Cover not available

Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 10:1 (2023) ► pp.117–145

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Metaphors and pseudometaphors of language as controversial messages in public discourse about Serbian

ORCiD logo with link | University of Oslo
Published online: 5 October 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.22003.cic
Abstract
Set in the contemporary public discourse about the Serbian language, this paper demonstrates how metaphors of and about language constructed with the source domains of violence and war (e.g., language occupation, language as battlefield, to fight for language) may serve nationalistic political aims and act as conflict-inciting messages, under the pretenses of typical language purism or ‘language care’. The concept of pseudometaphor is introduced as a figuration-based discursive strategy whereby metaphors for language, underpinned by the language-language users metonymy, may serve as tools for covertly conveying controversial messages about their respective language users. The analysis covers public discourse published in a span of eight years (2010–2018), involving institutionalized language and political campaigns, and less institutionalized public language debates. As convergent evidence for pseudo-metaphoricity of the language-war/violence metaphors and their potential for instigating inter-ethnic conflict, the analysis includes critical voices that expose the dominant ideology through literalization of their metaphorical models.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
    • 2.1Language – language users – nation: Romantic and rationalist models of language revisited
    • 2.2Metaphor and metaphorical representations of language
  • 3.Serbian, post-Yugoslav sociolinguistic context
  • 4.Corpus and method for metaphor identification
  • 5.Analysis
    • 5.1violence as death
      • 5.1.1violence as division and dispossession
    • 5.2striking, battling, and reading as a type of language care
    • 5.3Exposing pseudometaphoricity of the dominant ideology through literalization
  • 6.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (47)
References
Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (revised edition). London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arbib, M. A., & Hesse, M. B. (1986). The construction of reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bermel, N. (2007). Linguistic authority, language ideology, and metaphor: The Czech orthography wars. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berthele, R. (2008). A nation is a territory with one culture and one language: The role of metaphorical folk models in language policy debates. In G. Kristiansen & R. Dirven (Eds.), Cognitive sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems (pp. 301–331). Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bogetić, K. D. (2018). Metaphors of English and Serbian language in British and Serbian newspaper discourse. Ph.D. dissertation. Belgrade: University of Belgrade. Retrieved from [URL]
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse & Society, 18(2), 197–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan London. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Čičin-Šain, V. (2019). Metaphors for language contact and change: Croatian language and national identity. In L. Šarić & M. Stanojević (Eds.), Metaphor, nation, discourse (pp. 127–154). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Čolović, I. (2008). Balkan – teror kulture: Ogledi o političkoj antropologiji, 21 [The balkans – The terror of culture: Essays on political anthropology, 2]. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Đurović, T., & Silaški, N. (2019). Barbed wire around Serbia: Migrant metaphors as a means of constructing national identity. In L. Šarić & M. Stanojević (Eds.), Metaphor, nation and discours (pp. 59–74). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2003). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Felberg, T. R., & Šarić, L. (2013). Discursive construction of language identity through disputes in croatian and montenegrin media. Scando-Slavica, 59(1),7–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. (2003). Cultural models of linguistic standardization. In R. Dirven, R. Frank & M. Pütz (Eds.), Cognitive models in language and thought: Ideology, metaphors and meanings (pp. 25–68). Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, R. D. (2008). Language and identity in the balkans: Serbo-Croatian and its disintegration. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ilić, M. (2014). Collective narrative: The narrative on Croatian language from academic to far-right discourses in Serbia. Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology 5(1), 49–73.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
IN4S. (2013). Odricanje od srpskog jezika i ćirilice za Srbe znači odricanje od samih sebe [Giving up on the Serbian language and Cyrillic Script for Serbs means giving up on themselves]. IN4S. Retrieved from [URL]
Joseph, J. E. (2004). Language and identity: National, ethnic, religious. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire/New York, N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jovanović, J. R. (2015). Da dakanje ne pređe u naviku [Against making constructions with ‘da’ habitual]. Politika. Retrieved from [URL]
KhosraviNik, M. (2009). The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers during the Balkan conflict (1999) and the British general election (2005). Discourse & Society, 20(4), 477–498. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kordić, S. (2010). Jezik i nacionalizam [Language and nationalism]. Zagreb: Durieux.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kӧvecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langston, K., & Peti-Stantić, A. (2014). Language planning and national identity in Croatia. London: Palgrave Macmillan London. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marković, T. (2016). GOVORITE LI APSURDISTANSKI: Odbrana i poslednji dani ćirilice [DO YOU SPEAK ABSURDISTAN: Defense and the Last Days of Cyrillic]. Žurnal. Retrieved from [URL]
Mičić Kandijaš, S. (2015). Agensi nisu agenti [Chemical agents are not secret agents]. Politika. Retrieved from [URL]
Milinković, D. (2017). Tri stuba za opstanak svih Srba [Three pillars for the survival of all Serbs]. Novosti. Retrieved from [URL]
Musolff, A. (2016). Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polzenhagen, F., & Dirven, R. (2008). Rationalist or romantic model in globalisation?. In G. Kristiansen & R. Dirven (Eds.), Cognitive sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems (pp. 237–300). Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radisavljević, Z. (2012). Neizdrživo nasilje nad jezičkom kulturom [Unbearable violence against Language culture]. Politika. Retrieved from [URL]
(2015a). Srpski jezik se umnožava deljenjem [The Serbian language is multiplied by division]. Politika. Retrieved from [URL]
Radovanović, Z. (2015b). Tuđice nisu otmene reči [Foreign words are not posh]. Politika. Retrieved from [URL]
Reddy, M. J. (1993). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 164–201). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1978). The metaphorical process as cognition, imagination, and feeling. Critical Inquiry, 5(1), 143–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seargeant, P. (2009). Metaphors of possession in the conceptualisation of language. Language & Communication, 29(4), 383–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sretenović, M. (2018). Jurišanje na srpski jezik [Assault on the Serbian language], Politika. Retrieved from [URL]
Šarić, L. (2014). Metafora, diskurs i društvo [Metaphor, discourse, and society]. In M. Stanojević (Ed.), Metafore koje istražujemo: Suvremeni uvidi u konceptualnu metaforu [Investigating metaphors: Current insights into conceptual metaphor] (pp. 169–202). Zagreb: Srednja Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanjug. (2016). Konferencija “Jezici i nacionalizam” održana u Beogradu [The “Languages and Nationalism” conference held in Belgrade]. b92. Retrieved from [URL]
. (2018). Predlog za razmišljanje o jeziku i nama [A suggestion for reflection about the language and us]. Politika. Retrieved from [URL]
Underhill, J. W. (2013). Creating worldviews: Metaphor, ideology, and language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Horst, J. (2008). Het einde van de standardtaal. Een wisseling van Europese taalcultuur [The end of the standard language: A change of European language culture]. Amsterdam: J.M. Meulenhoff, 2008. Translated to Croatian by Radovan Lučić (2016) as Propast standardnoga jezika [The collapse of the standard language]. Zagreb: Srednja Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vervaet, S. (2019). “Let’s work on our Serbian!”: Standard language ideology, metaphors and discourses about Serbian national identity in the newspaper Politika in 2015. In L. Šarić & M. Stanojević (Eds.), Metaphor, Nation, Discourse (pp. 101–126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vijesti.ba. (2018). Nestala pompezno najavljivana Deklaracija o opstanku srpskog naroda [The pompously announced declaration on the survival of the Serbian nation disappeared], Vijesti.ba. Retrieved from [URL]
Vukosavljević, V. (2017). Definisati kulturno jezgro i prostor [To define the cultural core and space]. Politika. Retrieved from [URL]
Watts, R. J. (2011). Language myths and the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Živančević, N. (2018). Negujmo srpski, poštujmo francuski [Let’s respect French, but take care of Serbian]. Politika. Retrieved from [URL]
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue