Cover not available

Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 11:2 (2024) ► pp.402–439

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Exploring crosslinguistic influence on learning particles in phrasal verbs through a cognitive linguistic approach

ORCiD logo with link | Northumbria University
Published online: 10 October 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.22009.lin
Abstract
It is now well established that English phrasal verbs cause English as foreign language learners no small degree of confusion due to the semantic complexity. However, the influence of crosslinguistic transfer on learning phrasal verbs has remained unclear. There even has been little qualitative analysis of the crosslinguistic difference between literal and metaphorical meanings of particles. This paper proposes an instructional approach underpinned by metaphor and categorization in cognitive linguistics and highlights particles as a means of disentangling polysemous verb-particle constructions. Fifteen students from four universities in Taipei City and City of Newcastle upon Tyne participated in the study. Results of the qualitative data, i.e., discussion tasks, in-session tasks, and interviews, suggested that despite the difficulty of understanding some target items, the crosslinguistic similarities and differences generally aid the learning of the phrasal verbs via the proposed approach. Raising an awareness of crosslinguistic difference between metaphorical meanings of particles can be pedagogically useful.
Article outline
  • 1.Background
    • 1.1Challenges of phrasal verbs in EFL learning
    • 1.2Cognitive linguistic approach to teaching particles and phrasal verbs
    • 1.3Crosslinguistic influence
    • 1.4Objectives of the study
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Materials
    • 2.3Instruments
    • 2.4Procedure
    • 2.5Analysis
  • 3.Results and discussion
    • 3.1Research question one: Crosslinguistic similarities and differences
      • 3.1.1Similar L1/L2 use in spatial meanings of particles in phrasal verbs
      • 3.1.2Similar L1/L2 use in temporal/metaphorical meanings of particles in phrasal verbs
      • 3.1.3Different L1/L2 use in spatial meanings of particles in phrasal verbs
      • 3.1.4Different L1/L2 use in temporal/metaphorical meanings of particles in phrasal verbs
    • 3.2Research question two: L2 production
      • 3.2.1Phrasal verbs with spatial meanings
      • 3.2.2Phrasal verbs with temporal meanings
      • 3.2.3Phrasal verbs with metaphorical meanings
    • 3.3Research question three: Learners’ attitudes toward the cognitive linguistic approach intervention
  • 4.Conclusion and pedagogical implications
  • References
References (79)
References
Atkinson, D. (1987). The mother tongue in the classroom: A neglected resource?. ELT Journal, 41(4), 241–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). Teaching in the target language: A problem in the current orthodoxy. The Language Learning Journal, 8(1), 2–5. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F. (2000). Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 553–571. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary: Assessment and integration. Language Teaching, 46(2), 208–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., & Eyckmans, J. (2004). Etymological elaboration as a strategy for learning figurative idioms. In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection (pp. 53–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (Eds.). (2008). Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., & Stengers, H. (2008). A quantitative comparison of the English and Spanish repertoires of figurative idioms. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 355–374). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1971). The phrasal verb in English. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brugman, C. (1981). The story of over. Master’s thesis. Berkeley: University of California.
Butzkamm, W. (1998). Code-switching in a bilingual history lesson: The mother tongue as a conversational lubricant. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1(2), 81–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). We only learn language once. The role of the mother tongue in FL classrooms: Death of a dogma. The Language Learning Journal, 28(1), 29–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cervantes, I. M., & Gablasova, D. (2018). Phrasal verbs in L2 spoken English: The effect of L2 proficiency and L1 background. In V. Brezina & L. Flowerdew (Eds.), Learner corpus research: New perspectives and applications (pp. 28–46). London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2002). Second language figurative proficiency: A comparative study of Malay and English. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 104–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, V. (2001). Using the first language in the classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(3), 402–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooper, T. C. (1999). Processing of idioms by L2 learners of English. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 233–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cornell, A. (1999). Idioms: An approach to identifying major pitfalls for learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 37(1), 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oak: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dagut, M., & Laufer, B. (1985). Avoidance of phrasal verbs – A case for contrastive analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(1), 73–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deignan, A., Gabryś, D., & Solska, A. (1997). Teaching English metaphors using cross-linguistic awareness-raising activities. ELT Journal, 51(4), 352–360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dirven, R. (2001). English phrasal verbs: Theory and didactic application. In M. Pütz, S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics II: Language pedagogy (pp. 3–28). Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dirven, R., & Verspoor, M. (Eds.). (2004). Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duff, P. (2018). Case study research in applied linguistics. New York & London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
El-Dakhs, D. A. S., Sonbul, S., & Alwazzan, R. (2021). Learning phrasal verbs in the EFL classroom: The effect of prior vocabulary knowledge and opacity. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 60(4), 1253–1291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elgort, I. (2017). Incorrect inferences and contextual word learning in English as a second language. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 1(1), 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gairns, R., & Redman, S. (2011). Idioms and phrasal verbs. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2007). Pointing out frequent phrasal verbs: A corpus-based analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 339–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garnier, M., & Schmitt, N. (2015). The PHaVE List: A pedagogical list of phrasal verbs and their most frequent meaning senses. Language Teaching Research, 19(6), 645–666. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gu, P. Y. (2003). Vocabulary learning in a second language: Person, task, context and strategies. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 7(2), 1–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holme, R. (2004). Mind, metaphor and language teaching. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Cognitive linguistics and language teaching. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Cognitive linguistics and the second language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 46(1), 6–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H., & Marchena, E. (1989). Avoidance: Grammatical or semantic causes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(3), 241–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Irujo, S. (1986). A piece of cake: Learning and teaching idioms. ELT Journal, 40(3), 236–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Szabó, P. (1996). Idioms: A view from cognitive semantics. Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 326–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 440–464. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kurtyka, A. (2001). Teaching English phrasal verbs: A cognitive approach. In M. Pütz, S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics II: Language pedagogy (pp. 29–54). Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Metaphors we live by. London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar (vol. I): Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Eliasson, S. (1993). What causes avoidance in L2 learning: L1-L2 difference, L1-L2 similarity, or L2 complexity?. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(1), 35–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Girsai, N. (2008). Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 694–716. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leow, R. P. (2001). Do learners notice enhanced forms while interacting with the L2?: An online and offline study of the role of written input enhancement in L2 reading. Hispania, 84(3), 496–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, L., & Xu, H. (2015). Using an online dictionary for identifying the meanings of verb phrases by Chinese EFL learners. Lexikos, 251, 191–209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liao, Y., & Fukuya, Y. J. (2004). Avoidance of phrasal verbs: The case of Chinese learners of English. Language Learning, 54(2), 193–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindstromberg, S. (1996). Prepositions: Meaning and method. ELT Journal, 50(3), 225–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2003). The communicative effectiveness of different types of communication strategy. System, 31(3), 331–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Applying cognitive linguistics to second language learning and teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lu, Z., & Sun, J. (2017). Presenting English polysemous phrasal verbs with two metaphor-based cognitive methods to Chinese EFL learners. System, 691, 153–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahpeykar, N., & Tyler, A. (2015). A principled cognitive linguistics account of English phrasal verbs with up and out. Language and Cognition, 7(1), 1–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moon, R. (1997). Vocabulary connections: Multi-word items in English. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 40–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neagu, M. (2007). English verb particles and their acquisition: A cognitive approach. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 201, 121–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravin, Y., & Leacock, C. (2000). Polysemy: An overview. In Y. Ravin & C. Leacock (Eds.), Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches (pp. 1–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 192–233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1977). Human categorization. Studies in Cross-Cultural Psychology, 11, 1–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 382–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (2003). Word power: Phrasal verbs and compounds: A cognitive approach. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 199–227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., & McCarthy, M. (Eds.). (1997). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, S. A. (2021). Exploring knowledge of transparent and non-transparent multi-word phrases among L2 English learners living in an anglophone setting. System, 1011, 102590. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strong, B., & Boers, F. (2019). The error in trial and error: Exercises on phrasal verbs. TESOL Quarterly, 53(2), 289–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swan, M. (1997). The influence of the mother tongue on second language vocabulary acquisition and use. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 156–280). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics (vol. II): Typology and process in concept. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (2017). Syntactic constructions as prototype categories. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (vol. 1) (pp. 177–202). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torres-Martínez, S. (2015). A constructionist approach to the teaching of phrasal verbs: Dispelling the verb+particle myth in multiword verb instruction. English Today, 31(3), 46–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2004). Applying cognitive linguistics to pedagogical grammar: The case of over. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (Vol. 181) (pp. 257–280). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Veer, R. (2000). Some reflections concerning Gal’perin’s theory. Human Development, 431, 99–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verspoor, M., & Lowie, W. (2003). Making sense of polysemous words. Language Learning, 53(3), 547–586. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, B. J. (2012). A conceptual approach to the instruction of phrasal verbs. The Modern Language Journal, 96(3), 419–438. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yasuda, S. (2010). Learning phrasal verbs through conceptual metaphors: A case of Japanese EFL Learners. TESOL Quarterly, 44(2), 250–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zibin, A. (2016). The comprehension of metaphorical expressions by Jordanian EFL learners. Sage Open, 6(2), 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Xu, Ruimeng
2025. Metaphor Research from the Perspective of Cognitive Linguistics: A Case Study of “Sea” in The Old Man and the Sea. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences 5:10 ► pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Lin, Sarah Hui-Ching & Alex Ho-Cheong Leung
2024. ESL classroom interactions in a translanguaging space. Applied Linguistics Review 15:6 ► pp. 2397 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue