Cover not available

Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 10:1 (2023) ► pp.132

References (30)
References
Bacz, B. (2002). On the image-schema proposals for the preposition po in Polish. Glossos, 31, 1–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F. (1996). Spatial prepositions and metaphor: A cognitive semantic journey along the up-down and front-back dimensions. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bogatova, G. A. (1995). Slovar’ russkogo jazyka 11–17 vekov [Dictionary of the Russian language of the 11th-17th centuries]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brugman, C. (1981). The story of over. M.A. Thesis, University of California.
Col, G., & Poibeau, T. (2014). An instruction-based analysis of over. Language and Cognition, 6(3), 370–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dewell, R. B. (1994). Over again: Image-schema transformations in semantic analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 5(4), 351–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dirven, R. (1995). The construal of cause: The case of cause prepositions. In J. R. Taylor & R. E. MacLaur (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world (pp. 95–118). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janda, L. A. (2000). A cognitive model of the Russian accusative case. Trudy meždunarodnoj konferencii Kognitivnoe modelirovanie, 41, 20–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kalyuga, M. (2020). Russian prepositional phrases: A cognitive linguistic approach. Singapore: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreitzer, A. (1997). Multiple levels of schematization: A study in the conceptualization of space. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 291–326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., Espenson, J., & Schwartz, A. (1991). The master metaphor list. URL: [URL]. Accessed 3 March 2022.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar (vol. 1): Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matovac, D. (2014). The semantics of the preposition po in Croatian language. Croatica et Slavica Iadertina, 10(10), 3–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meex, B. (1997). The spatial and non-spatial senses of the German preposition Über. In H. Cuyckens & B. E. Zawada (Eds.), Polysemy in cognitive linguistics: Selected papers from the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, 19971 (pp. 1–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mori, S. (2019). A cognitive analysis of the preposition OVER: Image-schema transformations and metaphorical extensions. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, 64(3), 444–474. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palancar, E. L. (2001). Emergent markers: The relation of instruments, causes, and agents in grammatical constructions. STUF – Language Typology and Universals, 54(4), 365–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). The origin of agent markers. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sreznevsky, I. I. (2003). Materialy dlja slovarja drevnerusskogo jazyka po pis’mennym pamjatnikam [Materials for a dictionary of the Old Russian language based on the written sources]. Moscow: Znak.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tchizmarova, I. (2012). A cognitive analysis of the Bulgarian prepositions and verbal prefixes NAD and POD. Jazykoslovje, 13(1), 219–260.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2001). Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The case of over. Language, 77(4), 724–765. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003a). Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The case of over. In B. Nerlich, Z. Todd, V. Herman & D. D. Clarke (Eds.), Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language (pp. 95–159). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003b). The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Gucht, F., Willems, K., & De Cuypere, L. (2007). The iconicity of embodied meaning: Polysemy of spatial prepositions in the cognitive framework. Language Sciences, 29(6), 733–754. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, K. (2004). A typological, historical, and functional study of adpositions in the languages of the world. URL: [URL]. Accessed 6 February 2022.
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue