Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 12:2 (2025) ► pp.406–427

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Directionalities of synesthetic mappings in Korean collocations

ORCiD logo with link | Southwest University
Published online: 10 November 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.23002.jo
Abstract
This study examines linguistic synesthesia in collocations, which has rarely been addressed in the field. The synesthetic collocations data are gathered from Korean, which is a less studied language in the literature. The study addresses two issues. The first issue is whether the Korean collocation synesthesia has a particular directionality of synesthetic mappings, and whether it shares the same patterns with synesthetic metaphors in Indo-European languages. The second issue is whether linguistic synesthesia in Korean collocations shows a rule-based or frequency-based directionality if it has a certain transfer directional pattern. The results reveal that the Korean synesthetic collocations confirm the synesthetic mapping hierarchy analyzed based on Indo-European languages, assuming its cross-linguistic universality from the perspective of rule-based unidirectionality. In addition, the collocation synesthesia in Korean shows particularities. For instance, the visual domain is maximized as sources, but neither olfaction nor audition functions are identified as source. Finally, this study discusses sensory verbs containing auxiliary verbs, wherein grammaticalization is clearly identified for the Korean collocational synesthesia.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Sensory model
    • 3.2Structural level of the data
    • 3.3Selection criteria
    • 3.4Data collection
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1Synesthetic transfers in Korean collocations
    • 4.2Comparison with previous models
    • 4.3Korean sensory verbs containing auxiliary verbs
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (44)
References
Cacciari, C. (2008). Crossing the senses in metaphorical language. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 425–444). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chagnaa, A., Choe, H.-S., Ock, C.-Y., & Yoon, H.-M. (2007). On the evaluation of Korean WordNet. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on text, speech and dialogue, 123–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, I-H., Zhao, Q., Long, Y., Lu, Q., & Huang, C.-R. (2019). Mandarin Chinese modality exclusivity norms. PLoS ONE, 14(2), e0211336. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cho, S., & Whitman, J. (2020). Korean: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choi, K.-S., Bae, H.-S., Kang, W., Lee, J., Kim, E., Kim, H., Kim, D., Song, Y., & Shin, H. (2004). Korean-Chinese-Japanese multilingual Wordnet with shared semantic hierarchy. Proceedings of International conference on language resource and evaluation (LREC) 20041. 1131–1134.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chung, I. (1997). Synaesthetic transfer of Korean adjectives. Hyeondaemunbeobyeongu, 111, 163–180.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cytowic, R. E. (1989). Synesthesia: A union of the senses. New York: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Day, S. (1996). Synaesthesia and synaesthetic metaphors. Psyche, 2(32). 1–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dilshadovna, Y. G. (2020). Criteria for differing the types of auxiliary verbs in Korean. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(2), 206–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geurts, B. (2000). Explaining grammaticalization (the standard way). Linguistics, 38(4), 781–788. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsieh, S. C.-Y. (2011). Synaesthetic metaphors of television food commercial ads in Mandarin Chinese. TMUE Journal of Language and Literature, 1(6), 1–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jo, C. (2017). A corpus-based study on synesthesia in Korean ordinary language. PACLIC, 311, 249–254.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Synesthetic metaphors in Korean compounds. LREC 2018 Workshop LiNCR, 38–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). A corpus-based analysis of synesthetic metaphors in Korean. Linguistic Research, 36(3). 459–483. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kumcu, A. (2021). Linguistic synesthesia in Turkish: A corpus-based study of cross-modal directionality. Metaphor and Symbol, 36(4), 241–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, S. (2015). A study on synesthetic metaphor shown in Korean and Chinese advertisements from the viewpoint of cognitive linguistics. Chinese Literature, 681, 205–242.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, G. (1978). Synesthetic mapping of poetic diction. Korean Language and Literature, 781, 158–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rhee, S. (2018). Grammaticalization in Korean. Presented at SNU Workshop at the Nexus of Northeast Asian Area. Seoul, Korea, 26–27. October 2018.
Ronga, I., Bazzanella, C., Rossi, F., & Iannetti, G. (2012). Linguistic synaesthesia, perceptual synaesthesia, and the interaction between multiple sensory modalities. Pragmatics & Cognition, 20(1), 135–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shen, Y. (1997). Cognitive constraints on poetic figures. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(1), 33–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shen, Y., & Gil, D. (2008). Sweet Fragrances from Indonesia: A universal principle governing directionality in synaesthetic metaphors. In J. Auracher & W. van Peer (eds.), New beginnings in literary studies (pp.49–71). Berlin: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shen, Y., & Gadir, O. (2009). How to interpret the music of caressing: Target and source assignment in synaesthetic genitive constructions. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(2), 357–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shen, Y., & Aisenman, R. (2008). “Heard melodies are sweet, but those unheard are sweeter”: Synaesthetic metaphors and cognition. Language and Literature, 17(2), 107–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sohn, H.-M. (1973). Coherence in Korean auxiliary verb constructions. Language Research, 9(2). 239–251.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strik Lievers, F., & Winter, B. (2018). Sensory language across lexical categories. Lingua, 2041, 45–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strik Lievers, F., Xu, H., & Xu, G. (2013). A methodology for the extraction of lexicalized synaesthesia from corpora. Presented at International Congress of Linguists 19. Geneva, Switzerland, 21–27. July 2013.
Takada, M. (2008). Synesthetic metaphor: Perception, cognition, and language. Saarbrueken: VDM Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsur, R. (1992). Toward a theory of cognitive poetics. Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ullmann, S. (1957). The principles of semantics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, J. M. (1976). Synesthetic adjectives: A possible law of semantic change. Language, 521, 461–478. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, B. (2016). The sensory structure of the English lexicon. Doctoral dissertation Merced: University of California dissertation.
Wise, H. (1997). The vocabulary of modern French — Origins, structure and function. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoon, H. (1970). Structurality of synesthetic metaphors. Kugeogungmunhak, 471, 183–200.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, Ning. (2003). Synesthetic metaphor: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Literary Semantics, 32(1), 19–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhao, Q., & Huang, C.-R. (2015). A corpus-based study on synaesthetic adjectives in modern Chinese. Chinese Lexical Semantics LNAI, 93321, 535–542. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). A study on the mapping model and underlying mechanisms of synaesthetic metaphors in Mandarin. Yuyanjiaoxueyuyanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies], 1891, 44–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhao, Q., Huang, C.-R., & Ahrens, K. (2019). Directionality of linguistic synesthesia in Mandarin: A corpus-based study. Lingua, 2321, 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhao, Q., Huang, C.-R., & Long, Y. (2018). Synaesthesia in Chinese: A corpus-based study of gustatory adjectives in Mandarin. Linguistics, 56(5), 1167–1194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhong, Yin, Dong, S., & Huang, C.-R. (2018). Lexical differentiation in Mandarin Chinese sensory lexicon. Presented at The 10th European Association of Milan. Milan, Italy, 28–29. September 2018.
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue